RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,202
Posts: 5,346,364
Members: 24,604
Currently online: 585
Newest member: LanCo96

TrekToday headlines

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

New Funko Trek Figure
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Saldana As A Role Model
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

San Diego Comic-Con Trek Fan Guide
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21

Cumberbatch As Turing
By: T'Bonz on Jul 21


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 25 2013, 03:17 AM   #1081
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Well, he hasn't gotten a thing right so far. Maybe he'll luck out with this.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 03:28 AM   #1082
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

beamMe wrote: View Post

As for Superman Returns: a good movie that for whatever reason didn't really click with the audiences, and we all know it killed the Superman film-franchise.
Oh, wait.
Well, your "oh, wait" is technically incorrect. Warner was disappointed with SR, and it spelled the end of Singer's carrying the Donner/Lester/Reeve series into the 21st century. That's what SR was--a very late sequel.

The new Superman film is a complete reboot, like the Nolan Batman movies had nothing to do with the Burton/Schumacher series of the 80s/90s. They are treated as completely different entities, which in both cases, gave the studio a clean slate to work from.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 03:30 AM   #1083
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Well, your "oh, wait" is technically incorrect.
It's not. Contradicting it requires wading into technicalities, though.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 03:38 AM   #1084
Out Of My Vulcan Mind
Vice Admiral
 
Out Of My Vulcan Mind's Avatar
 
Location: Wherever you go, there you are.
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

^^^
Which makes it technically incorrect. And there is a big difference between making a good enough return for a direct sequel and a return that leads the studio to put the franchise on hiatus and return years later with a reboot.
__________________
"I'll see you in another life, brother."
Out Of My Vulcan Mind is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 04:01 AM   #1085
Flake
Commodore
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Where does he get $37m from?

$9m Friday, +80%
$13m Saturday, +44%
$13m Sunday
$10m Monday -23.6%

$45m ! Based on ST09 percentages.
Flake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 04:04 AM   #1086
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Flake wrote: View Post
Where does he get $37m from?
Where did he get 110 million from last week?

Don't worry, he'll have completely accurate predictions for this weekend and an acute analysis of them all - sometime Tuesday.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 04:04 AM   #1087
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Well, your "oh, wait" is technically incorrect.
It's not. Contradicting it requires wading into technicalities, though.
I believe the member he responded to could be thinking more of a series, than the umbrella term of franchise.

As a series, "Oh, wait" would be applicable when an actual series suffers a bad film, but continues despite the flop. For example, The Man with the Golden Gun was not considered up to the box office standards of most of the Connery films, but Eon continued with the same series (in that case, the hit Spy Who Loved Me).

So, if anyone suggests Superman Returns "killed" the Superman film series, they are correct, as Singer was not charting new continuity (ex. a reboot like the new Spider-Man), but producing a sequel to an existing series.

The new Superman film starts from a clean slate--like a property new to film, aside from the name recognition, so its not tied to the effects/influence of the older series.
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 04:06 AM   #1088
Out Of My Vulcan Mind
Vice Admiral
 
Out Of My Vulcan Mind's Avatar
 
Location: Wherever you go, there you are.
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Flake wrote: View Post
Where does he get $37m from?

$9m Friday, +80%
$13m Saturday, +44%
$13m Sunday
$10m Monday -23.6%

$45m ! Based on ST09 percentages.
He's using a very low internal multiplier, way too low in my opinion. Star Trek had an unusually high multiplier. It would be great if STiD could match it, but it could be tough with this weekend's competition. But a regular multiplier for a film in its second weekend on MD weekend would lead to a $41-42 million 4-day take from a $9 million Friday. Hopefully the Friday number will be adjusted up a bit.

Edit to add: RTH on the BoxOffice.com forum is saying at the moment he's expecting a Friday take of $10-11.5 million for STiD. Guru's sources were better than RTH's numbers on the opening Friday. Hopefully this time it'll be the reverse. We'll just have to wait on the studio estimate to find out.
__________________
"I'll see you in another life, brother."

Last edited by Out Of My Vulcan Mind; May 25 2013 at 04:45 AM.
Out Of My Vulcan Mind is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 07:34 AM   #1089
Jeff O'Connor
Commodore
 
Jeff O'Connor's Avatar
 
Location: Tampa, FL
Send a message via AIM to Jeff O'Connor Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Jeff O'Connor
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

I like this thread. It's exciting.

__________________
Star Trek
1966-
Jeff O'Connor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 07:38 AM   #1090
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Jeff O'Connor wrote: View Post
I like this thread. It's exciting.
Indeed. Following this movie's box office is as exciting as the movie itself!
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 07:52 AM   #1091
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

To compare to the other movies on Friday. Here are rest of Rth's numbers

FF6 33-36m, now if it played like F5 it would be doing 40m but dont see that happening and from other estimates early neither does anyone else, THO3 13-15m,Epic 10m, So nothing thats much different atm to what has been reported elsewhere.
Think atm its (STID) got to be aleast 10, 10-11.5m
Very rough im3 prob around 5-6, tgg 4-5
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 09:03 AM   #1092
Tommunist
Lieutenant Commander
 
Location: Otisburg
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Ugh. Superman Returns. Is it a sequel? A reboot? Both?!

It made 400 Million or so worldwide. It's domestic numbers were close to that of Batman Begins. It still has a decent Rotten Tomatoes score. It looks beautiful, and Singer was respectful of the lore. I liked how Singer approached the old John Williams theme as "Star Wars" territory (how could you not have a film without it?!). (That said, I'm now ready for a new score, and like what I've heard from Hans so far!) Tracked well with female audiences.

But... Superman films were in development hell for a long while. When you consider the costs associated with pre-production of the earlier attempts (Tim Burton, JJ Abrams) and Singer's own budget, it still somehow was seen as a disappointment by the studio, instead of a respectable return and/or an investment in continuing the franchise. Batman Begins brought that film franchise back from the brink of creative and financial distress, leading to bigger/better things.

If given a sequel in 2009 or so, would Superman have done the same? Singer said he wanted to "Wrath of Khan" the sequel, with plenty of action. I'm of the mind that a sequel had the potential to reinvigorate the franchise. But perhaps the Returns story painted themselves into a a corner creatively (yes, the damn kid). In any event, it didn't happen. And we don't know the full extent the legal battles regarding copyright and ownership by the heirs of the creators had to do with this, but I'm confident it played a role.

The sad fact is that the story didn't service what needed to happen to continue. And I still have a soft spot for it (as a footnote on the Reeve films).

Yes, off track here. But trying to swing it back to Trek. Trek was dead before the Abrams film of 09. Big director, along with big money menat a big spectacle film that put Trek back into the front burners of pop culture. But will it ever be "Avengers" big? Nope.

And I liked the sequel. It's making good money so far (including the ever increasingly important foreign market) and hopefully it has legs. And like Superman Returns, it has a pretty good critical and fan response (internet boards notwithstanding!) Hopefully Paramount has appropriate expectations of what the franchise can accomplish.

While I'm aware of the fiancial results of these big films, at some point, I've begun to care less. I find it odd in myself and others that fans become "armchair bean-counters" for multi-billion dollar conglomerates who will churn out hundreds of films a year, in which quality of storytelling is not the most important aspect of the film business. Nor do I feel crestfallen if a film that I enjoy is considered by some "a flop". What does matter to me is my friends, family and peers: I enjoy sharing movies, TV and music I enjoy with people. And of course, groups of like minded "internet pals" who I may not actually know, but can see they have the same passion and can articulate what they like and dislike about. Factions and camps of "pro" this or "anti" that degrade into name calling and insults can induce a chuckle maybe, but tire quickly. Marvel vs DC! Trek vs Wars! Pepsi vs Coke! Chevy vs Ford! Liberal vs Conservative! Meh... it gets old.

I think that's why I can enjoy the Red Letter Media review for STiD but still disagree; they bring something to the table. Nothing that hasn't already been brought by the fine posters here though.

There will be a third Trek film. Hopefully for the 50th anniversary. Lessons learned on the business side may help give a kick in the pants to the creative side to satisfy the studios, the general film audience AND long-time Trek fans...

Last edited by Tommunist; May 25 2013 at 09:09 AM. Reason: I can't word good
Tommunist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 09:21 AM   #1093
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

I never got the SR hate, I liked it. It wasn't a stellar movie by any means, but it was fairly entertaining - even if Luthor's plot was dumb as shit - and I did think it was a beautiful movie.
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 10:37 AM   #1094
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Well, your "oh, wait" is technically incorrect.
It's not. Contradicting it requires wading into technicalities, though.
I believe the member he responded to could be thinking more of a series, than the umbrella term of franchise.

As a series, "Oh, wait" would be applicable when an actual series suffers a bad film, but continues despite the flop. For example, The Man with the Golden Gun was not considered up to the box office standards of most of the Connery films, but Eon continued with the same series (in that case, the hit Spy Who Loved Me).

So, if anyone suggests Superman Returns "killed" the Superman film series, they are correct, as Singer was not charting new continuity (ex. a reboot like the new Spider-Man), but producing a sequel to an existing series.

The new Superman film starts from a clean slate--like a property new to film, aside from the name recognition, so its not tied to the effects/influence of the older series.
See, technicalities.
beamMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 25 2013, 10:53 AM   #1095
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: STID "tracking" for $85-90 million opening [U.S. box office]

Rth just posted these new numbers for Friday

FF6 should do 36- 37,THO3 14.5,STID 10, Epic 8.5-9, IM3 5,TGG 4
__________________
=)
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:00 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.