RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,408
Posts: 5,359,623
Members: 24,630
Currently online: 580
Newest member: DasGeneral


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 28 2013, 05:20 AM   #46
degra
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

well we'll just have to agree to disagree. The mysteries were far more involving than the characters. Some of the characters were fun to watch,,,,Juliet, sawyer, sun,,,looking back much like with bsg and post season two heroes,,,losts cumbersome mythology got in the way and distracted for me from the characters. Season two is tied with season six as the series worst. By Season two the flashbacks felt like writers spinning wheels, didn't care for the writers turning Charlie and Locke into assholes, the tailies story dragged on, too much time was spent on the swan station, the Hurley,Libby romance was lackluster same for sawyer and Ana lucias tryst.
degra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 07:43 AM   #47
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

I disagree with a large portion of your post, and if I thought there was anything to be gained by going into the specifics, I'd spend the time to do so, but I suspect that neither of us is likely to influence the others' opinion.

Though I will say the whole point of the Sawyer-Ana Lucia thing was that she wanted his gun. I thought that was pretty damn obvious.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 11:02 AM   #48
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Season 2 ended in a reboot.

Season 2 introduces the tailies. They are all subsequently killed (except for Bernard).
Season 2 gets us into the hatch. The hatch is subsequently blown up.
Season 2 introduces the necessity of entering the numbers. Not entering them has no legitimate consequences.
Michael spends the entire season looking for Walt. Once found, we are never told why Walt was important to the Others.
Season 2 shows us a map of the island in the hatch. We are never told how this map happened (nor why a smoke monster needs "vents", given what we now know about the smoke monster).
Season 2 ends with Penelope finding the island. But then the boat that shows up is "Not Penny's".
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 12:53 PM   #49
Praetorian
Captain
 
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Hum, I thought the statue had four toes because it was a statue of Anubis...a half jackal half man god... (even if real life Anubis statues have 5 toes, that explanation is good enough for me...)
__________________
E Pluribus Unum!
Praetorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 03:49 PM   #50
jayceee
Commander
 
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Decided to watch the season 4 dvd set in a marathon session yesterday and earlier this morning. (Found the dvd set at a church rummage sale awhile ago for $2, but haven't watched it previously. I don't have any of the other seasons on dvd, other than the pilot).

I never really watched Lost, other than watching the pilot episode previously.

Despite not knowing much about the details of the show, I found season 4 somewhat compelling to watch. There were several scenes which I suspect would require some knowledge of previous seasons for context, but overall I thought season 4 was watchable as a standalone.
jayceee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 05:44 PM   #51
Gary7
Rear Admiral
 
Gary7's Avatar
 
Location: Near Manhattan ··· in an alternate reality
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Mr Light wrote: View Post
It's been awhile, but the end of the last episode they did explain all the major stuff. The only left unexplained was Widmore's change of heart or why whatshisname from S:AAB was building the cabin.

We found out what and why the Island is, and why and how the plane crashed.
No, they didn't explain all the major stuff. This is what has people like degra all up in arms about it. The only way I could enjoy the series was to let go of wanting to know all of the answers. But frankly, I would've liked to know a few things:
  • MIB doesn't start out evil. He knows that his and Jacob's mother is not their maternal mother; that she essentially kidnapped them. So, he craves to go back to live with his people, but his mother decides to kill all of his people just to spite him. SHE was the evil one, and spurned on MIB to take revenge on her, cementing his rage.
  • So why would an evil mother be charged with taking care of the "light of the Island", some kind of super power wellspring? By whom?
  • Is the island the heart of the Earth? If this "light of the Island" is the critical wellspring to all life on Earth, why would there be such a slipshod arrangement of protecting it? Seems like there should be a much more formidable people doing it and with high moral standards.
  • Jacob tells his brother (MIB) that he can't leave the island. Yet, HE is able to leave. Why is this? How is such an arbitrary discrimination enacted?
  • So we have these 3 people--the mother and her two sons--living on this special island. The "evil" son kills his evil mother, and Jacob is charged by his mother with keeping his brother from leaving. Why does the mother care what happens outside of the island anyway?
  • All you have to do is drink a cup of water from the island's stream, handed to you by someone who was bestowed caretaker powers over the island. "Now you're like me." OK, great. Being bestowed this guardianship gives a kind of immortality. Why not give everybody a drink? Then everyone could leave the island in an instant, in addition to immortality. Of course, this would ruin the story... and to foil it, just make the powers only transferable instead of copied. But this caveat isn't shown. Looked pretty silly to me. Also... why no VFX on drinking it, like a momentary glowing aura around the person? Looked pretty silly to just drink and "wallah!"--you've got powers!
  • So despite all that Ben and his cohorts learn about the Dharma Initiative, they remain clueless about "the hatch" (Swan station)? They have no idea that some crazy cockamamie Dharma experiment was conceived to have people conscripted into tediously entering in a code every 108 minutes, which has a critical action of alleviating "magnetic pressure"? Not doing so results in catastrophic earthquakes? I don't get it... this was so stupidly risky.
  • You'd think with the Dharma Initiative they would've had a fail safe... that after scaring the sh*t out of the test subjects in the Swan and the start of magnetic chaos, that a back-up procedure would automatically perform the magnetic "alleviation". It would've made so much sense rather than risk the safety of the entire island if someone goofs up. And what should have happened is that there would be some uncovering of this. At the Pearl station, they would've found some evidence of the fail safe but then discover that it has become faulty... if you DON'T enter the code, everything will fall apart.
I can understand how the island is something special, but we don't know WHY it is so. Its special nature attracts people to go there, seeking out its power. Ancient peoples, including the Egyptians, find their way to it. MIB's fellow people were inventive and figuring out a way to harness the power of the island, ultimately to find a way off of it and travel the world. But they were wiped out. Then centuries later, the Dharma Initiative comes along, attempting to do the same thing. Jacob has them wiped out, using Ben and his team to do the dirty work. But not before the Dharma scientists had already dug deep enough to expose the dangerous magnetic properties of the island. It seems silly given Jacob's power that he couldn't have stopped that from happening much sooner.

One could say this whole thing was an analogy to how the inventive nature of humans is a dangerous power and improperly wielded could destroy everything. But, it's set in a bizarre story that doesn't have much at all to explain it.

Why 4 toes instead of 5? Who cares. Maybe it was a comedic Egyptian settlement, the fore bearers of cartoons. This pales in comparison to knowing the real deal... why we have this very peculiar small arrangement of people with special powers and no explanation as to how they were bestowed and by whom.

If there's anything LOST left as a gaping hole in its entire story, it's this. And I feel the writers, namely Lindelof and Cuse, backed themselves into a time pressure corner and couldn't figure out how to clean it all up. So they fell back on "it's all about the characters" bit. Mind you, they were seriously influenced by "The Prisoner", intending to leave a lot of people confused at the end, because heck... look at all the chatter that continued for decades after "The Prisoner" was over. They wanted to repeat that... have their own historical stake in television history. And it worked. Good for them. Not so good for the intelligent audience that isn't just along for the ride but wants a well crafted story.
__________________
Remembering Ensign Mallory.

Last edited by Gary7; April 28 2013 at 06:07 PM.
Gary7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 08:02 PM   #52
Mr Light
Admiral
 
Location: Pennsylvania
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

They explained in the show that the Island is the wellspring of all life/souls on Earth, so destroying the Island would destroy all life on Earth. There is only one protector given immortality, and one guard dog given immortality, they can't just make everyone immortal.

Someone had to manually punch the Number into the Swan because the anomaly disturbed the electrical equipment and automation couldn't be trusted.

I will admit one odd plot hole in the series is the fact that the Others let Desmond stay down in the Swan alone pushing the button, knowing (?) that the fate of the world hung in the balance if he didn't. What if he killed himself? What if he overslept? What if he slipped in the shower and broke his neck?

My fan-wank to this is that since they were watching him on the video the entire time, they were ready to rush into the station the moment they saw Des go down.
__________________

Mr Light is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 28 2013, 09:41 PM   #53
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Gary7 wrote: View Post
I feel the writers, namely Lindelof and Cuse, backed themselves into a time pressure corner and couldn't figure out how to clean it all up. So they fell back on "it's all about the characters" bit.
This is what bothers me. Lindelof is a terrible writer, pure and simple. He's responsible not only for the giant question mark that is LOST, but his stamp is also on "Cowboys and Aliens" and "Prometheus". I'm fearful because he's been given a writing credit on the new Star Trek movie.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 03:43 AM   #54
degra
Fleet Captain
 
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

I just expected them to do something really interesting with all these threads,,,the way ds9 did in the final chapter. Good and great writers not only meet audience expectations but exceed them in how they wrap up a story. Lost did neither but then again that is what happens when you allow overgrown fanboys to produce tv and films these days.
degra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 29 2013, 06:23 PM   #55
jbohn
Commander
 
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

Mr Light wrote: View Post
To be fair, Ana-Lucia and Libby and Eko were supposed to around longer but they were prematurely written off for drunk driving / actor problems
If memory serves me well, Libby wasn't supposed to be killed off at the same time as Ana-Lucia who was always intended to be killed off near the end of season 2, but because most fans didn't like the Ana-Lucia, the writers knew that nobody would care when she was shot, so they added Libby to that scene as well to up the shock value.

Whatever loose plans they had for Libby's character were given to other characters down the road. And we never did find out much more about Libby and why she was in the asylum and why she was in dealings with Widmore and why she gave him her boat. Presumably he needed the boat and maybe The Others had a hand in killing Libby's husband?
__________________
----
jbohn
jbohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30 2013, 05:23 PM   #56
Ryan8bit
Commodore
 
Ryan8bit's Avatar
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: Lost as an one-season miniseries

If characters in the show are having to reiterate what the show was about all along, chances are that they failed at some point at just letting it happen naturally. Pretty much the same thing happened in Voyager, and it was considered poor writing then too.
Ryan8bit is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.