RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,404
Posts: 5,359,213
Members: 24,626
Currently online: 555
Newest member: space2050


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 27 2013, 06:17 PM   #1
James T. Vader
Lieutenant
 
"I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

So what's everyone's opinon of miltary gunho conservative war fighting savage Kirk in Errand of Mercy? Man seems determined to fight a war no matter what the cost.

What was Gene thinking?
James T. Vader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2013, 07:21 PM   #2
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

James T. Vader wrote: View Post
So what's everyone's opinon of miltary gunho conservative war fighting savage Kirk in Errand of Mercy? Man seems determined to fight a war no matter what the cost.

What was Gene thinking?
Kirk was sent on a mission and was going to complete that mission if at all possible. Kirk is chastised by the Organians and seems repentant to a degree at the end of the episode.

If a character is perfect from the get-go then there's nothing for them to learn during the course of the story and it can get dull pretty quick. I call it "Jean-Luc Picard Syndrome".
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2013, 07:57 PM   #3
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

That Kirk was a flawed, passionate being, charged with defending the Federation, not an enlightened paragon of evolved humanity who never wrestled with issues of conscience, duty, command, etcetera?

Works for me.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2013, 07:58 PM   #4
sonak
Vice Admiral
 
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

James T. Vader wrote: View Post
So what's everyone's opinon of miltary gunho conservative war fighting savage Kirk in Errand of Mercy? Man seems determined to fight a war no matter what the cost.

What was Gene thinking?

er, the Klingons were an expansive and oppressive imperial power who were enslaving planets full of neutrals. Kirk's attitude makes perfect sense here, including his initial frustration and then contempt for the pacifism of the Organians.
__________________
"why oh why didn't I take the blue pill?"
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 27 2013, 11:52 PM   #5
mach7
Commander
 
mach7's Avatar
 
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

Kirk was doing what every competent military commander would do in such a situation.

The Klingons were at war with the Federation. Kirk had a duty to impede their war fighting ability.

It's basic military training.

And what would be the cost of not acting? Unchallenged klingon control of Organia?
That would be out of character for both Kirk and Spock. They would, and did, fight the war until they were pulled out, dead, or it was no longer necessary.
mach7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:15 AM   #6
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

TOS was inconsistent on many levels, more than most of the new shows in fact. I prefer to think of Kirk the one-dimensional military man to be a product of the same effort to establish the show as UESPA and the like. If Kirk was always written like this he'd be a distasteful character. Compare to Picard...prepared to fight a war in Redemption, but very reluctant to do so.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:33 AM   #7
Nerys Myk
Fleet Admiral
 
Nerys Myk's Avatar
 
Location: House of Kang, now with ridges
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

RAMA wrote: View Post
TOS was inconsistent on many levels, more than most of the new shows in fact. I prefer to think of Kirk the one-dimensional military man to be a product of the same effort to establish the show as UESPA and the like. If Kirk was always written like this he'd be a distasteful character. Compare to Picard...prepared to fight a war in Redemption, but very reluctant to do so.

RAMA
I don't think "one-dimensional military man" was ever intended to be Kirk's characterization, so it isn't the same thing as abandoned concepts like UESPA.
__________________
The boring one, the one with Khan, the one where Spock returns, the one with whales, the dumb one, the last one, the one with Kirk, the one with the Borg, the stupid one, the bad one, the new one, the other one with Khan.
Nerys Myk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 05:28 AM   #8
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

Kirk was a complicated guy, trying to do his duty out on the final frontier. And sometimes that duty brought him into conflict with the Klingons.

Didn't mean he eagerly sought out conflict.

In fact, I believe "Errand" starts out with Kirk saying something like "Well, we didn't want war, but here it is . . . ."

That doesn't strike me as particularly gung-ho or militaristic.
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 06:06 AM   #9
Anwar
Vice Admiral
 
Anwar's Avatar
 
Location: Regina, SK, Canada
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

The irony (and point) of the episode was that Kirk said that he didn't want to fight a war at the start, but during the course of the episode he becomes so determined to fight against the Klingons he is disgusted with himself when the Organians make him realize he actually ended up arguing in favor of a war that would've killed billions.

Then at the end, he himself managed to joke about the irony of how he was angry over being kept from fighting a war he didn't want in the first place.
Anwar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 02:40 PM   #10
Marsden
Commander
 
Marsden's Avatar
 
Location: Getting killed so the captain can have tea later.
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

It amazes me how all the posters saw the same episode and took so many different opinions away from it.

Time for mine.

Kirk was not so much angry at them preventing the war as they were interfering with his ability to accomplish his mission. He didn't want the war, but his mission was to win it. It could not be prevented, as when an enemy sends a fleet of warships into your space and attacks your ships and colonies, it's war. Unless you roll over and surrender and learn to speak Klingonese.

There's only one thing worse than a war, losing a war, and the Klingons aren't the type to do that whole "we'll help you rebuild" thing after they've won.

James T. Vader wrote: View Post
So what's everyone's opinon of miltary gunho conservative war fighting savage Kirk in Errand of Mercy? Man seems determined to fight a war no matter what the cost.

What was Gene thinking?
What are you trying to say? Kirk was not gungho at all, as others have pointed out.

How can you tell if he's conservative, politics are not mentioned, unless democracy is "conservative" compared to the Klingon dictatorship.

Put phasers on stun is savage? They killed no one. (on an aside, ever wonder when they stun someone and then they fall down a flight of stone steps? Oh, he'll be alright, he's just stunned. Reminds me of what happend to Ricardo Montalbaun in the end of The Naked Gun)

And again, he's determined to win, not fight. If he could win by talking, he would, but two sentences into his speech the Klingons would shoot him. This is one of Kirk's most defining characteristics, the need to triumph, it's very in character and they are not "inconsistent" with that.

Gene Roddenberry or Gene Coon?
__________________
"A man either lives life as it happens to him, meets it head-on, and licks it. Or he turns his back on it and starts to wither away."

Last edited by Marsden; March 28 2013 at 03:05 PM.
Marsden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:09 PM   #11
RAMA
Vice Admiral
 
RAMA's Avatar
 
Location: NJ, USA
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
TOS was inconsistent on many levels, more than most of the new shows in fact. I prefer to think of Kirk the one-dimensional military man to be a product of the same effort to establish the show as UESPA and the like. If Kirk was always written like this he'd be a distasteful character. Compare to Picard...prepared to fight a war in Redemption, but very reluctant to do so.

RAMA
I don't think "one-dimensional military man" was ever intended to be Kirk's characterization, so it isn't the same thing as abandoned concepts like UESPA.
But his character was inconsistent because they were still establishing that world.

I'd also note Kirk never made an attempt a diplomacy before the war started. He DOES in most episodes. He simply seemed far to eager to jump into the fray.

RAMA
__________________
It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Carl Sagan
RAMA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:23 PM   #12
Marsden
Commander
 
Marsden's Avatar
 
Location: Getting killed so the captain can have tea later.
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

RAMA wrote: View Post
I'd also note Kirk never made an attempt a diplomacy before the war started. He DOES in most episodes. He simply seemed far to eager to jump into the fray.

RAMA
Would that be during the Klingon ship hitting the Enterprise with magnetic pulses or when the later 8 vessels invade Orgainia? When is this "before" you speak of?
__________________
"A man either lives life as it happens to him, meets it head-on, and licks it. Or he turns his back on it and starts to wither away."
Marsden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:35 PM   #13
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

Thankfully, the episode steered clear of Kirk single-handedly deciding the course of a war with a rival culture. He was, after all, not a diplomat but a soldier. It would be a sorry Federation indeed where one person would be burdened with all the tasks currently split across tens of thousands of professionals of various fields!

Also, I definitely think "We have the right to wage war!" is part of the hard, solid core of the person called James T. Kirk. We never got a reason to think differently. If Kirk negotiates, it is not for avoiding conflict - it is for gaining the upper hand. Kirk decides who his enemies are, and then defeats those; there is no attempt at making friends out of enemies in any of the episodes or movies.

That doesn't mean Kirk wouldn't be a compassionate, moderate and lenient man by our standards. When he gets angry at a species, he goes to war against Klingons - with phasers on stun. When he gets really mad at a person, he blasts Khan's starship to bits - and then offers to beam him to safety. When his very son is murdered, he mows down all the murderer's henchmen - and then offers a helping hand to the chief villain. But that's merely the new definition of a hardass conservative for the 23rd century.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 03:59 PM   #14
diankra
Commodore
 
Location: UK
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

I'd compare it to the way the NASA astronauts behaved across Apollo: they were dedicated to achieving the mission, and the more successful ones were the ones who realised the mission had changed once the initial goal had been achieved.
The 'old heads' tended to see the mission as being test pilotry: flying a new flying machine in a new environment, with science an unnecessary distraction which could get in the way of achieving that. In the very early days, when everything was an unknown and a potential danger, that could be the right approach (like for Wally Schirra in MA8), but later on 'getting there' was no longer the point (as, to an extent, Al Shepherd failed to realise on Apollo 14), it was what you did there that mattered and justified flying more missions, as newer recruits like Dave Scott realised (even though they were sometimes more straight-backed militaristic than their predecessors).
In Errand of Mercy, Kirk's accepted that the mission has changed: in the current circumstances, he is a soldier, and his feelings about it don't matter; his mission is now to thwart the Klingon intrusion on Organia by any means.
__________________
"Some days are better than others. They say that where I come from."
"Loudly, I imagine, on the day you left."
(Blake's 7 - Rumours of Death)
diankra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 28 2013, 04:15 PM   #15
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: "I'm a soldier not a diplomat."

RAMA wrote: View Post
Nerys Myk wrote: View Post
RAMA wrote: View Post
TOS was inconsistent on many levels, more than most of the new shows in fact. I prefer to think of Kirk the one-dimensional military man to be a product of the same effort to establish the show as UESPA and the like. If Kirk was always written like this he'd be a distasteful character. Compare to Picard...prepared to fight a war in Redemption, but very reluctant to do so.

RAMA
I don't think "one-dimensional military man" was ever intended to be Kirk's characterization, so it isn't the same thing as abandoned concepts like UESPA.
But his character was inconsistent because they were still establishing that world.

I'd also note Kirk never made an attempt a diplomacy before the war started. He DOES in most episodes. He simply seemed far to eager to jump into the fray.

RAMA

Well, in the case of "Errand of Mercy," that isn't Kirk's call. This wasn't a first-contact scenario where Kirk is in the position of representing the Federation to a brand-new alien species. The Organia incident is just one front on a larger conflict between the UFP and the Klingons that has been apparently been building for some time.

As the ep begins, Kirk receives word that negotiations have broken down and a state of war now exists. Presumably the diplomats have been working overtime to avert this situation, but to no avail. The decision to go to war has been made at level far above Kirk's pay scale--and not just concerning Organia.

Was he supposed to try to negotiate a separate peace with the Klingons on Organia after the Federation's top leaders and diplomats failed? That would be like an individual submarine commander deciding to take it upon himself to negotiate a peace treaty with the Japanese during World War II or whatever . . . .
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.