RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,243
Posts: 5,348,296
Members: 24,610
Currently online: 640
Newest member: CptRoLorne

TrekToday headlines

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

A Baby For Saldana
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

Klingon Beer Arrives In The US
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Star Trek: Prelude To Axanar
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22

Abrams Announces Star Wars: Force For Change Sweepstakes
By: T'Bonz on Jul 22


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 142 19.22%
A 160 21.65%
A- 99 13.40%
B+ 82 11.10%
B 58 7.85%
B- 27 3.65%
C+ 40 5.41%
C 38 5.14%
C- 24 3.25%
D+ 11 1.49%
D 13 1.76%
D- 10 1.35%
F 35 4.74%
Voters: 739. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 16 2013, 07:31 PM   #4261
Opus
Commodore
 
Opus's Avatar
 
Location: Bloom County
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Yeah, LeVar Burton's complaints sound like sour grapes that TNG movies are done.
__________________
Now that I've seen it, and have also had time to mellow, to really think about it, I now find it absolutely, unbearably repulsive in every way except for some of the acting. - about The Wrath of Khan. Interstat, Issue 62: 1982
Opus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2013, 11:25 PM   #4262
CorporalCaptain
Vice Admiral
 
CorporalCaptain's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Any word yet on where R2-D2 is?
__________________
John
CorporalCaptain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 12:28 AM   #4263
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Opus wrote: View Post
Yeah, LeVar Burton's complaints sound like sour grapes that TNG movies are done.
If a veteran actor praises the films, he/she "is a class act". If a veteran actor criticizes the film, he/she "is bitter" or "butthurt".
__________________
lol
l
/\
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 12:40 AM   #4264
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Opus wrote: View Post
Yeah, LeVar Burton's complaints sound like sour grapes that TNG movies are done.
If a veteran actor praises the films, he/she "is a class act". If a veteran actor criticizes the film, he/she "is bitter" or "butthurt".
I don't understand why people care one way or the other what an unemployed actor thinks. I don't give two shits what Shatner or Nimoy or Stewart or any other prior Trek actor thinks of these films.

I don't need their stamp of approval for how I feel one way or the other.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 01:02 AM   #4265
Ryan8bit
Commodore
 
Ryan8bit's Avatar
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I like seeing what they think regardless of if I agree or not. Sometimes I like reading / watching the opinions of actors I have respected. I can't really say I agree with Burton because, well, it was really just a comment to a TMZ reporter that he made in 30 seconds in getting into his car. It's hard to even understand what he means by there needing to be more Gene in the movie, exactly.

But it didn't strike me as sour grapes either because the interviewer said something along the lines of, "They should've put you in the movie." Burton said they didn't need him.
Ryan8bit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 02:09 AM   #4266
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
If a veteran actor praises the films, he/she "is a class act". If a veteran actor criticizes the film, he/she "is bitter" or "butthurt".
You post that as if there isn't a reasonable likelihood that it's both sensible and entirely true.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 02:25 AM   #4267
throwback
Captain
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Does this mean that Gene Wilder, who played Willy Wonka in Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, described Burton's Charlie and the Chocolate Factory as an insult?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/0...n_3441496.html

Is the argument being made that the opinion of employed thespians should be respected, while their unemployed brethren should be given less respect? Considering the life that these people live, which varies from periods of unemployment to employment, and back again, how is this a sound argument?
throwback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 02:33 AM   #4268
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: In the 23rd Century...
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

throwback wrote: View Post

Is the argument being made that the opinion of employed thespians should be respected, while their unemployed brethren should be given less respect?
No. It means I don't give a shit what people think who weren't involved in the production. It also means that an actors motives may be suspect we they evaluate a property that they are no longer collecting a paycheck from.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 04:30 AM   #4269
Ryan8bit
Commodore
 
Ryan8bit's Avatar
 
Location: St. Paul, MN
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I think my favorite example of someone who was previously involved with a production commenting on films made after he was no longer involved would be James Cameron and the Terminator films. He said that the soup had been pissed in by the other directors. I doubt it had anything to do with being bitter or caring about paychecks.
Ryan8bit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 04:43 AM   #4270
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
throwback wrote: View Post

Is the argument being made that the opinion of employed thespians should be respected, while their unemployed brethren should be given less respect?
No. It means I don't give a shit what people think who weren't involved in the production. It also means that an actors motives may be suspect we they evaluate a property that they are no longer collecting a paycheck from.
Because the people who were involved in the making of the film will speak their honest opinion on it?

For example, I honestly do not believe that Simon Pegg would be so glowing about JJTrek if he were just a viewer. I can't know his mind, but I just don't buy it.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 05:45 AM   #4271
Ovation
Vice Admiral
 
Location: La Belle Province or The Green Mountain State (depends on the day of the week)
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tosk wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
throwback wrote: View Post

Is the argument being made that the opinion of employed thespians should be respected, while their unemployed brethren should be given less respect?
No. It means I don't give a shit what people think who weren't involved in the production. It also means that an actors motives may be suspect we they evaluate a property that they are no longer collecting a paycheck from.
Because the people who were involved in the making of the film will speak their honest opinion on it?

For example, I honestly do not believe that Simon Pegg would be so glowing about JJTrek if he were just a viewer. I can't know his mind, but I just don't buy it.
Why? What specifically makes you think Pegg is lying or being disingenuous? Your own dislike of the films is NOT an applicable piece of evidence here.
Ovation is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 05:50 AM   #4272
CommishSleer
Fleet Captain
 
CommishSleer's Avatar
 
Location: Way back of nowhere
View CommishSleer's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tosk wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
throwback wrote: View Post

Is the argument being made that the opinion of employed thespians should be respected, while their unemployed brethren should be given less respect?
No. It means I don't give a shit what people think who weren't involved in the production. It also means that an actors motives may be suspect we they evaluate a property that they are no longer collecting a paycheck from.
Because the people who were involved in the making of the film will speak their honest opinion on it?

For example, I honestly do not believe that Simon Pegg would be so glowing about JJTrek if he were just a viewer. I can't know his mind, but I just don't buy it.
How can you really say that ?
Do you know him personally ?

I can pull some of that out of the air too. I say Zoe Saldana will say STID sucks in 4 years time, Pine will say its good, Yelchen will say it was the worst mistake of his like and Urban (T'm going to see him soon) will say is was fantastic. My interpretation of other people's opinion is just as valid as yours and just as ridiculous.

Also I don't mind that anyone says any Star Trek movie could do with a bit more Gene in it.
At least Burton knew Gene and may had some sort of idea how he thought.
But Gene always went with the money. And he was always prepared to ditch old Star Trek in favour of new Star Trek. He had no problem with ditching TOS in favour of TNG canon. And I agree (reluctantly) that the living Star Trek must have priority over the old. That doesn't necessarily mean the new is better than the old.
CommishSleer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 11:46 AM   #4273
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Ovation wrote: View Post
Your own dislike of the films is NOT an applicable piece of evidence here.
What evidence? I make no claim to the truth of the matter, I only expressed an opinion. And why do you assume I didn't like it?

Ovation wrote: View Post
Why? What specifically makes you think Pegg is lying or being disingenuous?
I am only basing it on the kind of fan he is (as I perceive him). His public opinions over the years about other films and TV shows, I am extrapolating from that. Scotty's funpark waterslide in ST11 strikes me as exactly the kind of thing he would have made fun of when asked for his nerd opinion in an issue of SFX. And I'm not saying he's a liar...I just think that he just knows (as most actors do) that it's bad form to shit on a film you're in.

But I could be wrong, obviously. Every actor who was interviewed for ST11 or ST12 may honestly love every artistic decision made on the films. It's possible.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 02:45 PM   #4274
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Tosk wrote: View Post
But I could be wrong, obviously. Every actor who was interviewed for ST11 or ST12 may honestly love every artistic decision made on the films.
Yes, and yes.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2013, 05:27 PM   #4275
The Keeper
Commodore
 
The Keeper's Avatar
 
Location: Where reality ends and illusion begins
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Eh, anyone else remember the stink Quinto's comments raised?

Revisiting that now, I get the same sense I had back in the day - he didn't entirely agree with some creative decision[s] made for ID & please don't shoot him if you don't like it or it under performs at the BO.
The Keeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.