RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,170
Posts: 5,435,341
Members: 24,939
Currently online: 479
Newest member: katlynwomack

TrekToday headlines

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 3 2013, 01:45 AM   #1
xvicente
Commander
 
xvicente's Avatar
 
airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Now that I am viddying these fine examples of art down there at the fan art section, where they speculate (and back those speculations with awesome cgi) where everything is inside the Enterprise, and also the Shane Johnson book I avidly read back then,....

... the airlocks placement dont make a bit of sense. Why would anyone choose to board the ship in the middle of the cargo deck where there is nothing besides a corridor from the side of the hangar bay to somewhere else (ok, there is a turbolift, but so far from the more useful places). Or the side of the fraking torpedo room? what is in there except crampiness?

An there is tho one at the back of the bridge. The most busy place in the ship where visitors have, in principle, nothing to do.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------

I am here to talk about Star Trek and chew bubble gum.
and I'm all outta bubble gum.
xvicente is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 01:51 AM   #2
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Well on the model there's a docking hatch to the port side of the saucer rim. Looks like a large door that people could walk through. Dignitaries would probably enter through there if they didn't want to come in through the cramped and hostile-looking transporter room.

Most people coming onto the ship would be crewmembers, anyway.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 02:28 AM   #3
xvicente
Commander
 
xvicente's Avatar
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Belz... wrote: View Post
Well on the model there's a docking hatch to the port side of the saucer rim.
That one is fine as I see. The others would be just people crowding waiting fot the lift.

Now I remember there are more ports in the sauce, Spock and Kirk used one for their little visit to Vger's memory.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------

I am here to talk about Star Trek and chew bubble gum.
and I'm all outta bubble gum.
xvicente is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 02:55 AM   #4
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Yeah but they are more like hatches... not the kind of thing you use for regular egress.

I still say the other ports are for crewmembers so their being cramped is irrelevant.
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 02:57 AM   #5
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View Maurice's Twitter Profile
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

I think the real question here is what are you expecting to find behind an airlock?
__________________
* * *
"The road to hell is paved with works-in-progress."
—Philip Roth
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 03:22 AM   #6
SeerSGB
Admiral
 
SeerSGB's Avatar
 
Location: Out There...That Away
View SeerSGB's Twitter Profile
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

xvicente wrote: View Post
Now that I am viddying these fine examples of art down there at the fan art section, where they speculate (and back those speculations with awesome cgi) where everything is inside the Enterprise, and also the Shane Johnson book I avidly read back then,....

... the airlocks placement dont make a bit of sense. Why would anyone choose to board the ship in the middle of the cargo deck where there is nothing besides a corridor from the side of the hangar bay to somewhere else (ok, there is a turbolift, but so far from the more useful places). Or the side of the fraking torpedo room? what is in there except crampiness?

An there is tho one at the back of the bridge. The most busy place in the ship where visitors have, in principle, nothing to do.
Direct access to those sections? As for why Kirk used them? Who knows, it's Kirk he does stuff differently.

I've always assumed that if we ever saw the Enterprise properly docked for a resupply you've connecting tubes to those ports with small personal cargo (luggage) for the crew moving throw the secondary hull dock, weapons handlers loading empty p-torp cases through the launcher dock, and the saucer docks being used for people coming and going to the dock/station.
__________________
- SeerSGB -
"I've made many mistakes, and it's about time that I did something about that." The Doctor (Deep Breath)
| Blog | Homepage |
SeerSGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 04:25 PM   #7
SchwEnt
Fleet Captain
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

We may as well ask where *else* to put the airlocks?
If not at the torp bays and cargo bays, then where?

First thing that jumps to my mind is around the rim of the primary hull, although there are already the gangways located there.

So where should the airlocks be? Given what we know about TMP Enterprise, I don't know where else would be better or at least as good.
SchwEnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 04:53 PM   #8
cbspock
Rear Admiral
 
cbspock's Avatar
 
Location: San Antonio, TX
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

In TMP you see the gangway between the dock and the Saucer airlock. You see the shuttlepods delivering supplies through the hanger and into the cargo deck. I think the hatch locations make sense.

I thought a better portrayal of the Enterprise in dock was in Into Darkness we finally see the ship connected to dock umbilicals, etc. JJ Trek seems to use the shuttles a lot more to carry personnel and supplies than we saw in the first 6 movies.

-Chris
__________________
"It's important to give it all you have while you have the chance."-Shania
cbspock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 05:26 PM   #9
ConRefit79
Captain
 
ConRefit79's Avatar
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

cbspock wrote: View Post
JJ Trek seems to use the shuttles a lot more to carry personnel and supplies than we saw in the first 6 movies. -Chris
Because the studio gave him a bloated budget to create all that eye candy. After all, the Transporter was added as a cheap way of getting people to and from the ship on a TV budget.
ConRefit79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 06:26 PM   #10
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

An obvious rationale for the placement we see is accessibility from the outside. There's already access at the rear of the secondary hull, and there can be none at the front; the empty middles of the sides make the best sense for docking ports in this hull. There are probably various hatches at the bottom, even though their outlines aren't easily spotted in the early movies - the E-A features color-coding suggestive of such things. But docking ports won't work there, because having one flush with the bottom would require gravity adjustment facilities that consume space unduly.

Really, what you need for a docking port is a vertical wall unobstructed by things like warp engines or deflector dishes. None of that is available on the saucer, so the bridge aft extension makes good sense there, adding the verticality in the middle of the unobstructiveness. Some is available on the sides of the neck, and the torp deck is the thickest part of the neck so it can best accommodate things beyond the docking ports. Anywhere else you run into problems and have to do silly things like the saucer ventral docking ports / airlocks with their double hatches; you can only dock teeny weeny pods there.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 07:14 PM   #11
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Shuttles are good for outsided items too big/delicate for certain transporters.

I don't like the dock on the torpedo tube...

In addition to the main gangway, remember, there are two ports on the underside of the saucer that are covered by twin doors that are flush with the lower saucer exterior.

A spacesuited Kirk emerged from one of these in ST :TMP to rescue spock

I would have made those weapon ports to slide open for Kelvin/Phase cannon style extra armaments.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 07:46 PM   #12
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

In addition to the main gangway, remember, there are two ports on the underside of the saucer that are covered by twin doors that are flush with the lower saucer exterior.
You couldn't dock the Vulcan shuttle in those, though. And even the saucertop port places severe limitations on what can dock and what cannot. In contrast, you could basically dock another starship to the extremely accessible secondary hull ports...

Shuttles are good for outsided items too big/delicate for certain transporters.
Alas, we haven't seen a shuttle capable of handling cargo that would be too large for a "regular" transporter... Even the giant prop used in STXI only had teeny weeny personnel doors to the sides and the rear, and a floor hatch no larger than the average transporter platform (plus you'd need to hover to get any cargo in or out that way).

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 08:47 PM   #13
Richard Baker
Commander
 
Richard Baker's Avatar
 
Location: Warrior, AL
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

The Enterprise D connected to Starbases with the Dorsal/Neck Pylon Airlock, considering the different shapes of vessels it is a logical spot. On the Refit there are not very many vertical surfaces to use. The lower Saucer Airlocks might work for Travelpods, anything larger would have to use the A-Deck or sides...
I like having different ways to enter the ship- one nice feature introduced in TMP. Being forced to either beam over or use the Hangar Deck always seemed limited.
Richard Baker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 08:59 PM   #14
NCC-1701-B
Fleet Captain
 
NCC-1701-B's Avatar
 
Location: Liverpool
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

I don't think there's a problem with the airlock placements, they kind of account for the whole ship. People who are crewmembers in the engineering section enter through the one in the engineering section, those in the neck enter through the neck, and those in the saucer section enter through there. I reckon the main entrance for officials will be the bridge one, I'm sure there'll be a little welcome lounge, and it's only one floor below to the Officers lounge.
__________________
____________________________________________

Hellooo...
NCC-1701-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 3 2013, 09:53 PM   #15
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: airlock placemente in TMP Enterprise

Dunno - as a method of entry, it's awfully clumsy. The largest spacecraft we saw docking with those ports couldn't have carried more than a couple of dozen people at the very most, and probably had space for less than a dozen, so it's not a valid means of commuting to work. A single proper walkway (such as the one suggested as being on the saucer rim, even if we never quite saw it in action) would have way more capacity than all these docking ports put together, were the ship to dock with a pier. For commuting when not moored, the transporters ought to be more convenient.

For receiving the occasional visitor in the depths of space, these ports are fine and well, but only for craft that don't fit inside the shuttle landing bay. And it's difficult to imagine a deep space encounter situation calling for more than one docking port... Or for access into each and every section of the ship.

On the other hand, if a docking port doesn't require anything more than sacrificing a few square meters of outer hull, there's little point in not having one. It's not as if the outer hull has better uses! There are precious few portholes or visible weaponry or instrumentation to compete for the acreage... And the possibility of invisible sensors is sort of decreased by the use of very visible greeblies for hull sensors in basically every other Star Trek spacecraft.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
ncc-1701, ncc-1701-a, shane johnson, starship design

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.