RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,108
Posts: 5,432,722
Members: 24,932
Currently online: 623
Newest member: Cani

TrekToday headlines

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Yelchin In New Indie Thriller
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Saldana In The Book of Life
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

Cracked’s New Sci-Fi Satire
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16

Beltran Introduces Shakespeare To Theater Group
By: T'Bonz on Oct 16


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 18 2013, 07:36 PM   #31
DalekJim
Fleet Captain
 
DalekJim's Avatar
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

They're not amazing or anything but Hamill, Fisher and Ford were very good in the original trilogy. Fisher tends to get overlooked but I thought she gave the best performance of the core three.


As a hardcore EU devotee though, I wouldn't mind if Ep VII had nothing to do with the Skywalker family. Star Wars is so much bigger than that.
DalekJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18 2013, 07:40 PM   #32
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

DalekJim wrote: View Post
They're not amazing or anything but Hamill, Fisher and Ford were very good in the original trilogy. Fisher tends to get overlooked but I thought she gave the best performance of the core three.
They were adequate for the material but I imagine there were hundreds of starving actors in Hollywood who would've given equally adequate performances.

I thought Fisher was much more convincing in The Blues Brothers.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18 2013, 07:43 PM   #33
Creepy Critter
Admiral
 
Creepy Critter's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

sojourner wrote: View Post
I like them better than movies where the lead is obviously too old for the part. (Que 1980's Roger Moore as 007)
Plus, you can't cast the actor who first played a part if he's dead. Or if they refuse to play the part anymore, e.g. Lazenby.

A beaker full of death wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post

How I hate passing the torch movies.
I too. As De Kelley said, "if it ain't broke, don't fix it."
If only Kelley could have played McCoy in 2009, but—he's dead, Jim.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Creepy Critter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18 2013, 07:48 PM   #34
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

CorporalCaptain wrote: View Post

If only Kelley could have played McCoy in 2009, but—he's dead, Jim.
Urban did a hell of a job channeling Kelley though.
__________________
"If I hadn't tried, the cost would have been my soul." - Admiral James T. Kirk, Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
BillJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 18 2013, 11:30 PM   #35
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

Relayer1 wrote: View Post
JarodRussell wrote: View Post
How I hate passing the torch movies.
The alternative is often 'No more movies'.
Who the hell published that lie?

There's no need for anyone of the original actors to pass the torch to younger ones. Just have the younger ones. Or just have the older ones. Or have both young and old in substantial roles, and simply fuck the torch.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19 2013, 01:01 AM   #36
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

^completely agree.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19 2013, 01:04 AM   #37
arch101
Fleet Captain
 
arch101's Avatar
 
Location: 10 miles west of the Universal Hub
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

I'm not sure how happy I am that they'll have to devote time to Ford's Solo in the sequel (you don't hire him for a cameo). I'm of the mind that they should only bring back Hamil as "Old Luke" to play the Obi-Wan or Qui-Gon type character and pass the torch before heroically giving his life in the climax of the first film. They're supposed to be setting up a new trilogy of films with new characters to carry them. Spending valuable screen time on characters who had their day is wasteful.
__________________
BOSTON is STRONG with The Force
arch101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19 2013, 01:08 AM   #38
Creepy Critter
Admiral
 
Creepy Critter's Avatar
 
Location: Kentucky
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

At this point, it's presumptive to assume that Episode VII will pass the torch, or that Han's role will be shoehorned in, or anything. Right now, for all we know, Han could legitimately figure into events as one of the major players in the Alliance/New Republic.
__________________
CorporalCaptain
Creepy Critter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19 2013, 04:13 AM   #39
theenglish
Rear Admiral
 
theenglish's Avatar
 
Location: Suriname
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

BillJ wrote: View Post
DalekJim wrote: View Post

I really hate the idea that only young people can star in movies.
I don't think that's the case at all. But I do understand studios 'playing the percentages' by casting younger actors as the central characters when building a movie series that could conceivably run ten to fifteen years.

We're all fragile, but the younger you are the less likely you are to 'expire' or run into an affliction that could complicate the process.
This is not about rehashing the old movies, this is about living in the past or writing a new story. Each trilogy of the series should be about a separate generation of the Skywalker family.

What I don't want to see is some fanboy crap movie that tries to rekindle the past by regurgitating things that have already been done. Rather I want to see a continuation of the story with new characters and themes that tie nicely with those that have come before without treading over trampled ground.

(How's that for mixed metaphors?)
theenglish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 19 2013, 11:14 PM   #40
EnsignRicky
Commodore
 
EnsignRicky's Avatar
 
Location: Pre-Apocalyptic Earth
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

Luke already passed the torch on at the end of Jedi; To his father.
__________________
Use Only As Directed
EnsignRicky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20 2013, 09:34 PM   #41
The Fiend
Torturing Savage Dragon
 
The Fiend's Avatar
 
Location: Hell
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

__________________
Savage Dragon. Accept no substitutes.
The Fiend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20 2013, 09:44 PM   #42
EnsignRicky
Commodore
 
EnsignRicky's Avatar
 
Location: Pre-Apocalyptic Earth
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

Cute
__________________
Use Only As Directed
EnsignRicky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20 2013, 10:42 PM   #43
Silvercrest
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

Maybe Han could be the villain. Being "General Solo" in the Rebellion obviously appealed to him, so in his later years perhaps he tries to take over the Republic in a military coup. After declaring himself Emperor and renaming himself "Napoleon Solo", he--

Oh.

Never mind.
Silvercrest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old February 20 2013, 11:36 PM   #44
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

I know the obvious move for the sequels is to show Han being a General and settling down with Leia, etc etc... but I think I'd much rather see him striking off on his own and becoming a bit of a renegade again. And maybe even having some of that grumpiness and edge that Ford himself now has.

He might have been willing to play along to take down the Empire, but I just can't imagine him wanting to be the noble, upstanding leader forever.
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 20 2013, 11:41 PM   #45
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Han Solo...(Possible Spoilers)

President Ford!
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
han solo, star wars

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:37 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.