Emergency ....Medical? Hologram???

[Photonic]

I love trek because of the stories and examples it can give us about being more moral human beings...if you can get past the ridiculous plot problems to watch it long enough.



So you are sitting on a Starfleet committee and you are a high ranking officer, at least captain. You have tons of experience under your belt either commanding ships, or leading men and women in various facets.

Assembled for this committee you sit and listen to doctor lewis zimmerman give you his sales pitch about an autonomous hologram capable of instantly appearing and doing complex functions like ...treating aortic ruptures and brain hemmorages and designing borg nano probes to kill species 8472 (*cough*)




This is all well and good ..and now to the point. You wonder why we don't have Emergency Security holograms instead. The ability to project 100 EMH's with limited tactical training (who btw cant be harmed unless you target the EMITTERS) would have ended dozens of episodes in mere seconds.


Why not emergency engineer holograms? Hell we already know about how the EMH mark 1's were scrubbing plasma conduits.

[JirinPanthosa]

I think EMH's only came first because of the humanitarian element. If they could fit their entire ship with holo-projectors, or even reproduce the mobile emitter (A little strange the 29th century folks let them keep that), you wonder if you could run an entire starship where everyone and everything is holographically projected.

[Bry_Sinclair]

If follows in the same line of questioning, why doesn't Starfleet just send out probes or automated ships? Why send out crews?

Holograms are tools. They are only as ggod as their programming and will never replace a flesh and blood individual.

[CoveTom]

See "The Ultimate Computer" for why holograms don't run starships or even do security.

[Mr. Laser Beam]

^ Although it can be argued that the reason the M-5 was so unstable in that episode was because Dr. Daystrom programmed it with his own memories and personality. Daystrom was a bit nuts himself, so naturally the M-5 also was.

[Christopher]

Photonic wrote:

---

This is all well and good ..and now to the point. You wonder why we don't have Emergency Security holograms instead. The ability to project 100 EMH's with limited tactical training (who btw cant be harmed unless you target the EMITTERS) would have ended dozens of episodes in mere seconds.

First of all, the technology wasn't that advanced to start with. You needed a controlled environment for the EMH to exist in. As we saw, Voyager's crew looked into the possibility of installing more holodiodes to grant the Doctor more mobility around the ship, but nothing ever came of it; apparently it didn't turn out to be viable. The Hirogen were able to expand the holodecks considerably, but at the expense of a lot of other vital ship's systems. The more holographic capacity you build into the ship, the more power and processing it demands.

For another thing, when dealing with an untested AI, it makes sense to employ something akin to Asimov's Laws. You'd want to program them with safeguards that would ensure they wouldn't harm living beings.

Of course, that's when it was starting out. Realistically, you'd expect them to use ESHs or some sort of robotic drones by the time of Nemesis, say. But then, realistically you'd expect them to have kept the helmets and body armor that security guards wore in the TOS movies, or to have seatbelts on their ships and airlocks in their shuttles. The fundamental disconnect between fiction and reality is that real-world designers are concerned with minimizing the odds of anything dangerous happening, while storytellers are concerned with maximizing them.

[JoeZhang]

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

---

If follows in the same line of questioning, why doesn't Starfleet just send out probes or automated ships? Why send out crews?

Holograms are tools. They are only as ggod as their programming and will never replace a flesh and blood individual.

Except the whole point of the EMH on voyager was that he did replace a flesh and blood being and was treated the same as one by the crew.

[Christopher]

JoeZhang wrote:

---

Except the whole point of the EMH on voyager was that he did replace a flesh and blood being and was treated the same as one by the crew.

But that wasn't the point of the EMH as intended by its in-universe designers. They saw it only as an emergency supplement that would assist the ship's medical staff in situations where there were a lot of injuries to treat. It was never expected or intended that any EMH would remain in service long enough to develop any real self-awareness or personality. What happened with Voyager's EMH was a special case, something that quite overtly went against the intentions of the program's creators. As we saw in "The Swarm," the program wasn't meant to stay in continual use for that long or to expand its parameters like the Doctor did, and almost suffered catastrophic failure as a result.

And what we're talking about here are the intentions of the designers and the Starfleet planners. What Bry_Sinclair presumably means is that Starfleet didn't perceive holograms to be anything more than tools and thus wouldn't have seen them as replacements for living personnel.

[Gary7]

True, that the programming for medical skills far exceeds that required for employing a weapon. So yes, in theory one could have holo-emitters all throughout the ship, with weapons lockers in reach so that the ESH (Emergency Security Hologram) squad could arm themselves after appearing. But then that would foil a lot of the stories in Star Trek.

A "plausible" way to explain why this was never done is to say that the holo emitters are energy intensive and thus not practical in use for security purposes. Of course, if the doctor's mobile emitter is figured out and replicated, then... well, this presents a HUGE set of problems because you can create an entire population of virtual beings within a very short period of time, that could easily outnumber the entire sentient population of the galaxy. Since the EMH doctor did evolve over time and become what one would consider "sentient", it's possible for undesirable human like traits to emerge like narcissism or megalomania. Virtual tyrants. Yeah... that's just what we need.

[Christopher]

^Yeah, this is why I'm not fond of suggestions to do Trek series set in the 25th or 26th century or something. The technology that's already on the table as of the late 24th century would logically have the potential to transform the Federation profoundly. Why not just have everyone upload their minds into mobile holoemitters and become effectively immortal? Then they wouldn't need starships either, since they could just transmit themselves from world to world. But I doubt we'd ever see a Trek series like that. The creators would probably stick with live human characters and starships and stuff that would just be hard to justify given all the revolutionary stuff hinted at by TNG-era Trek.

[Dream]

Just because Starships have EMH programs doesn't mean they are used much or at all by doctors. Beverly Crusher herself swore she would never use one in First Contact until she was forced to use it as a distraction against the Borg.

Why doesn't Starfleet send out a crew of holograms to explore in starships? Well, what's the fun in that? You might be killed in a car crash outside, but staying indoors to be safe all the time would suck. Humans want to explore and that means being out there.

[Dream]

Gary7 wrote:

---

A "plausible" way to explain why this was never done is to say that the holo emitters are energy intensive and thus not practical in use for security purposes. Of course, if the doctor's mobile emitter is figured out and replicated, then...

I think Starfleet must be pissed that Janeway allowed the Doctor to continue to use his mobile emitter. It should be considered stolen future tech. How many times have the future been changed by the fact that the Doctor was able to leave sickbay and be involved in away missions, or the many lives he saved?

It wouldn't be surprising if the moment Voyager arrived back to Earth, they took the emitter and stuffed it in a box and kept it classified.

That is the ONLY way I can explain about how the Enteprirse crew in Nemesis never mentioned or used the supertech that Voyager back to the Federation in Endgame.

[Christopher]

Dream wrote:

---

It wouldn't be surprising if the moment Voyager arrived back to Earth, they took the emitter and stuffed it in a box and kept it classified.

That is the ONLY way I can explain about how the Enteprirse crew in Nemesis never mentioned or used the supertech that Voyager back to the Federation in Endgame.

Except that Nemesis took place only a year or two after "Endgame." We're talking about technology centuries ahead of the Federation's -- it could easily take years to reverse-engineer that and gain insight into its operating principles, then years or decades more to do the R&D on the offshoot technologies. It would've been far more implausible if they had been using those technologies that soon.

I figure the reason the mobile emitter wasn't confiscated by the Temporal Integrity Commission (Braxton's organization) was because it wasn't really that far beyond what the Federation already had, and that they already had prototypes for such a device in the works by the time Voyager got home, albeit probably on a larger scale. The Pocket novels bear this out; in the first couple of novels set after "Endgame," we see a mobile emitter about the size of a large briefcase.

[JirinPanthosa]

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

---

If follows in the same line of questioning, why doesn't Starfleet just send out probes or automated ships? Why send out crews?

Holograms are tools. They are only as ggod as their programming and will never replace a flesh and blood individual.

In real life logic, yes. In Star Trek logic, any AI as complicated as a human brain is sentient and capable of making the same decisions a human can.

And if we're talking about security and engineering, why not have a few extra squads of soldiers on your ship? Why not have a crew member who can walk through plasma to reach the control console?

[Christopher]

JirinPanthosa wrote:

---

In real life logic, yes. In Star Trek logic, any AI as complicated as a human brain is sentient and capable of making the same decisions a human can.

That should be true in real life as well, if and when such AIs came into existence.

And if we're talking about security and engineering, why not have a few extra squads of soldiers on your ship? Why not have a crew member who can walk through plasma to reach the control console?

Of course, the in-universe explanation is that the technology wasn't advanced enough for that yet; the EMH was a prototype. In theory, it's the sort of thing that very well could be coming along in the years following the 24th-century Trek we've seen. For instance, it might be valid to ask, in the context of the Star Trek Online game set in the early 25th century, why they still don't have things like Emergency Engineering or Security Holograms. (Indeed, that would work quite well there; you could say the whole crews were holograms being remote-operated by the players, and that would explain how a game character could have multiple lives.)