RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,901
Posts: 5,387,356
Members: 24,717
Currently online: 583
Newest member: teriankhoka

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing November Trek Comic
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Pegg/Wright Trilogy In The Works
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Star Trek: The Compendium Rebate Details
By: T'Bonz on Aug 20

Gold Key Archives Volume 2
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Takei Documentary Wins Award
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Cumberbatch To Voice Khan
By: T'Bonz on Aug 19

Shaun And Ed On Phineas and Ferb
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

New Ships Coming From Official Starships Collection
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Trek Stars Take On Ice Bucket Challenge
By: T'Bonz on Aug 18

Retro Review: Profit and Lace
By: Michelle on Aug 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies XI+

Star Trek Movies XI+ Discuss J.J. Abrams' rebooted Star Trek here.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
A+ 144 19.38%
A 161 21.67%
A- 100 13.46%
B+ 82 11.04%
B 58 7.81%
B- 27 3.63%
C+ 40 5.38%
C 38 5.11%
C- 24 3.23%
D+ 11 1.48%
D 13 1.75%
D- 10 1.35%
F 35 4.71%
Voters: 743. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 12 2013, 11:34 AM   #1666
Pindar
Rear Admiral
 
Pindar's Avatar
 
Location: 76 Totters Lane
View Pindar's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I am not convinced that the Vengeance was actually hidden or being built in secret.

If the head of Starfleet (I think that's what Marcus was meant to be) wants to commission a new class of ship who's going to argue with him.

Certainly the project was classified but he had it sitting on his desk in plain view.
Pindar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 11:36 AM   #1667
daedalus5
Moderator
 
daedalus5's Avatar
 
Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Well, I went to great lengths to avoid spoilers, trailers, even hanging up my Mod coat here last week to avoid anybody on the BBS blurting out the news. It *nearly* got spoiled when I went to the toilet just before the screening as people were talking about it and I asked them to please don't (thankfully they laughed and agreed! ). PHEW!

I saw the film on IMAX 3D.

It was A+ ratign for me - absolutely awesome. I loved the reversal TWOK when it was Kirk dying and not Spock - although I guessed the Khan blood tribble revival thing at that moment. Very cynical of me, would have been better if they killed Kirk off and then brought him back in the next movie.

I had no idea about Khan at all - I thought they did a great job of hiding him as Harrison. Absolutely brilliant. Spocks "Khaaaan" was a joy.

I also loved the very small tips of the hat, such as the exploded moon of Praxis, D4 cruisers, the model ships etc.

One of the highlights was the Enterprise comming out from the water and later from the cloud line. Beautiful shots. The Dreadnought crashing into the planet was also great. I thought for a moment the Enterprise was going to saucer separate and be destroyed and for them to get a "-A" starship.

The ending, whereby they did the whole "Space the final frontier" followed by the Alexander Courage music was also pretty awesome.

Best bit - Nimoy cameo - I had no idea that was going to happen and I was smiling throughout.

The previous night I had watched the 2009 film so it married together perfectly.

I shall see it again, but won't bother too much with the 3D expense - big screen is enough for me.

I wholeheartedly recommend it to you.
__________________
www.bookmooch.com
"Give books away. Get books you want." Fantastic website!
daedalus5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 11:40 AM   #1668
donners22
Commodore
 
donners22's Avatar
 
Location: Victoria, Australia
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

M wrote: View Post
Ulva wrote: View Post
<snap>

This is just an action film with a Starfleet communicator pin on it.
Very eloquently put post. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said. I'm still surprised this seems to be so popular with fans.
There seems to be an attitude that we should be grateful that there is a successful film with the Star Trek brand on it after years of insignificance or failure.

I enjoyed and own every series; last I checked, the DVDs don't disappear just because there isn't any Trek being released.

I'll assess the new films on their merits - I quite liked this one - but I feel no sense of obligation to do so out of the mere fact that they exist.
__________________
Kim: I'm detecting some weird technobabble.
Janeway: A possibly dangerous anomaly that we know nothing about?
Kim: Yeah. I suppose we should steer clear.
Janeway: Ha! Good one, Ensign. Take us in, Mr. Paris.

http://www.fiveminute.net/voyager
donners22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 12:26 PM   #1669
ROBE
Commander
 
ROBE's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Kirk had four silver bars before and after he lost command of the Enterprise and the captain of the USS Bradbury had four silver. So I presume this shows either rank or position of captain.
I would like to see an official rank table so we knew for sure.
I noticed that Noel Clarke's character had a different cap and his badge like the honour guards was plain, so I presume they were ratings/enlisted?
ROBE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 12:39 PM   #1670
King Daniel Into Darkness
Admiral
 
King Daniel Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: England again
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Last night, BBC2 in England aired "The Star Trek Story", a documentry from the mid-1990's which did it's very best to paint Trek fans as complete freaks. Nichelle Nicols sang a lot. They recycled parts of Trekkies (the woman who went to jury duty in her TNG uniform, the guys dressing as Klingons). A girl read her K/S slash fanfic. If the film flops here (and I saw it with a grand total of 14 other people on opening day), blame them.
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
King Daniel Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 01:04 PM   #1671
ROBE
Commander
 
ROBE's Avatar
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

I knew a postman who passed out on a hot day and when he was examined they found he was wearing a TNG command uniform under is Royal Mail uniform.
ROBE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 01:12 PM   #1672
Flake
Commodore
 
Location: Manchester, UK
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

King Daniel wrote: View Post
Last night, BBC2 in England aired "The Star Trek Story", a documentry from the mid-1990's which did it's very best to paint Trek fans as complete freaks. Nichelle Nicols sang a lot. They recycled parts of Trekkies (the woman who went to jury duty in her TNG uniform, the guys dressing as Klingons). A girl read her K/S slash fanfic. If the film flops here (and I saw it with a grand total of 14 other people on opening day), blame them.
Ugh glad I missed it, though I have a suspicion I will have watched it already on one of the BBCs Star Trek Nights in either 1996 or 2001.

The Star Trek Story on channel 5 last Thursday at 8pm sounds much better, it went back to the beginning and had actors playing Roddenberry and herb solow as they pitched the show. Discovery channel showed Trek Nation last night which was ok.
Flake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 01:22 PM   #1673
beamMe
Fleet Captain
 
beamMe's Avatar
 
Location: Europa
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

M wrote: View Post
Ulva wrote: View Post
<snap>

This is just an action film with a Starfleet communicator pin on it.
Very eloquently put post. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said. I'm still surprised this seems to be so popular with fans.
Quite right.
If I wanted to see attractive people do exiting things, quite frankly, I'd rather watch sports.

Damn those onion - brings tears to my eyes every time.
beamMe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 02:54 PM   #1674
sadsquid
Lieutenant
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

LOKAI of CHERON wrote: View Post
M wrote: View Post
Ulva wrote: View Post
<snap>

This is just an action film with a Starfleet communicator pin on it.
Very eloquently put post. I wholeheartedly agree with everything you just said. I'm still surprised this seems to be so popular with fans.
I am literally at the other end of the spectrum here! Even more than the last one, this movie really felt like Star Trek: TOS. As I watched the interaction between the characters - particularly Kirk, Spock, Bones and Scotty, it just felt so "Star Trek" - in a naturalistic, genuine and completely uncontrived fashion. I was so pleased, and was kind of beaming inside!

Add to that, the relentless pace, stunning action sequences, glossy visual sheen, excellent editing, top rate score etc. - and you've got a winner. Loved it, loved it, loved it.
Exactly how I feel. It feels more like Star Trek than ST'09 IMO.

I loved the movie, looking forward to seeing it again. Benedict Cumberbatch was awesome! When there were rumours floating around a while ago that the villain was going to be Khan, I was worried and hoped for a completely new villain, but it turned out much better than I expected. It took TWoK, paid tribute to it, and then put it's own spin on it.

Can't wait for the next movie! And hopefully a new TV Series if TPTB see that there's plenty of life in the franchise! (So hopefully STID does well at the box office...)
sadsquid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 03:16 PM   #1675
Aike
Commander
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Admiral Buzzkill wrote: View Post
Maybe they were simply better distributed.
Nah, Paramount has done poorly all along selling Star Trek outside the US and the English-speaking world.

I think this example illustrates the problem. In the mid-90s, public TV in Sweden wanted to air a sci-fi or Star Trek show because TNG was doing quite well on a small Swedish satellite channel. And there were several Star Trek clubs starting around the country because of the success of TNG.

But the buyer for public TV had no clue about what he to do, so he asked one of the presenters who is a big Star Trek fan. The presenter told him about Voyager. And the buyer decided to buy the show on his recommendation.

One would think that Paramount actually tried to market and sell their own shows. But no.

I guess they still think the same way: "Star Trek just isn´t popular in many markets so just do as little as possible, and if we have to do something let´s sell Star Trek as something else. Like a cop movie Or a Benedict Cumberbatch movie"

But the fun fact is that when Voyager premiered on Swedish TV almost 800 000 people tuned in early June of 1998. That´s a high figure given the broadcast date and the fact that there were about nine million Swedes at the time. In fact, it actually matched the ratings in the US when you adjust for population.
Aike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 03:19 PM   #1676
Oso Blanco
Commodore
 
Oso Blanco's Avatar
 
Location: Berlin, Germany
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

sadsquid wrote: View Post
Benedict Cumberbatch was awesome!
He was, but he didn't have enough time to flesh out the character and to show the audience how dangerous he really is. I think they did this a lot better in The Dark Night. The Joker came across as truly menacing, while nuKhan didn't even begin to show his potential. Wasted opportunity!

I think this movie just screams for an extended cut!
__________________
Time is the fire in which we burn
Oso Blanco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 04:05 PM   #1677
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

ROBE wrote: View Post
Kirk had four silver bars before and after he lost command of the Enterprise and the captain of the USS Bradbury had four silver. So I presume this shows either rank or position of captain.
I would like to see an official rank table so we knew for sure.
I noticed that Noel Clarke's character had a different cap and his badge like the honour guards was plain, so I presume they were ratings/enlisted?
There was a conscious decision on the original series to downplay rank, so I think (someone will doubtless correct me if I'm wrong) that Captain's rank was cut down to 2-1/2 bars (on the sleeve) from four, and commanders were 2. Don't remember if that was abandoned or retained for TMP, though.

I imagine TheAbramsBunch weren't too concerned about this kind of thing though. Probably a little less important than determining ship size accurately.
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 04:08 PM   #1678
trevanian
Rear Admiral
 
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Oso Blanco wrote: View Post
Which brings up another question: When a Captain in rank serves as a first officer, do you address him as Captain? I'm sure that would cause some confusion on the bridge!
Spock was referenced as Captain in TWOK and TUC even after Kirk was in command. (in TWOK it was a code reference of sorts, but even so ... )
trevanian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 04:17 PM   #1679
Phily B
Fleet Captain
 
Phily B's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
View Phily B's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Oso Blanco wrote: View Post
sadsquid wrote: View Post
Benedict Cumberbatch was awesome!
He was, but he didn't have enough time to flesh out the character and to show the audience how dangerous he really is. I think they did this a lot better in The Dark Night. The Joker came across as truly menacing, while nuKhan didn't even begin to show his potential. Wasted opportunity!

I think this movie just screams for an extended cut!
I think they went the other direction where they tried to make him more understandable, I mean you forget about his identity when he is explaining his motives and the fact he is Khan because he seems rather reasonable.
Phily B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12 2013, 04:21 PM   #1680
Therin of Andor
Admiral
 
Therin of Andor's Avatar
 
Location: New Therin Park, Andor (via Australia)
View Therin of Andor's Twitter Profile
Re: STAR TREK INTO DARKNESS - Grading & Discussion [SPOILERS]

Aike wrote: View Post
One would think that Paramount actually tried to market and sell their own shows. But no.
They do.

Here in Australia, TNG was presold to Paramount Picture's Australasian home video sister company, CIC-TAFT, then offered to network TV. In UK, it was bought up by Sky One, a satellite TV station. A similar deal would have been offered in your country. Perhaps no one took up the offer?
__________________
Thiptho lapth! Ian (Entire post is personal opinion)
The Andor Files @ http://andorfiles.blogspot.com/
http://therinofandor.blogspot.com/
Therin of Andor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
benedict cumberbatch, grading & discussion, jj abrams

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.