RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,547
Posts: 5,513,373
Members: 25,143
Currently online: 517
Newest member: ShadowL

TrekToday headlines

Two New Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Dec 26

Captain Kirk’s Boldest Missions
By: T'Bonz on Dec 25

Trek Paper Clips
By: T'Bonz on Dec 24

Sargent Passes
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

QMx Trek Insignia Badges
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

And The New Director Of Star Trek 3 Is…
By: T'Bonz on Dec 23

TV Alert: Pine On Tonight Show
By: T'Bonz on Dec 22

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old March 13 2013, 11:18 AM   #61
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

My Name Is Legion wrote: View Post
Oh, now the idea is that Spielberg might not be worthy to direct Trek?
Well, Flake didn't like Indy 4.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 01:04 PM   #62
TREK_GOD_1
Fleet Captain
 
TREK_GOD_1's Avatar
 
Location: Escaped from Delta Vega
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

Dukhat wrote: View Post
Plus, you don't really believe this new movie is going to flop...do you?
After the success of First Contact, people said the same thing before Insurrection's release, but...
__________________
"...to be like God, you have the power to make the world anything you want it to be."
TREK_GOD_1 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 01:53 PM   #63
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
After the success of First Contact, people said the same thing before Insurrection's release, but...
Star Trek made 2.8 times as much money as First Contact, so there is a comfortable margin of error.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 13 2013, 07:41 PM   #64
Cap'n Claus
Rear Admiral
 
Cap'n Claus's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

Star Trek 09 didn't make twice it's budget money back in domestic gross (going by the estimated $150 million budget figures - if it was lower, then never mind), and compared to other recent franchise pictures, even the worldwide gross was pretty small to average. It's made more actual box office dollars than any previous Trek film, but The Wrath of Khan was actually more profitable by making it's budget cost back 11 times over.

In order for ST: Into Darkness to be an actual success, it has to make a shitload of money. I have no doubt that it will do extremely well, the trailers look incredible. Just remember that generally a film's success lies more in how much of its cost it makes back rather than strict B.O. bucks. 11 times vs less than twice? Considering the price of IMAX tickets and the general increase in price of the average admission, the number of people seeing Star Trek 09 in the theater was actually a lot less than than the number who paid to see Khan first run. For Star Trek, that's not that much repeat business, whether it had to do with the opinons of the film, or financial status of the audience (the days of my seeing a film multiple times in the theater are long gone).

Without judging the film itself at all, let's not let the $257,730,019 domestic box office go to our heads. For these types of films, that's not all that high. Into Darkness needs to bring in HUGE numbers, Dark Knight numbers, if it really wants to be one of the big boys.

Into Darkness will tell us if there really is an interest in Trek or if the 09 numbers were bourne out of curosity.


Also: I'm not worried about having different directors, but I am concerned about there being some sort of consistent vision for the concept. Motion pictures may be a director's playground, but these franchises need to be producer driven. So, even if Abrams doesn't direct the third film, he and his people need to be in place as producers - and not just "in name only" like Tim Burton on Batman Forever. It needs to be something like the Bond series, where the producers allow their directors a wide arena to play in, are willing to take risks, but still keep to a certain criteria to make sure the characters and situations are recognizable. You can do this without getting stale if you let your creative people do what they do.
__________________
"Tranya is people!"

Last edited by Cap'n Claus; March 13 2013 at 07:52 PM.
Cap'n Claus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2013, 03:28 AM   #65
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

ssosmcin wrote: View Post
Star Trek 09 didn't make twice it's budget money back in domestic gross (going by the estimated $150 million budget figures - if it was lower, then never mind), and compared to other recent franchise pictures, even the worldwide gross was pretty small to average.
385 million dollars is not "pretty small to average". Not only is it a lot of money, it makes Star Trek the most successful movie in the franchise domestically, internationally and adjusted for ticket sale inflation.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 14 2013, 04:40 PM   #66
Cap'n Claus
Rear Admiral
 
Cap'n Claus's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
ssosmcin wrote: View Post
Star Trek 09 didn't make twice it's budget money back in domestic gross (going by the estimated $150 million budget figures - if it was lower, then never mind), and compared to other recent franchise pictures, even the worldwide gross was pretty small to average.
385 million dollars is not "pretty small to average". Not only is it a lot of money, it makes Star Trek the most successful movie in the franchise domestically, internationally and adjusted for ticket sale inflation.
Looked at as money, yes, it's a lot (more than I'll ever see in my lifetime). Looked at as "how much profit," it isn't. The domestic box office gross was, again, not even double the cost to make the film (take out the huge publicity budget and it covered even less). That's what made TWOK a bigger success than TMP even though TMP made more actual money. For Star Trek, the 2009 box office was a fricking miracle. For other big budget action flicks, it's a drop in the bucket. Superman Returns made about $200 million, which is a lot of money. Except, that's what the film cost to make. So it was considered unsuccessful.

Considering what these established brand tentpole films haul in, $300 million domestic is just about average, but if you want to factor in worldwide (which you did), Star Trek came in far below. Trek never does as well overseas, not even JJ Abrams' version. When you consider Skyfall, The Dark Knight's, Transformers and some of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies made over a BILLION dollars in the international markets, Star Trek was a massive underperformer. With the good word of mouth from the last film and the successful previews, I'm sure Into Darkness will bring in more money than the last one, but Star Trek needs to make its most cash in the US.

I'm just going by the numbers. I'd love to see Star Trek in the winner's circle with Skyfall.
__________________
"Tranya is people!"
Cap'n Claus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 15 2013, 12:55 AM   #67
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

TREK_GOD_1 wrote: View Post
Dukhat wrote: View Post
Plus, you don't really believe this new movie is going to flop...do you?
After the success of First Contact, people said the same thing before Insurrection's release, but...
That's a bit different. Before Insurrection came out, most fans already knew everything about the story, and realized early that the story sucked. Compare that to STID, a film whose story is still pretty much a mystery, and which trailers make it look like a complete winner, whether the film ends up with a lousy story or not.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 04:02 AM   #68
PhaseIIforever
Ensign
 
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

I'd like Peter Bogdanovich to direct the next Trek movie and make enough money to buy the rights to the Orson Wells film The Other Side of the Wind and finally release it.

Last edited by PhaseIIforever; March 18 2013 at 04:36 AM.
PhaseIIforever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 11:08 AM   #69
mos6507
Captain
 
mos6507's Avatar
 
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

PhaseIIforever wrote: View Post
I'd like Peter Bogdanovich to direct the next Trek movie and make enough money to buy the rights to the Orson Wells film The Other Side of the Wind and finally release it.
That's pretty much what it would take to get me to show up to ST:ID with a big smile on my face.
__________________
Fem Trekz on Facebook
mos6507 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 01:47 PM   #70
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

I remember when people use to watch movies/TV simply for fun.
__________________
"...the most elementary and valuable statement in science, the beginning of wisdom, is I do not know." - Lt. Commander Data, "Where Silence Has Lease"
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 02:18 PM   #71
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

BillJ wrote: View Post
I remember when people use to watch movies/TV simply for fun.
A picture or it didn't happen.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 05:31 PM   #72
Greg Cox
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Oxford, PA
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

The Mirrorball Man wrote: View Post
BillJ wrote: View Post
I remember when people use to watch movies/TV simply for fun.
A picture or it didn't happen.
Check out the movie theater scene in The Blob--or any movie featuring a scene at a drive-in!
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com
Greg Cox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 18 2013, 10:57 PM   #73
wahwahkits
Commander
 
Location: England, somewhere between Liverpool and Chester
View wahwahkits's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

I sort of hope JJ won't be involved because with him the next movie probably won't be released until 2017.

Joss Whedon would be my choice
wahwahkits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 19 2013, 04:54 AM   #74
The Mirrorball Man
Vice Admiral
 
The Mirrorball Man's Avatar
 
Location: Switzerland
View The Mirrorball Man's Twitter Profile
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

wahwahkits wrote: View Post
I sort of hope JJ won't be involved because with him the next movie probably won't be released until 2017.

Joss Whedon would be my choice
If it were my money, after Alien: Resurrection, Titan: A.E and Serenity, I would not give Joss Whedon the control of a space opera franchise.
__________________
Check out my deviantArt gallery!
The Mirrorball Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old March 19 2013, 03:58 PM   #75
Sindatur
Vice Admiral
 
Sindatur's Avatar
 
Location: Sacramento, CA
Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

wahwahkits wrote: View Post
I sort of hope JJ won't be involved because with him the next movie probably won't be released until 2017.

Joss Whedon would be my choice
So, you'd rather wait until after 2017? Joss Whedon wouldn't be able to fit a Star Trek Film into his schedule any sooner than JJ Abrams
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am

Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
Sindatur is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.