RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,348
Posts: 5,502,573
Members: 25,120
Currently online: 566
Newest member: Gaytrekgeek

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Welcome to the Trek BBS! > General Trek Discussion

General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old May 24 2013, 04:20 PM   #181
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

RXTT wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
RXTT wrote: View Post
"Anybody who knows me knows I would never read a comic book. And I certainly would never read anything written by Kevin Smith." - Tim Burton talking about a claim made (probably in half-jest) by Kevin Smith that Burton's Planet of the Apes ending/story was taken from K Smith's previous Planet of the Apes comic books.
So, not hates then. I'm not a fan of Smith's comic book output either.

that's not the point. the point is that Burton said he would NEVER READ A COMIC BOOK. That sounds like active dislike, or at the least serious disdain.
So? Not everyone is going to share the same opinions, likes and dislikes that you are. I'm not a fan of comic books myself. That doesn't mean I'm completely clueless to the Batman universe. Movies, tv shows, cartoons, novels, comics, they're all different and varying ways to tell a story. They all appeal to different audiences.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 04:22 PM   #182
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

RXTT wrote: View Post
The basics of batman have not changed, because they are the core of who the character is.

he was born wealthy. His parents were killed by a lowly criminal. He is super smart. He trained himself in all the ways he could to fight crime. he wears a bat outfit to scare criminals.

Trek is the same in a sense.

The Earth solved it's petty divisions, Humans created faster-than-light travel, They met other species who also traveled the stars. They created a Federation of Planets. They explore the galaxy.

That is SIMPLE and genius. It allows for the creation of countless stories, and little worlds-within-the-big-world of Trek.

In keeping faith to this JJ did a good job. Now, whether the new crop of actors will resonate with fans the way the OG cast did, or the TNG cast did, or the DS9 cast did (NINER 4 LIFE!), that is another question. I hope they do, but getting the same actors to constantly play the same roles was difficult for the OG cast, and near impossible for the current crop of Hollywood actors.

In conventions of the future, will Shatner be Kirk I and the new guy (sorry but I do not remember the dude's name) be Kirk II?

Will Quinto be Spock Beta and Nimoy be Spock Alpha?

I wonder....
So what was the point of your response to JirinPanthosa then? Following the canon is different than following the "guidelines". The guidelines are broad strokes. Canon is the minutia.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 04:25 PM   #183
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

RXTT wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
RXTT wrote: View Post
"Anybody who knows me knows I would never read a comic book. And I certainly would never read anything written by Kevin Smith." - Tim Burton talking about a claim made (probably in half-jest) by Kevin Smith that Burton's Planet of the Apes ending/story was taken from K Smith's previous Planet of the Apes comic books.
So, not hates then. I'm not a fan of Smith's comic book output either.

that's not the point. the point is that Burton said he would NEVER READ A COMIC BOOK. That sounds like active dislike, or at the least serious disdain.
Not really. I know a lot of people who've never read a comic. Doesn't mean they hate them, just that the format doesn't appeal to them.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 04:34 PM   #184
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

RXTT wrote: View Post
The basics of batman have not changed, because they are the core of who the character is.

he was born wealthy. His parents were killed by a lowly criminal. He is super smart. He trained himself in all the ways he could to fight crime. he wears a bat outfit to scare criminals.
And yet any of these things could be changed if it fit the story. Nolan's Wayne/Batman is certainly very different from the comic book one.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 05:10 PM   #185
RXTT
Lieutenant
 
RXTT's Avatar
 
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

All I know is that Batman is a Niner.
RXTT is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 06:12 PM   #186
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Abrams created a new franchise, and that one is kept alive by STD, some tie-in comics and some tie-in games. It doesn't do jack shit for the old franchise. The old franchise is kept alive by things like blu ray releases for TNG. Otherwise it would slowly die off. Heck, that the actor of Bane happened to play Shinzon probably helped to sell a few Nemesis DVDs.
JarodRussell is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 06:30 PM   #187
horatio83
Commodore
 
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Warped9 wrote: View Post
I don't grant Abrams any credit for following the pack and doing what most others are doing with summer popcorn fare: pander to cliches and broad caricature and distraction of hyper-action and flashy f/x. That's practically an established play book for summer fare. And he's hailed as genius for doing what everyone else is doing. Please.

The block buster mentality is self-defeating in the long run I think. Evermore is spent in the expectation for ever bigger returns and it inevitably gets to the point where even respectable returns are viewed as disappointing. Shmucks.
This. These movies are fine action movies. I'd even go so far and claim that ST09 was the best rollercoaster theatre experience I ever had. But if you expect anything else from them, like at least half-thought through scripts with some interesting ideas, they fail.
Nobody is claiming that Trek was ever on average particularly intelligent. If you want intelligent sci-fi you read and don't watch TV. Which is precisely why dumbing it down is inexcusable.
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger
horatio83 is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 06:34 PM   #188
Nightdiamond
Fleet Captain
 
Nightdiamond's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

J. Allen wrote: View Post

Where did the studio heads say the movie was a disappointment? If they did, by chance, say this, are they aware the movie is still new in theaters?
There are business sites that saying that the box office is 'disappointing' mainly because execs were expecting a much larger opening;

Paramount Pictures’ “Star Trek Into Darkness,” the second installment in the rebooted franchise, opened to disappointing ticket sales, squeezed by holdovers “Iron Man 3” and “The Great Gatsby.

“More was expected,” said Phil Contrino, chief analyst with BoxOffice.com in Beverly Hills, California.

And some sites that claim this;

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...ox-office.html

http://www.contactmusic.com/news/sta...office_3676064

I'll assume these box office analysts are basing this claim from studio execs expectations.

This is the typical pattern you see with blockbuster flicks and big budget reboots-- spend more, not making enough-it's a bomb, lets reboot again.
Nightdiamond is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 06:54 PM   #189
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Lord Garth wrote: View Post
Paramount would've eventually wanted to reboot Star Trek, Abrams or not.
Maybe.

There's no reason to assume that it would have been successful.

We only know that Abrams has made it more successful than ever before.

Therefore, he's due all the credit that people give him.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 06:59 PM   #190
Santa Kang
Fleet Admiral
 
Santa Kang's Avatar
 
Location: North Pole,Qo'noS
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Abrams created a new franchise, and that one is kept alive by STD, some tie-in comics and some tie-in games. It doesn't do jack shit for the old franchise. The old franchise is kept alive by things like blu ray releases for TNG. Otherwise it would slowly die off. Heck, that the actor of Bane happened to play Shinzon probably helped to sell a few Nemesis DVDs.
It's the same franchise: Star Trek.
__________________
Nerys Myk
Santa Kang is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 07:16 PM   #191
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Lord Garth wrote: View Post
Paramount would've eventually wanted to reboot Star Trek, Abrams or not.
Maybe.

There's no reason to assume that it would have been successful.
Exactly. Not every attempt at a reboot succeeds. Hello, LOST IN SPACE (twice), DARK SHADOWS (thrice!), FLASH GORDON (Syfy version), THE FUGITIVE (Tim Daly version), THE NIGHT STALKER, THE AVENGERS (Uma Thurman version), THE SHADOW, THE PHANTOM (twice), THE GREEN HORNET, WONDER WOMAN, etc.

Rebooting a franchise is harder than it looks. For every BATTLESTAR GALACTICA or BATMAN BEGINS, there's a failed attempt to revive KOJAK or THE BIONIC WOMAN. And the jury is still out on THE LONE RANGER and IRONSIDE.

We can't just assume that a different reboot of STAR TREK would have been an automatic success.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com

Last edited by Greg Cox; May 24 2013 at 07:35 PM.
Greg Cox is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 07:44 PM   #192
Santa Claus
Believe
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Abrams created a new franchise, and that one is kept alive by STD, some tie-in comics and some tie-in games. It doesn't do jack shit for the old franchise. The old franchise is kept alive by things like blu ray releases for TNG. Otherwise it would slowly die off. Heck, that the actor of Bane happened to play Shinzon probably helped to sell a few Nemesis DVDs.
The new movies have infused life back into the older series' and movies. Do you honestly think that they aren't connected, even as the new movies make a direct connection to the original series?

Nightdiamond wrote: View Post
J. Allen wrote: View Post

Where did the studio heads say the movie was a disappointment? If they did, by chance, say this, are they aware the movie is still new in theaters?
There are business sites that saying that the box office is 'disappointing' mainly because execs were expecting a much larger opening;

Paramount Pictures’ “Star Trek Into Darkness,” the second installment in the rebooted franchise, opened to disappointing ticket sales, squeezed by holdovers “Iron Man 3” and “The Great Gatsby.

“More was expected,” said Phil Contrino, chief analyst with BoxOffice.com in Beverly Hills, California.

And some sites that claim this;

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...ox-office.html

http://www.contactmusic.com/news/sta...office_3676064

I'll assume these box office analysts are basing this claim from studio execs expectations.

This is the typical pattern you see with blockbuster flicks and big budget reboots-- spend more, not making enough-it's a bomb, lets reboot again.
"Studio heads are disappointed," and "some people claim studio heads are/should be disappointed" are two wildly different statements. The adjustment made by the studio executives was made at the last minute, and the release date was changed somewhat, which undoubtedly confused some people, as now they were hearing three dates (15th, 16th, and 17th) in the U.S.

That will have an effect on box office take. The original expectations by the studio, before the last minute push, was right in line with how Star Trek Into Darkness is doing now.

I have heard nothing about the Paramount studio execs being disappointed.
__________________
---------
"I believe... I believe... It's silly, but I believe." - Susan Walker
---------
❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is online now  
Old May 24 2013, 09:00 PM   #193
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Well _I_ was a bit dissapointed. I wanted 100+ million by the first Sunday, not 84.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 09:02 PM   #194
RXTT
Lieutenant
 
RXTT's Avatar
 
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

I wanted 300 million federation credits
RXTT is offline  
Old May 24 2013, 10:34 PM   #195
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: Did Abrams really save the franchise?

Federation credits aren't good out here. I need something more real.

Woah, wrong franchise.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.