RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,538
Posts: 5,513,165
Members: 25,142
Currently online: 470
Newest member: lergondo

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 19 2013, 03:01 PM   #1
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
"Living tissue, warm flesh!": The WEIRD SCIENCE remakeapalooza thread



"Ceremonial."


Admit it - deep down, you knew this day would come. According to Deadline, Weird Science producer Joel Silver is producing... a new Weird Science film:
Universal Pictures and Silver Pictures will remake Weird Science, the 1985 ultimate nerd wish fulfillment comedy that was written and directed by John Hughes. The film will be produced by Joel Silver, who made the original with Hughes at Universal. Michael Bacall will write the script. He scripted the sleeper hit Project X for Silver Pictures and wrote the script for 21 Jump Street, another 80s-centric property that became a hit for Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill.

.... This film will attempt to carve out its own identity by being redrawn as an edgier comedy in line with 21 Jump Street and The Hangover, which were R-rated; the studio says the rating for Weird Science is not certain at this nascent stage.

As someone with a huge soft spot for the Weird Science franchise (not just the '85 John Hughes movie but the 1994-7 USA series also), but also one who recognizes the many flaws and shortcomings of both those incarnations, I've got a particularly strong case of reboot excitement/nervousness about this. I'd hate to see a terrible remake trash the name, but think there's absolutely room for improvement and elaboration upon the originals.

To throw out some more thoughts...

Good Signs:
- The 21 Jump Street movie was a ton of fun, and treated the friendship between the male leads pretty seriously. This is pretty key to the WS concept as we know it.
- Said movie also acknowledged that source show's existence and even in-narrative continuity in hilarious and irreverent fashion. I hope this remake also gives a clear shout-out to the original, maybe even throwing in a cameo or two.
- In addition to some raunch raunch potential, an R-rating should open up more dramatic and artistically deeper possibilities than those of the original movie and show.

- Not-so-good sign: Project X got pretty tepid reviews, and was widely viewed as being pretty crass and cruel in its humor. I'm all for a really randy Weird Science, but not a mean-spirited one.

Other thoughts:
- I'm up for following an entirely new duo/group of boys, but they've obviously got to keep the name Lisa. And the Oingo Boingo song! (Though I'm nor really looking forward to the inevitable Linkin Park-style cover...)
- Speaking of which, a British Lisa or gtho. Gemma Arterton and Hayley Atwell spring to mind, though a relative unknown a la Kelly LeBrock would be entirely acceptable also.
- This film can and should also rectify the original's inexplicable abscence of Thomas Dolby's classic "She Blinded Me with Science".


... Finally, I hope they keep in mind and preserve what the late Dean Ebert rightfully identified as the original movie's warm-hearted spirit: "Kelly LeBrock is wonderful as the fantasy woman, because she plays the character not for sex, but for warmth and an almost motherly affection for these two boys.... It could be soft porn, but the way she says it, her voice has a wink."
Gaith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 19 2013, 08:50 PM   #2
Garak
Talk to me, like lovers do
 
Garak's Avatar
 
Location: Manticore can't handle me
Re: "Living tissue, warm flesh!": The WEIRD SCIENCE remakeapalooza thr

Bring back Chet!!!

__________________
Ice up son, ice up.
Garak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.