RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 149,553
Posts: 5,945,751
Members: 26,481
Currently online: 363
Newest member: killer6618

TrekToday headlines

STO Community Supports Chase Masterson Charity
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Greenwood To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Shatner In Hallmark Christmas Movie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Abrams On Star Trek Into Darkness Flaws
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek Beyond In IMAX
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Red Shirt Diaries: The Return of The Archons
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Abrams Loves His Lens Flares
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Elba Star Trek Beyond Character Speculation
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Retro Review: Meld
By: Michelle Erica Green on Nov 20

Borg Cube Paper Lantern
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy All your nerd stuff goes here.

Thread Tools
Old May 31 2013, 06:39 AM   #1
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

So I'm watching Deathly Hallows 1 today. I know the book and movie differ, but I don't think they differ regarding this.

Snape hides the sword of Gryffindor's in the lake and sends his doe patronus to Haary to follow to the sword.

While Snape could just have his patronus "find Harry and lead him to the sword," wherever he happened to be (a point I'm not sure of either), the sword was relatively near to where Harry was.

In the movie (at least) the doe also led Ron back to Harry. Again, I suppose we are to assume Snape could tell his patronus to "find Ron and lead him to the sword"--that Snape did not take the chance that Harry and Ron were together. While Ron thought he was being led to Harry, he was actually being led to the sword, and Harry happened to also be there. Ron does say he followed the doe for a while--unsure how long--but he was led at least a distance while Harry was damn close to sword.

Did Snape know where Harry was when he hid the sword that he was able to hide it so close? Otherwise, Harry could been running over hill and dale to find the thing, kinda like Ron did.
propita is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 31 2013, 08:59 AM   #2
Vice Admiral
Sephiroth's Avatar
Location: Sephiroth
Re: Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

short answer: A Wizard did it

Long answer: Dumbledoor's out-putter lead Ron to Harry and Hermione had a painting in her purse of holding of a Hogwarts headmaster that overheard her and reported to Snape. Thank you google.
No, you clearly don't know who you're talking to, so let me clue you in. I am not in danger, Skyler. I am the danger. A guy opens his door and gets shot and you think that of me? No. I am the one who knocks!
Sephiroth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 01:38 AM   #3
Rear Admiral
gblews's Avatar
Location: So. Cal.
View gblews's Twitter Profile
Re: Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

Ah, I always have HP questions. FYI ~ I haven't read any of the books but have seen all of the movies numerous times and loved them all.

Can someone, anyone explain all of the stuff that happens in the scene in Half Blood Prince where Harry is shown Dumbledore's first meeting with Tom Riddle? The only thing I think I understood was the 7 seven stones (symbols for the horcrux'?) and the photo of the little island where Harry and Dumbledore find what they mistakenly think is one of the hocux'.

But after Dumbledore starts the magic fire in the wardrobe, how does he know that there are stolen items inside? What is the one word expletive Tom shouts after the teacher introduces Dumbledore to Tom? It sounds like "GO", or some such.

In Order of the Phoenix, what was the significance of the prophesy to Valdemort? He seems to at all times be aware that Harry is a danger and he (Valdemort) must personally kill him (and about the similarity of their wands), so what difference would his having the prophesy have made?

Thanks for any light that can be shed.
Duckman: I'll never forget the last thing my father said to me...
Cornfed: "Careful son, I don't think the safety's on"?
Duckman: BEFORE THAT!!!
gblews is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 06:38 AM   #4
Vice Admiral
Anwar's Avatar
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Re: Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

The prophecy was of little to no value, it was just that the good guys made him think there was more value to it so to get him to send someone to take it. It was a lure and trap to get some Death Eaters and maybe Voldemort himself, and it worked.
Anwar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 12:19 PM   #5
Timelord Victorious
Rear Admiral
Timelord Victorious's Avatar
Location: Germany, Earth, the Solar System
Re: Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

Not exactly, the First Part of the prophecy was self fulfilling.

It said that a specific boy was going to kill the dark lord.
But the description fit 2 boys, Harry and Neville.
He decided that Harry must be the one, so went and tried to kill him First which backfired and created the new hidden horcrux.
So Voldemort set the fulfillment of the prophecy in motion himself.
Because of this Harry was later able to kill him by sacrificing his life and Voldemort destroyed the last Horcrux himself.
One cannot live while the other survives.

Had Voldemort ignored the prophecy nothing would have happened at all, no chosen one to challenge him.
Timelord Victorious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 1 2013, 08:37 PM   #6
Vice Admiral
Anwar's Avatar
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Re: Harry Potter question. (Spoilers likely but so what at this point)

Yes, that's another thing. If Voldemort had done nothing, the Prophecy never would've come true.

Makes me wonder if this is true for all prophecies in the HP world, and if that's true it's wonder no one made the connection yet.
Anwar is online now   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.