RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,736
Posts: 5,215,255
Members: 24,211
Currently online: 997
Newest member: DeimosAnimus


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science and Technology

Science and Technology "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." - Carl Sagan.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 28 2013, 11:20 PM   #1
Into Darkness
Commander
 
Into Darkness's Avatar
 
Location: In the Doctors Tardis about to enter a Stargate
Tungsten Rods / Orbital Weapon

I'm an avid cinema goer and I recently watched GI Joe: Retaliation and in that film they had a weapon in orbit which basically dropped large tungsten rods towards the Earth, these rods only had gravity behind them and weren't rocket propelled in any way. One of these rods dropped and hit London and wiped it out.
How realistic would such a weapon be?

What speed would the rod reach in Earth gravity? and would a rod be capable of such devastation?
Into Darkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 29 2013, 09:07 AM   #2
Asbo Zaprudder
Rear Admiral
 
Asbo Zaprudder's Avatar
 
Location: Magic realism
Re: Tungsten Rods / Orbital Weapon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinetic_bombardment

Jerry Pournelle thought up the concept, but he'd most certainly read the "Doc".

The ones mooted for use by the USAF were 11.5 ton TNT equivalent, but would have a mass of 8 tons. Impact speed was Mach 10. A conventional bomb could do as much damage for less cost as the article points out.

A city rather than bunker buster would have to mass many tens of thousands if not millions of tons -- as the Chelyabinsk meteor demonstrated. It would take project Orion to heft that much stuff around so why no just use the nukes themselves.
__________________
"Sans le canard de Vaucanson vous n'auriez rien qui fit ressouvenir de la gloire de la France." -- Voltaire -- Flip flap!
Asbo Zaprudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.