RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,345
Posts: 5,445,093
Members: 24,966
Currently online: 566
Newest member: Borough 31

TrekToday headlines

Kruge Bobble Head
By: T'Bonz on Oct 30

Two Trek Actors In Green Room
By: T'Bonz on Oct 30

Trek UglyDolls First Look
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

New Star Trek Select Action Figure
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

Trek Actors In Elsa & Fred
By: T'Bonz on Oct 29

The Red Shirt Diaries #9
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Greenwood Cast In Truth
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Cumberbatch In Talks For Strange
By: T'Bonz on Oct 28

Two New Trek Bobble Heads
By: T'Bonz on Oct 27

Meaney On Playing Historical Figure Durant
By: T'Bonz on Oct 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Lounges & General Chat > Miscellaneous

Miscellaneous Discussion of non-Trek topics.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 26 2013, 01:39 PM   #1
BizarroStormy
Fleet Captain
 
BizarroStormy's Avatar
 
Location: Foxhot
About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

World War One's chemical weapons usage led to such brutal results that the vast majority of countries vowed never to repeat Germany's example. Other than Saddam's gassing of the Kurds and/or rebel Iraqi factions, wouldn't that make Syria the only nation to use chems against its opponents?

Defense Secretary Hagel believes there has likely been Syrian usage of the CWs, but indications are the US will hand over the ball to NATO or the United Nations.

Your opinions, please.....followed by what you would personally do if you were the United States. (Myself, I doubt I'd go to the UN.)
BizarroStormy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 27 2013, 01:46 AM   #2
Ghost of Sector 7
Rear Admiral
 
Ghost of Sector 7's Avatar
 
Location: Sector 7's Ghost
Send a message via AIM to Ghost of Sector 7
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

I think the right thing to do is get world support. Despite what some think, the US should not be a bully nation, nor should we foot the bill for everything which happens in the rest of the world. A coalition means shared expense, as well.
__________________
“When all Americans are treated as equal, no matter who they are or whom they love, we are all more free.” -Pres. Obama
"A great democracy does not make it harder to vote than to buy an assault weapon." -Pres. Clinton
Ghost of Sector 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 02:13 PM   #3
THE Robert Maxwell
Reports of my death...
 
THE Robert Maxwell's Avatar
 
Location: Robert Maxwell
View THE Robert Maxwell's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to THE Robert Maxwell Send a message via AIM to THE Robert Maxwell Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to THE Robert Maxwell Send a message via Yahoo to THE Robert Maxwell
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

There's no clear evidence such weapons were used at this point.

Were we to get involved, it should not consist of backing any particular armed faction. None of them are people we'd particularly want to be running a country--they are all Islamists of one flavor or another.

At most, we could help stem the humanitarian crisis, but we have a very poor track record of choosing sides to pick winners and losers. And getting involved in other people's civil wars is just a bad idea in general.
__________________
Publishing all the news that's not fit to print, FROM BEYOND THE GRAVE!!!!
I has a blag.
THE Robert Maxwell is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 03:21 PM   #4
Creepy Critter
Admiral
 
Creepy Critter's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

foxhot wrote: View Post
World War One's chemical weapons usage led to such brutal results that the vast majority of countries vowed never to repeat Germany's example. Other than Saddam's gassing of the Kurds and/or rebel Iraqi factions, wouldn't that make Syria the only nation to use chems against its opponents?
No.

What about Great Britain, Spain, Italy, and Japan, for starters? Though perhaps not themselves a nation at the time, what about the Russian Bolsheviks?

In addition, what about Agent Orange?

Or, are you arbitrarily restricting the list to nations that explicitly targeted people?
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Creepy Critter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 04:23 PM   #5
Ln X
Fleet Captain
 
Ln X's Avatar
 
Location: The great gig in the sky
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

It seems from reports that both the rebels and the Syrian government are using chemical weapons. The best option for the US would be to do nothing and let this civil war continue until both sides want a ceasefire and then call for international assistance.
__________________
Star Trek: The Approaching Shadow...

Caption contest: DS9
Ln X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30 2013, 02:45 AM   #6
Mr. B
Vice Admiral
 
Mr. B's Avatar
 
Location: New Orleans
Send a message via ICQ to Mr. B Send a message via AIM to Mr. B Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Mr. B Send a message via Yahoo to Mr. B
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

One observation I would make in reading and writing about this on a regular basis is the coverage about the new intelligence, and our politicians reactions to it, resembles the media drumbeat that proceeded the Iraq invasion.

Chemical weapons notwithstanding, it's no wonder the US or other foreign powers seem uninterested in doing anything. Some of the rebel fighting groups like Al-Nusra Front are linked to al-Qaeda, with several others in the realm of islamic extremism. Even if the makeup of the rebel forces was not a complete clusterfuck, there aren't any consistently held rebel areas to stage forces and supplies like their were in Libya
__________________
“Ridicule is the tribute paid to the genius by the mediocrities.”
-Oscar Wilde
Mr. B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2 2013, 10:21 AM   #7
RJDementia13
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
 
RJDementia13's Avatar
 
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
Re: About this small-scale chemical weapons usage in Syria

Chemical weapons have been used extensively in the last century. WWI didn't even begin to put an end to that.

As for Syria, there's no reason for the US to unilaterally intervene. It's not like Afghanistan, where an ally was invaded, or Iraq, where the invader of an ally was in violation of their terms of surrender. Syria would be another Vietnam, and end just as badly.

If the motivation is the humanitarian disaster, it needs to be the United Nations that intervenes. I would not be opposed to being part of a multinational force, as long as it were planned and executed competently.
__________________
Please stop by my Gallery and YouTube Page for a visit. And read Trunkards! And check out my Heroes essays.
RJDementia13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.