RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,521
Posts: 5,512,136
Members: 25,138
Currently online: 480
Newest member: Tosty82

TrekToday headlines

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 144 19.20%
A 161 21.47%
A- 101 13.47%
B+ 83 11.07%
B 59 7.87%
B- 27 3.60%
C+ 40 5.33%
C 38 5.07%
C- 25 3.33%
D+ 11 1.47%
D 13 1.73%
D- 10 1.33%
F 38 5.07%
Voters: 750. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 30 2013, 06:45 AM   #3886
SantaSpock
Fleet Captain
 
SantaSpock's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View SantaSpock's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

donners22 wrote: View Post
Set Harth wrote: View Post
donners22 wrote: View Post
TOS was a product of its era, which was nearly 50 years ago. Society has changed drastically since then, and things which were acceptable then are far less so now.
Who cares?

I'll take a STID which is consistent with TOS on this issue over a STID which conforms to modern political correctness in a bid for "acceptance".
Right, so it's okay to change characterisation, themes and technology from the original series, but it's not okay to evolve from outdated depictions of women?

Films are made in order to make money. Females make up half of the population. Alienating women is counterproductive to making money. Having several reviews highlighting the issue could turn away potential viewers.

An argument that the film does not depict women poorly and that the reviews got it wrong is a reasonable response. An argument which is simply a justification that it's okay because TOS did it is ludicrous.
Look I don't know what the big deal is.
Sure I wish the bikini shot wasn't in it.

But look at the outfits Troi wore in TNG and just about any guest female, look at the catsuits of 7 and T'Pol. The whole T'Pol/Trip story line - yes Trip is very important so I will give him naked massages scenario.

At least Marcus was rejecting Kirk when she was bikini clad.

The few women portrayed in STID were scientists or fired guns, went on landing parties. Not relying on men to protect them all the time as it was in TNG and ENT and TOS
SantaSpock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 07:40 AM   #3887
GMDreia
Commander
 
GMDreia's Avatar
 
Location: SF Bay Area
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Eh. I know that a lot of other women were offended by the Carol Marcus undies scene, but IMO, it was a throwaway scene and wasn't any longer than we saw in the trailers. You also see what an immature tomcat Kirk still is because of his reaction.

I'm more weirded out by the scene's gratuitous use in the trailer than its actual use, in context, in the movie.

I also feel that "Uhura in Love" is actually pretty progressive. Up to now, we've only seen professional, strong women as having to give up love. Uhura is devoted to her boyfriend but she's still a professional officer and conducts herself accordingly. She and Spock have an equal relationship as partners. She does show her emotions, but she also acts like a grownup and does her job. I don't see the problem. The idea that professional women have to be emotionless spinsters is outdated. In the end, too, Uhura was there to help finish the job of subduing Khan, she was not the damsel in distress.

The women in STID were all there because of their brains and competence and Uhura was as competent with a phaser as any of the men. The women weren't glorified secretaries and glorified switchboard operators (like in TOS) or touchy feely mother figures (like in TNG).

I really don't see the problem. If you look at it in a certain light, STID was in some ways more progressive in its handling of women than previous Trek has managed to be.
__________________
I am the user formerly known as Fascinoma
GMDreia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 11:11 AM   #3888
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

spsblue wrote: View Post
Just about recovered from an hour or so panic attack induced by watching STiD, and the shear wrongness of the casting.....

Still too angry and stressed to post coherently at this point.
Breathe and tell yourself its just a movie.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 11:16 AM   #3889
Belz...
Fleet Captain
 
Belz...'s Avatar
 
Location: In a finely-crafted cosmos... of my own making.
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

spsblue wrote: View Post
Just about recovered from an hour or so panic attack induced by watching STiD, and the shear wrongness of the casting.....
I do hope you come back and expand on this. What's wrong with the casting ?
__________________
And that's my opinion.
Belz... is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:01 PM   #3890
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Speaking as a devil's advocate here since I love TWOK...is Montablban's Khan rather low key during half the movie until frustration sets in? Is it also not a shame that Kirk and Khan never meet in person in TWOK? If Khan were really bent on revenge from ground one, would he approach Kirk in such a gentlemenly manner as he does when he first tells Kirk he wants revenge upon him and also the Genesis device? So is Cumberbatch's Khan a better modern villian? He has a slow, stewing anger when he actually talks to Kirk and McCoy, but when he first appears, his guns are blazing(Starfleet HQ, then Kronos)...really taking that revenge seriously.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan

Last edited by RAMA; May 30 2013 at 01:13 PM.
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:05 PM   #3891
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

BillJ wrote: View Post
spsblue wrote: View Post
Just about recovered from an hour or so panic attack induced by watching STiD, and the shear wrongness of the casting.....

Still too angry and stressed to post coherently at this point.
Breathe and tell yourself its just a movie.

Of all the things I like about STID, casting might be right at the top. From one of my favorite actors: Cumberbatch, to Frickin' Peter Weller(Buckaroo Banzai is an Admiral!!), as well as some of the smaller roles(and some very cute girls as Starfleet officers). The regular cast is impeccable, and Greenwood as Pike is still one of my favorite characters in Trek history.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:05 PM   #3892
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:11 PM   #3893
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
In TWOK, Kirk and Khan never even meet in person, even though Kirk is the hero and Khan is the villain. That left the audience totally confused. Bad film.

A missed opportunity...and I'm saying did STID do it RIGHT...making Khan more fierce as well as meeting Kirk in person. Khan even uses Kirk as a means to an end in STID...but then viciously attacks him. It feels like the movie one upped TWOK.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:26 PM   #3894
Mad Jack Wolfe
Lieutenant Commander
 
Mad Jack Wolfe's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

spsblue wrote: View Post
Just about recovered from an hour or so panic attack induced by watching STiD, and the shear wrongness of the casting.....

Still too angry and stressed to post coherently at this point.
Yikes. And to think I spent all that time very mildly annoyed about not putting quite enough salt on my popcorn when I could have been raging over... nothing?
__________________
Life is full of disappointments. For instance, I really hoped "Chariots of Fire" would be a remake of "Ben Hur" with flame throwers.
Mad Jack Wolfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 01:46 PM   #3895
throwback
Captain
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

TWoK established that both characters had a backstory. If an audience member wanted to see that backstory, he or she could buy a VHS copy of Space Seed. (In conjunction with the movie, Paramount had released a VHS copy of the episode.) [http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Star...ies_%28VHS%29]

Classic Trek Khan was a ruler of people. As a successful ruler - who never experienced internal dissension in his territory - , he had to have the ability to negotiate for what he wanted.

I think using Khan was a mistake. Khan isn't the Joker. What is the Joker? He is a master criminal who is a nemesis to Batman. Nolan could craft a Joker whose backstory we never learn and make a film that works, regardless of the plot holes. Both characters were born into, lived in, and worked in a world of the same technologically level.

What is Khan? He is the product of the Eugenics Movement in 20th Century Earth, who with hundreds of others managed to conquer both Asia and the Middle East. Their inability to be satisfied with their conquest lead to the Eugenics War, where they were out competing each other to be the top dog. How does one work that into a film, without boring the hell out of a contemporary audience?
** First, there has to be an explanation for what Eugenics is. I doubt very many nowadays would know what the Eugenics Movement was.
** Then, there has to be a reason why a person in the 23rd century should be afraid of a man and his small band of followers from the 20th century. They are outmatched technologically. (The only reason that Khan was able to commandeer the Enterprise is because Kirk, acting like a fool, gave Khan access to the engineering specs on the starship. Even Spock questioned Kirk's judgement on that one.) It was believable in the 1960s that a man and his followers could escape with nary a record trace. It is less so today, where it seems every action of ours is being tracked and recorded. Even our choice of entertainment is leaving a record of us behind for someone to find. We are losing anonymity for the sake of advancing our technology. Realistically, if a 23rd century ship came upon the SS Botany Bay, the crew would identify the occupants and quarantine those people asap.
** Thirdly, the 23rd century would have means to counter the superiority of Khan. The purpose of Eugenics was to create people who were superior. Well, technology augmented to our living frames can do the job just as well. So, there would be a fight between naturally augmented humans and cybernetic augmented humans. Would that excite the audience to see this fight? And would this still be Star Trek?

I feel the threat of Khan reflected the fears of people who grew up in the WW II era where people knew about the Eugenics Movement of NAZI Germany and the fear of Asian imperialism coming into America were commonplace.

Iron Man 3 faced a similar challenge with the Mandarin. The Mandarin reflected the fears of 1960s America - fears that didn't make sense to a contemporary audience. So, the filmmakers took a risky step with the character, and upended the whole Mandarin character arc.
throwback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 02:12 PM   #3896
SantaSpock
Fleet Captain
 
SantaSpock's Avatar
 
Location: CommishSleer
View SantaSpock's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Mad Jack Wolfe wrote: View Post
spsblue wrote: View Post
Just about recovered from an hour or so panic attack induced by watching STiD, and the shear wrongness of the casting.....

Still too angry and stressed to post coherently at this point.
Yikes. And to think I spent all that time very mildly annoyed about not putting quite enough salt on my popcorn when I could have been raging over... nothing?
I approve of the rage. At least he/she is passionate about Star Trek.
But its the same cast as 2009. Has the rage been going on for 4 years? Cool.
I myself rage over Kirk's death in GEN but the rage comes and goes. I'm still able to post though. Some days I forget about it and just get on with life.
SantaSpock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 02:15 PM   #3897
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

CommishSleer wrote: View Post
Some days I forget about it and just get on with life.
Then your obviously not a "true believer"!
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 02:51 PM   #3898
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Critical check-in: IMDB audience rating is still 8.3 after 10,000 more votes since the last I checked.

Roten Tamatoes: An amazing 201 out of 231 reviews are fresh, if it wasn't for ST09's off-the-charts score, this would be spectacular.
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 03:31 PM   #3899
J.A. Morris
Ensign
 
Location: Virginia
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I liked it a lot, gave it an A in the poll. But I wish they could find a way to make a ST movie that finds the happy medium between "cerebral" and "2 hrs of blowing $h!t up".
J.A. Morris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 30 2013, 03:41 PM   #3900
Borgminister
Moderator
 
Location: California
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

That would have to be low budget and play to the local art houses, unfortunately...
Borgminister is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.