RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,182
Posts: 5,435,730
Members: 24,947
Currently online: 569
Newest member: CaptainJaymez

TrekToday headlines

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old May 25 2013, 10:06 PM   #271
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:06 PM   #272
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Harvey wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
J. Allen wrote: View Post
So you credit Abrams with keeping the Star Trek franchise alive.
It wasn't dead to begin with.
Is I Love Lucy still a viable franchise, too? After all, it also manages to sell quite a bit of merchandise and is still being syndicated.
Then I'd say it's still viable even if not on the level of Star Trek.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:14 PM   #273
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Yeah, I suspect we could go back and forth forever on what constitutes "life" and "death" when it comes to some particular piece of pop culture. Is Mandrake the Magician still a going concern? Does Doc Savage need saving? Is something still mainstream or just a nostalgic footnote? And how much does that matter to the true believers?

Clearly, we need Dr. McCoy to wave his medical scanner and declare whether "It's dead, JIm" or not!
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:17 PM   #274
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Was the Star Wars franchise truly dead and obscure in the intervening years between the two trilogies? New product continued to tap into a continued interest in the property.
The Star Wars movie franchise was dead. As for the Beatles, music is a bit different but I see your point.

But then that means pretty much nothing is dead. Latin isn't a dead language because some people still learn it, etc. It makes the term "dead" for non-living things useless.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:18 PM   #275
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Harvey wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
It wasn't dead to begin with.
Is I Love Lucy still a viable franchise, too? After all, it also manages to sell quite a bit of merchandise and is still being syndicated.
Then I'd say it's still viable even if not on the level of Star Trek.
I actually saw an "I Love Lucy" magazine on sale at the grocery store today. And I know that "Lucy" xmas ornaments are still coming out.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:23 PM   #276
Rainbow Dash
Rainbow Horse Man
 
Rainbow Dash's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's House
Send a message via ICQ to Rainbow Dash Send a message via AIM to Rainbow Dash Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Rainbow Dash Send a message via Yahoo to Rainbow Dash
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Harvey wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
It wasn't dead to begin with.
Is I Love Lucy still a viable franchise, too? After all, it also manages to sell quite a bit of merchandise and is still being syndicated.
Then I'd say it's still viable even if not on the level of Star Trek.
J.J.'s Star Trek (2009) received critical praise, and took in more money than any previous Star Trek movie. Hell, in terms of financial success, and adjusted for inflation, it's domestic box office take alone was 4 times that of Star Trek: Nemesis' entire worldwide box office take.

What I've gathered so far from you is that:

1) Respect doesn't matter.
2) Financial success doesn't matter.
3) Critical acclaim doesn't matter.

Without those standards, applied, you could say that "no, J.J. didn't save the franchise." Of course, that being the case, without those same standards, the entire Star Trek franchise, including the various series', can be easily replicated and is nothing special. So why would you complain about what happens to it in the first place?
__________________
I think heaven is what you make it. When I close my eyes for the final time, I hope to wake up standing in a grassy, breezy, sunlit field, a green tennis ball at my feet, and a little black lab, with a white diamond on her chest, running right towards me.
Rainbow Dash is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:29 PM   #277
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

BillJ wrote: View Post
The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
I don't know. I'm pretty sure Chekov was the fifth Beatle.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:32 PM   #278
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
I don't know. I'm pretty sure Chekov was the fifth Beatle.
You sure he wasn't the first? The Beatles ver a Wussian inwention after all...
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:32 PM   #279
CorporalClegg
Admiral
 
CorporalClegg's Avatar
 
Location: Land of Enchantment
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
I don't know. I'm pretty sure Chekov was the fifth Beatle.
"Back in the U.S.S.R." finally makes sense!

Mind blown.
__________________
Konnichi wa!
CorporalClegg is online now  
Old May 25 2013, 10:37 PM   #280
Count Zero
Decidedly something
 
Count Zero's Avatar
 
Location: Land of Awesome
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Harvey wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
Count Zero wrote: View Post

Huh? The Beatles predate Star Trek by a couple of years.
Yep, a couple of years. But how broadly recognized are they among those below a certain age group, say '40s and up?
Very broadly. There are few musical icons more widely recognized in the United States (and, I would guess, abroad).
Yeah, they're certainly better known than Star Trek.
__________________
"Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates." Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi
Count Zero is online now  
Old May 25 2013, 10:42 PM   #281
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
Belz... wrote: View Post
As I said, I don't think this is what people mean by "saving the franchise", Warped9.
Oh, I understand what they mean. I just disagree with their meaning.

There hasn't been new Beatles music since 1970, but someone is maintaining and overseeing the copyright over their music. And money (I've no idea how much) continues to be made from that music. Yet while The Beatles likely are no longer as recognized among younger generations I think its safe to say they are hardly obscure as in totally forgotten but for a handful of devotees.

Over the decades I think its safe to say Star Trek has enjoyed a longer period of broad awareness than The Beatles' music.

Was the Star Wars franchise truly dead and obscure in the intervening years between the two trilogies? New product continued to tap into a continued interest in the property.

What I'm talking about is a matter of definition. Neither in the '70s or the more recently was Star Trek ever so obscure as to be forgotten and off-the-radar of broader awareness.
So when Russell T. Davies brought Doctor Who back to the TV screen, he didn't save/resurrect that show anymore than J. J. Abrams did with Star Trek?
beamMe is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:44 PM   #282
iguana_tonante
Admiral
 
iguana_tonante's Avatar
 
Location: Italy, EU
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Count Zero wrote: View Post
Harvey wrote: View Post
Warped9 wrote: View Post
Yep, a couple of years. But how broadly recognized are they among those below a certain age group, say '40s and up?
Very broadly. There are few musical icons more widely recognized in the United States (and, I would guess, abroad).
Yeah, they're certainly better known than Star Trek.
Generally speaking: Beatles > Jesus > Star Trek.
__________________
Scientist. Gentleman. Teacher. Fighter. Lover. Father.
iguana_tonante is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:44 PM   #283
stj
Rear Admiral
 
stj's Avatar
 
Location: the real world
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Greg Cox wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
I don't know. I'm pretty sure Chekov was the fifth Beatle.
This is so typical of Trekkie grandiosity. Everyone knows Chekhov was merely Davy Jones of the Monkees!



If you like the movies, Star Trek was saved. If you don't, it wasn't. The box office is irrelevant and doesn't prove a damn thing. And it's still absurdly early to imagine that his version is going to be remembered and exploited. Will people really be so blown away when Into Darkness is remade in an alternate universe version where it is Uhura who dies, and Scotty who yells Khaaaaaan, and an even bigger Enterprise bursts forth from the clouds?
__________________
The people of this country need regime change here, not abroad.
stj is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:46 PM   #284
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

stj wrote: View Post
Greg Cox wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
The Beatles and Star Trek are not in the same cultural ballpark. They aren't even in the same national park.
I don't know. I'm pretty sure Chekov was the fifth Beatle.
This is so typical of Trekkie grandiosity. Everyone knows Chekhov was merely Davy Jones of the Monkees!
Oh, you daydream believer, you . . ..
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline  
Old May 25 2013, 10:47 PM   #285
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

iguana_tonante wrote: View Post

Generally speaking: Beatles > Star Wars > Jesus > Star Trek.
Fixed that for you.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.