RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,584
Posts: 5,515,245
Members: 25,156
Currently online: 526
Newest member: jerrlaro

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 18 2013, 07:57 AM   #61
sttngfan1701d
Commodore
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

So it's okay for Star Trek TMP to change the look of the Klingons to what they would eventually become, and very different from what they were in TOS, but not okay for STID to make some design tweaks to what we saw in the 90's?

The super-nitpicky portion of Trek fandom is a curious creature indeed.
sttngfan1701d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 08:54 AM   #62
DavidLeeRoth
Lieutenant
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

You know, I sort of like the look of the Klingons in the new film, but I also think canon should be respected and there should be consistency. If the Klingons are prominent in the next film, a two minute explanation about their appearance would be swell.
DavidLeeRoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 08:59 AM   #63
SantaEddie74
Fleet Admiral
 
SantaEddie74's Avatar
 
Location: The North Pole of the Warped Sector of the Demented Quadrant
View SantaEddie74's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

J.J. and his writers are no fools groping in the dark with little or no clue. They've made Enterprise references in both of their films thus far and I'm sure they all know about the ENT explanation for why Klingons had smooth, more humanlike appearances in the era of the original series. I'm sure if he and they had wanted to mention something about the Klingons' appearance in STID they would have, but the Klingon scenes were all related to intense combat and the capture of Harrison/Khan, so it's not as if there was any plausible reason nor even the time to have Uhura or Spock or Kirk mention something about some Klingons not having cranial ridges when the focus of that whole sequence was the running battle on Qo'noS and Khan kicking some major ass.

If it happens at all, there'll be a more appropriate time and place for the forehead issue to be spoken about.
__________________
Remember what cooleddie74 says, kids:

"Don't forget to have a Patrick Swayze Christmas!"
SantaEddie74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 09:05 AM   #64
Santa Claus
Digitally Assisted
 
Santa Claus's Avatar
 
Location: J. Allen's Rooftop
Send a message via ICQ to Santa Claus Send a message via AIM to Santa Claus Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Santa Claus Send a message via Yahoo to Santa Claus
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
You know, I sort of like the look of the Klingons in the new film, but I also think canon should be respected and there should be consistency. If the Klingons are prominent in the next film, a two minute explanation about their appearance would be swell.
What canon? The only canon that exists in this timeline has already explained why the Klingons look more smooth ridged as they do, and why they seem to take some eerily human aesthetics.
__________________

❄ A Joyful Holiday Season to You All! ❄

Santa Claus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 11:33 AM   #65
malchya
Lieutenant Commander
 
malchya's Avatar
 
Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

I hope that my daughter never reads this as I would never, ever be able to live it down: Canon, Shmanon. My first response was "Holy @$%&!" and that is the response you want from a Klingon. In retrospect, I groused about "JJ Klingons" and how I am conservative etc, etc. But that first reaction is what matters.

The D-4 left me cold. Too "Matrix" for me. But I could accept them. I mean, after all, I don't really like Spanish cruiser designs from the 20's and 30's either, but I accept they are real ships....
malchya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 12:19 PM   #66
SalvorHardin
Rear Admiral
 
SalvorHardin's Avatar
 
Location: Star's End
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?



__________________

SalvorHardin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 12:24 PM   #67
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
You know, I sort of like the look of the Klingons in the new film, but I also think canon should be respected and there should be consistency. If the Klingons are prominent in the next film, a two minute explanation about their appearance would be swell.
Ugh.

We're Star Trek fans, we're suppose to be smart and imaginative. Isn't the explanation that all Klingons don't look alike good enough? It is for me.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 01:16 PM   #68
Dick Whitman
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Behind the mask of Donald Draper
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

My only complaint about the Klingons is we did not see enough of them.
Dick Whitman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 01:19 PM   #69
DavidLeeRoth
Lieutenant
 
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

BillJ wrote: View Post
DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
You know, I sort of like the look of the Klingons in the new film, but I also think canon should be respected and there should be consistency. If the Klingons are prominent in the next film, a two minute explanation about their appearance would be swell.
Ugh.

We're Star Trek fans, we're suppose to be smart and imaginative. Isn't the explanation that all Klingons don't look alike good enough?
No.

Heck, even an official explanation in a press release as to why the Klingons look as they do would be nice. It wouldn't have to be explained on screen. A documentary on the evolution of the appearance of Klingons would be sweet.
DavidLeeRoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 01:31 PM   #70
SantaSpock
Fleet Captain
 
SantaSpock's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View SantaSpock's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Its good to see Klingons be almost as badass as they were in TOS until STVI. After STVI and in ENT they seemed to me to be acting like a bunch of drunken jocks travelling around the galaxy. However Uhura was wrong because in TOS, Klingons didn't crap on about honour and I'm disappointed that they didn't just try to destroy Mudd's ship without warning.

Forget the augment virus guys. It was all a Nexus dream. The Klingons always had head ridges and they always looked as they look in the current movie.

The Romulans always had ridges or never had ridges. No explanation. None needed
SantaSpock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 02:01 PM   #71
Bengoshi2000
Ensign
 
Location: NC, USA
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Donald Draper wrote: View Post
My only complaint about the Klingons is we did not see enough of them.
+1!

I found these Klingons to be much more menacing than the "blood and honor pontificating race" they became in TNG and later series. Uhura tried to "connect" with them on that level, and, well... we know how that worked out.

I also liked the use of piercings/jewelry. I can imagine that those would be used to signify rank or enemy kills.
Bengoshi2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:44 PM   #72
Rķu rķu, chķu
Fleet Admiral
 
Rķu rķu, chķu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Rķu rķu, chķu's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

Bengoshi2000 wrote: View Post

I also liked the use of piercings/jewelry. I can imagine that those would be used to signify rank or enemy kills.
I don't think they'd do that. Klingons have never worn rank insignia of any kind, since they can be trusted to be exactly the rank they say they are - it would be grossly dishonorable to lie about your rank or how many enemies you killed.

A Klingon might wear things like this as pure decoration, but not to signify anything specific. Their word is good enough.
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Rķu rķu, chķu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:47 PM   #73
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
DavidLeeRoth wrote: View Post
You know, I sort of like the look of the Klingons in the new film, but I also think canon should be respected and there should be consistency. If the Klingons are prominent in the next film, a two minute explanation about their appearance would be swell.
Ugh.

We're Star Trek fans, we're suppose to be smart and imaginative. Isn't the explanation that all Klingons don't look alike good enough?
No.

Heck, even an official explanation in a press release as to why the Klingons look as they do would be nice. It wouldn't have to be explained on screen. A documentary on the evolution of the appearance of Klingons would be sweet.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 05:48 PM   #74
Rķu rķu, chķu
Fleet Admiral
 
Rķu rķu, chķu's Avatar
 
Location: Mr. Laser Beam is in the visitor's bullpen
View Rķu rķu, chķu's Twitter Profile
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

^ Actually the computers ARE different, because of the advanced tech gleaned from scans of the Narada.
__________________
"A hot dog at the ballpark is better than a steak at the Ritz." - Humphrey Bogart
Rķu rķu, chķu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18 2013, 06:36 PM   #75
GMDreia
Commander
 
GMDreia's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area
Re: Klingons in STID--why do they look like [SPOILERS]?

The Klingons look much better on the movie screen than they do in the screen caps. The ridges look very subtle and the piercings look like they are meant to make the subtler ridges look more fierce. The costumes are a nod to the TOS costumes. I can buy the ridges in STID as a midway point between the Klingons suffering from the augment virus, and TNG - we have seen other Klingons before who were nearly ridgeless (like General Chang) and still bought them as Klingons.

There is more to a successful portrayal of something, than just how it looks; that's only one part. Most importantly they FELT Klingon.
__________________
I am the user formerly known as Fascinoma
GMDreia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.