Earth ship Valiant

[Wingsley]

In "Where No Man Has Gone Before", the Starship Enterprise encounters a battered recorder-marker from the Valiant.

The Valiant was obviously a manned starship, presumably with a crew of some size. We know that seven crew members were killed by the Valiant's encounter with the negative-energy barrier at the Galaxy's edge. Then one crewmember somehow was revived, pulling a Gary Mitchell. We know the captain was worried, and eventually either ordered or contemplated ordering the ship to self-destruct.

We can assume, therefore, that the Valiant was large enough to house at least a crew of eight, and possibly significantly more. If ENT is any guide, the upper end of the Valiant's crew size was less than that of the NX-01 Enterprise. Archer's ship was supposedly state-of-the-art of its time and no ship design had been so ambitious up to that point. (a century later after Valiant) So I'm assuming Valiant could not have a crew the size of Archer's Enterprise (83).

I seem to remember some images from the Star Trek Encyclopedia in the 1990s.

Does anyone have access to that Encyclopedia? I'd like to see images of what the Valiant might have looked like.

Has anyone else imagined the Valiant?

[CorporalCaptain]

There's actually a lot of info on the Valiant at http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/SS_Valiant. According to it:

Although the Valiant's call letters aren't established in "Where No Man Has Gone Before", they are said to be "VAL 115" in the episode's script. [...]

The Valiant was again referred to as a galactic survey cruiser in Star Trek Maps (1980), which also gives the vessel the registry NCC-S1104. [...]

A model of the Valiant was built by Greg Jein for the first edition of the Star Trek Chronology (1993). On its hull the ship was named Valiant with no USS or SS. The model was also marked with the registry number ADC-11031 and the number 02 on the bridge module. [1] According to Doug Drexler, this model influenced the design of the SS Conestoga, a ship also launched in the 2060s, for the Star Trek: Enterprise episode "Terra Nova". [2]

[C.E. Evans]

I always imagined that the Valiant looked something like the U.S.S. Palomino from Disney's The Black Hole:
http://www.zumstein.org/pics/system/...-Palomino2.jpg

But perhaps larger.

[Timo]

If ENT is any guide, the upper end of the Valiant's crew size was less than that of the NX-01 Enterprise.

Historically, the crew size of ships and combat vehicles or aircraft has gone down with advances in technology...

No such trend in spacecraft yet, but then again, starships have precious little to do with today's spacecraft.

I'd like to see images of what the Valiant might have looked like.

Courtesy of Drex Files:

http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/...ant-pictorial/

That's before the warp nacelles were added - but one might well speculate that this is what happened in the real world as well, and the surprisingly early launch date of the Valiant is the result of the makers taking an already existing sublight spacecraft and just bolting on the newly invented FTL drive.

Timo Saloniemi

[blssdwlf]

I kinda like that model. I don't necessarily agree with the implied size (it looks kinda small) and the rocket engines on the back don't exactly speak "impulse".

[Timo]

Then again, perhaps the ship had rockets, warp and impulse?

The nature of impulse engines supposedly did not change between Scotty's "Relics" crash and his recovery from it, but there might have been some change involved before that. These round things look quite a bit like the "star destroyer" engines of that ship in the ENT opening credits...

Warp would make small ships practical: endurance requirements would go way down when your interstellar journey only takes a few years rather than centuries, or a few days rather than years, whatever your application.

I wonder if this design didn't become something of a "Skylab" when converted from sublight to warp. That is, the apparent huge fuel or propellant tanks might have been left rather empty when a warp reactor of some sort became the primary consumer of said, and the ship virtually stopped using her sublight engines. Perhaps the tank interiors were converted into payload space?

Timo Saloniemi

[blssdwlf]

Converting into payload space seems very likely. It would echo the TOS Enterprise to TMP Enterprise upgrade and the large cargo area of the new ship.

[bryce]

blssdwlf wrote:

---

I kinda like that model. I don't necessarily agree with the implied size (it looks kinda small) and the rocket engines on the back don't exactly speak "impulse".

They do look similar to these though. So..could this be an early impulse design...?

[blssdwlf]

It could be. I guess I'm use to seeing the old impulse in TOS where both the Enterprise and the Romulan BOP lacked any glowy bits to show thrust.

[Wingsley]

Timo wrote:

---

Historically, the crew size of ships and combat vehicles or aircraft has gone down with advances in technology...

No such trend in spacecraft yet, but then again, starships have precious little to do with today's spacecraft.
i

The way I look at it, Earth started with crude multi-stage rockets like launch vehicles used in the 1960's. (The Saturn V as an example; observe the small command module and LEM) Then that flagship was replaced with the Space Shuttle.

"Space Seed" suggested an evolution: the larger (but still tiny next to Kirk's Enterprise) DY-100.

Whatever the Valiant was could be a missing link between the advanced DY's and later ships like the Ringship and the NX, both of which are smaller than the Connie.

I'm assuming that the hull designs gradually grew in size as each succeeding generation developed superior abilities for life support, artificial gravity, reliability, etc., to support larger crews. This would also be assumed retroactively from Spock's comments on "crude" space vessels in "Balance of Terror", suggesting that historically older ships have lesser abilities and lesser crews.

Courtesy of Drex Files:

http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2009/...ant-pictorial/

That's before the warp nacelles were added - but one might well speculate that this is what happened in the real world as well, and the surprisingly early launch date of the Valiant is the result of the makers taking an already existing sublight spacecraft and just bolting on the newly invented FTL drive.

Timo Saloniemi

This design reminds me of the San Francisco from the Starfleet Museum. Thanks for sharing.

[Timo]

"Space Seed" suggested an evolution: the larger (but still tiny next to Kirk's Enterprise) DY-100.

...With a crew (passenger) complement of 84 already.

Whether cryosleep would increase or decrease packing density is arguable. Shorter hops inside Sol system might still be long enough to require massive onboard supplies that would eat into the passenger spaces (until the passengers ate into them) - but OTOH going without cryochambers might mean going without lots of bulky equipment.

And whether the Valiant had cryosleep or not, we just don't know. It went out of fashion in insystem travel in 2018, but there are plenty of references to this or like procedures in interstellar warp travel at least until the 2210s ("11:59" IIRC), with occasional use by our 24th century heroes as well.

Timo Saloniemi

[aridas sofia]

Wingsley wrote:

---

Has anyone else imagined the Valiant?

I did this, which Tallguy graciously modeled some years ago:

http://www.trekbbs.com/showthread.php?t=63543

It was meant to reflect the 1970-80s era that I originally worked in, where the only points of reference for the early days of Trek space travel were the DY-100, Nomad, and the Jefferies ringship.

[T'Girl]

Wingsley wrote:

---

The way I look at it, Earth started with crude multi-stage rockets like launch vehicles used in the 1960's. Then that flagship was replaced with the Space Shuttle.

And then the Space Shuttle was superseded by a Russian multi-stage rocket, originally designed in the 1960's.

Has anyone else imagined the Valiant?

The Valiant would appear to have left Earth fairly soon after Cochrane's first flight. I imagine it voyaging outward on a lifelong science and discovery mission. Occasionally trading for more advanced engines and other systems.

By the time it reached the energy barrier decades after it left Earth, it was an eclectic collection of lumpy hull designs and oddly placed engine configurations.

[Timo]

And then the Space Shuttle was superseded by a Russian multi-stage rocket, originally designed in the 1960's.

Not in Star Trek, apparently. Or at least we see a structure much like the original Freedom concept being serviced by a reusable, lifting body spacecraft in the ENT opening credits.

Perhaps multistage rockets and ballistic capsules made a comeback in the Trek universe as well. Perhaps not. Zephram Cochrane was able to gain access to a single-stage-to-high-orbit (or even Earth escape velocity, by the looks of it) rocket for his warp experiment, which might suggest that such technologies were quite obsolete already. Or then this might suggest that rather than obsolete, they were merely commonplace.

The Valiant would appear to have left Earth fairly soon after Cochrane's first flight.

Kirk calls it out in the episode: the ship has been missing for "over two centuries". Clearly, he knows exactly what he's talking about, or he'd not feel entitled to say anything like this on the subject. So if "Where No Man" takes place in 2266 (the very earliest to match the speculative idea that this was the start of the five-year mission with the hard fact that said mission ended in 2270), the ship must indeed have been launched almost immediately after Cochrane proved his warp invention.

I imagine it voyaging outward on a lifelong science and discovery mission.

...But note that the ship "disappeared" almost immediately after launch. This would seem to suggest that Earth had a way to keep in contact with the ship until the disappearance. And later Spock says the recorder marker was "apparently" launched "200 years ago", so the mission must also have ended up at the edge of the galaxy almost immediately - either right after the "disappearance", or then at least within a few decades of it, or else we'd have to assume Spock speculated incorrectly.

These set some limits on what happened, and perhaps on the nature of the Valiant as well. Spock must have based his speculation on the marker ejection date on something he found plausible. Either there was directly physical evidence there that the launch had indeed happened at the specified date, or then Spock (unlike Kirk) found nothing wrong with the idea that the ship would have reached this spot in just a few years and based his speculation on that. IMHO, the former is the likelier approach.

Timo Saloniemi

[t_smitts]

I have to admit, it's a bit hard to reconcile the Valiant with the NX-01, which in "Broken Bow", was strongly indicated to be Earth's first deep space exploration vessel.

Then again, it's also hard to reconcile how this ship, which was almost certainly cruising along at something less than warp 2 could've reached the galaxy's edge.

Come to think of it, it's been a while since I saw "Where No Man...": Did they explicitly say the Valiant was an Earth ship? I'm sure they probably did, but it would at least give some leeway if they hadn't.