RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,525
Posts: 5,512,426
Members: 25,138
Currently online: 464
Newest member: Bazzzz85

TrekToday headlines

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Voyager

Voyager There's coffee in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 11 2013, 11:09 AM   #16
Wintertainment
Fleet Captain
 
Wintertainment's Avatar
 
Location: Avon
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

saucer separation is dumb. its silly and leaves you with two awkward bits of ship that look rubbish on their own.

i can see where it might work as an emergency thing on a constitution class, but on newer ships where the primary and secondary hulls are basically one big continuous structure it would look especially aesthetically unappealing
__________________

Hello to Jason Isaacs!
Wintertainment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 11:28 AM   #17
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Janeway might not have asked and B'Elanna must have assumed she knew.

If there was a "usuable" aeroshuttle, they wouldn't have had to invent the Deta Flier.

It could be a really large escape pod who's gears and engines the primary ship needs to operate, in so that it's not to be used until it's time for all hands to abandon the ship anyway.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 12:01 PM   #18
LtChange
Commander
 
Location: Aboard the Destiny
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Viewers never got to see the Aeroshuttle in action due to the limitations of television and story lines. The craft was designed for atmospheric descent and short-term missions. When it was designed, production intended to re-use the Danube-class sets for the Aeroshuttle. Test shots were created depicting the launch of the Aeroshuttle from Voyager. The launch scene was never completed or used on screen because the producers did not want to trump the similar launch sequence of the captain's yacht Cousteau from Star Trek: Insurrection.
http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Voyager_aeroshuttle
LtChange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 12:33 PM   #19
Hartzilla2007
Vice Admiral
 
Hartzilla2007's Avatar
 
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

I would think not seeing as it can eject the warp core and is small enough to probably evacuate the ship using the escape pods.
Hartzilla2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 01:02 PM   #20
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Well the 2nd computer core, could be a back-up core with enough funcationality to get the ship to the nearest starbase.
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 02:18 PM   #21
lennier1
Rear Admiral
 
lennier1's Avatar
 
Location: Germany
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

MacLeod wrote: View Post
Well the 2nd computer core, could be a back-up core with enough funcationality to get the ship to the nearest starbase.
The Intrepid class is a great fit for scientific research on the fringe of Federation space.
In that context it's only logical that she'd have redundant systems where one set could be dedicated to keeping the ship running and on course while the other takes care of a the mission itself.
Think in terms of how the bridge and the CiC aboard a modern warship are both control centers which control ship-wide systems, but take care of completely different aspects.
__________________
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
lennier1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 02:26 PM   #22
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Intrepid's are not a science vessel.

Janeway scoffs about how inferior science vessels are in Equinox when talking about the Nova class.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 02:43 PM   #23
lurok
Commodore
 
lurok's Avatar
 
Location: Lost in the EU expanse with a nice cup of tea
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Does size matter?
__________________
"Anál nathrach, orth’ bháis’s bethad, do chél dénmha"
lurok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 03:09 PM   #24
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
 
Guy Gardener's Avatar
 
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Seems not since Voyager is supposed to be tiny.

Voyager was a tenth the Size of a Kazon City Ship and could face off against ten of them with ease while at peak resources.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is online now   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 03:27 PM   #25
lennier1
Rear Admiral
 
lennier1's Avatar
 
Location: Germany
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

Guy Gardener wrote: View Post
Intrepid's are not a science vessel.

Janeway scoffs about how inferior science vessels are in Equinox when talking about the Nova class.
The Nova is this era's equivalent to the old Oberth class. Lots of sensor equipment, but barely any teeth.
Considering how underpowered a true science vessel is, it's a miracle that Equinox even made it out of Kazon and Vidiian space in one piece.

The Intrepid is more like half a step below the Miranda. Pretty versatile, but it has to make so many trade-offs that it's just an Explorer, instead of a mixed class like the Galaxy. Something you can actually send into an area that was previously only seen on deep-space sensors and still have a good chance that it will survive for more than five minutes.
__________________
Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning.
lennier1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 03:32 PM   #26
F. King Daniel
Admiral
 
F. King Daniel's Avatar
 
Location: King Daniel Into Darkness
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

lurok wrote: View Post
Does size matter?
As a survivor of a million "OMG Abramsprise 725metersTHATStooBiG!!!!!1!!11oneone" threads, I can tell you - it matters to Trekkies
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors! Ep1, Ep2 and Ep3
F. King Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 11 2013, 07:38 PM   #27
Marcus Porcius Cato
Commander
 
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

lennier1 wrote: View Post
MacLeod wrote: View Post
Well the 2nd computer core, could be a back-up core with enough funcationality to get the ship to the nearest starbase.
The Intrepid class is a great fit for scientific research on the fringe of Federation space.
In that context it's only logical that she'd have redundant systems where one set could be dedicated to keeping the ship running and on course while the other takes care of a the mission itself.
Think in terms of how the bridge and the CiC aboard a modern warship are both control centers which control ship-wide systems, but take care of completely different aspects.
Could be parts issue or maintenance issue. They just might not have the parts to keep both cores working.
__________________
"A person without any sense of shame is no longer a human being."

Mencius, Chinese Philosopher (c. 372-289 BCE)
Marcus Porcius Cato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 04:37 AM   #28
Merry Christmas
Vice Admiral
 
Merry Christmas's Avatar
 
Location: tantalizing t'girl's techno temenos
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

R. Star wrote: View Post
I'm inclined to think no, simply because there are no separate impulse engines on the saucer part of Voyager ...
Just like the Enterprise Dee's third torpedo tube is exposed when there is a saucer separation, when Voyager's saucer separates it exposes an additional impulse engine.

Better still would be a deployable third warp nacelle.

Hartzilla2007 wrote: View Post
I would think not seeing as it can eject the warp core ...
While Voyager did manage a single ejection, TNG suggests that the ability to eject a warp core in an emergency isn't a given.

MacLeod wrote: View Post
Well the 2nd computer core, could be a back-up core with enough funcationality to get the ship to the nearest starbase.
The secondary computer core is dedicated to Andorian midget porn.


Last edited by Merry Christmas; April 12 2013 at 10:38 AM.
Merry Christmas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 04:53 AM   #29
teacake
Fleet Admiral
 
teacake's Avatar
 
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

But if it's midgets you don't need that much space.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 12 2013, 08:30 AM   #30
Ho Ho Homeier
Vice Admiral
 
Ho Ho Homeier's Avatar
 
Location: Melakon's place
Re: Can USS VOYAGER separate from saucer section?

teacake wrote: View Post
But if it's midgets you don't need that much space.
This makes as much sense as anything else I've read on page 2.
__________________
Curly: Oh, you hit Santa Claus. Just for that, no toys! --Wee Wee Monsieur (1938)
Ho Ho Homeier is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.