|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Commander
Location: Red Tardis
|
The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
I'm sure the writers would simply have the DM gobble them up like M&M's but it was interesting that they weren't even mentioned. For that matter, why not aim the phasers "down its throat?" Was it because the torpedoes weren't introduced until a later episode? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In pre-production
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
There's no good answer in-universe for why they didn't use them at all. In the end, it's not important to the story, anyway; they wouldn't have worked.
__________________
John |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
Of course, back then, we didn't know that photon torpedoes relied on antimatter, but nowadays it's pretty much a given. Or at least we can rest assured that most photon torpedoes have antimatter warheads, even if the name just possibly might refer to something else than the warhead type.
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Commander
Location: Red Tardis
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Sarpeidon's past
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Georgia, USA
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
I know; I know, "not canon!" But it's the closest thing we have to an answer. Maybe such a sequence was intended but for one reason or another (script running over time, not enough money or time to do the added effects) the idea was "cut". Sincerely, Bill
__________________
Tempt the Hand of Fate and it'll give you the "finger"! Freighter Tails: the Misadventures of Mzzkiti |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Captain
Location: USS Berlin
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
![]() If that thing was capable to "deactivate" the onboard antimatter of the Constellation, we could assume it did the same with the Enterprise which then relied entirely on energizer power (or fusion power, IMHO). Alternately, photon torpedos essentially provide a devastating and diffuse blast while the phasers have properties of a cutting beam (same story with "The Paradise Syndriome", no use of photon torpedos either). I was under the impression they tried to cut through the hull of the planet killer. But even then, of course, firing some photon torpedos into the throat of the planet killer would have surely provided a yield of over a 100 megatons, so I do believe their antimatter had been rendered inert. While the tactical approach doesn't seem to make a lot of sense in-universe, I believe we are looking at another fine example of an attempt to implement the "Hornblower Effect" into a Star Trek story. Eventually, the Constellation's dead hull is used as a fire ship to destroy an enemy's vessel. Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth, whether it's scientific truth or historical truth or personal truth! It is the guiding principle on which Starfleet is based! Jean-Luc Picard Last edited by Robert Comsol; February 18 2013 at 11:37 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
Was the DDM a weapon? It did not seem to pursue tactical goals, such as eliminating threats. It just demolished and ate, and growled at those who attempted to intervene. If the DDM was merely a reverse terraforming tool of sorts, it would not systematically and strategically act against potential threats, and would have no particular reason to scan for devious hidden bombs. The TOS practices on photon torpedo use warrant some examination, too. In "Arena", torpedoes were used against a target at extreme range, while the landing party fought at long ranges using a possibly similar weapon that apparently posed a great risk to the user in closer combat. In "The Changeling", a single torpedo was a seeking precision weapon used against a nearby but extremely small target. In "Elaan of Troyius", a spread of torpedoes was effective at medium range in a warp fight (or possibly a warp-impulse-warp strafing fight), while in "Journey to Babel", it was ineffective at close range. This spectrum of uses or attempted uses would seem to rule out most of the tactical limitations we might imagine applying to the "DDM" situation. The maw of the DDM would not be too close ("Journey to Babel"), too small and difficult to hit ("The Changeling"), or too distant ("Arena"). Then again, if torpedoes are the preferred weapon in long range or high speed fights, "Arena" and TNG era style, it would make sense for Decker to have tried them out in his reputed initial long range engagement. If they proved useless there, Decker would not try and use them when commanding the Enterprise, either. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Commander
Location: Red Tardis
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
Commodore
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
DECKER: I made a mistake then. We were too far away. This time I'm going to hit it with full phasers at point-blank range.
SULU: Closing fast. Last edited by blssdwlf; February 18 2013 at 03:31 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: wallowing in a pool of emotion
|
Re: The Doomsday Machine - why no photon torpodoes?
Perhaps, during his initial attack on the machine, the Constellation's torpedoes were completely ineffective, but maybe one of the phaser hits got lucky and did some kind of extremely minor damage to the machine - something like knocking off some minor piece of unrelated debris off the neutronium hull or something. So Decker may have had an unrealistic hope that phasers might have more of a chance than a torpedo, which is why he didn't launch any from Enterprise. But, I do think everything Decker did against the machine from Enterprise has to also be looked at in light of the fact that he really wasn't mentally fit for command and shouldn't have been in the center seat anyway, and therefore all of his decisions, including not using the photons and not trying for a "down-the-throat" shot (not to mention flying into the machine in a shuttle), were all suspect. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















