star trek 3 without jjabrams

tmosler · January 25 2013, 05:27 AM

By know youve probly heard that jj abrams has went agienst what he said befoure about not directing the new star wars movie out of loyalty to trek.
So do to abrams directing the new star wars movie theres a big chance he will not direct the 3rd star trek movie. So i was just wondering what people here think about him not being in the 3rd star trek movie i think its good news because now paromunt might actually get a director who likes star trek to fill his spot.

Admiral Buzzkill · January 25 2013, 05:30 AM

Abrams will probably direct the third Star Trek movie - I certainly hope that he does - but if not he'll remain as executive producer, closely supervising the making of the film. It will be made to his taste; Paramount is completely supportive of his take on Star Trek because it's succeeding.

Bry_Sinclair · January 25 2013, 10:16 AM

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Temis the Vorta · January 25 2013, 06:10 PM

If Abrams isnt available and willing, Paramount will get another director, sure, but they could very well get one who likes Star Trek less (if by which you mean having a slavish devotion to canon or any individual's personal definition of what Star Trek is.)

Do you think all directors are in love with the subject matter before they make a movie, vs wanting to put their own stamp on it? But the bigger factor is the narrow range of what is considered acceptable anymore in a summer tentpole movie. Many of the complaints I've seen about Abrams' Star Trek movies are actually complaints about how movies are now, in general, and any director is going to be subject to those same constraints.

The Mirrorball Man · January 25 2013, 06:15 PM

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

Ronald Held · January 25 2013, 08:56 PM

Maybe a different director would help a little? Or after the 3d movie he will bail to make more SW movies?

YARN · January 25 2013, 10:39 PM

The Mirrorball Man wrote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

Neither have those lens flares in the 09 film.

Admiral Buzzkill · January 25 2013, 10:46 PM

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Would that be wise? It might startle the audience, after all, and after the prequels I'm not sure Star Wars fans can accustom themselves to any excitement.

lurok · January 25 2013, 10:54 PM

bigdaddy · January 26 2013, 12:43 AM

I hope JJ Abrams doesn't do another Star Trek, I have no clue how they plan on him doing a Star Wars movie in two years. Took his time making the second of his Star Trek movies after delaying and delaying and waiting until the last possible minute. I'd fire him and have a new Star Trek movie come out in 2015 too, have a new battle.

Admiral Buzzkill · January 26 2013, 12:47 AM

Yeah, so Star Wars can bury Star Trek. That's not a battle, that's a massacre.

No, thank you.

I hope Abrams does do another Star Trek. He's going to be in charge of it, whether he directs or not.

Enterprise is Great · January 26 2013, 01:10 AM

bigdaddy wrote:

I hope JJ Abrams doesn't do another Star Trek, I have no clue how they plan on him doing a Star Wars movie in two years. Took his time making the second of his Star Trek movies after delaying and delaying and waiting until the last possible minute..

Easy. The script for Episode 7 is being written right now from a George Lucas treatment. Abrams had to start from stratch with STiD so it's a different situation.

Mirror Sulu · January 30 2013, 03:20 AM

The Mirrorball Man wrote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

With all that blinding lens flare, the Stormtroopers will never be able to shoot anything.

R. Star · January 30 2013, 03:23 AM

Mirror Sulu wrote:

The Mirrorball Man wrote:

Bry_Sinclair wrote:

So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares?

Those lens flares jokes haven't lost their edge.

With all that blinding lens flare, the Stormtroopers will never be able to shoot anything.

Not like they ever could before.

Though anyone wonder if Berman and Braga are just hopefully waiting for their phones to ring?

Admiral Buzzkill · January 30 2013, 03:34 AM

No.

January 25 2013, 05:27 AM	#1
tmosler Lieutenant Commander	star trek 3 without jjabrams By know youve probly heard that jj abrams has went agienst what he said befoure about not directing the new star wars movie out of loyalty to trek. So do to abrams directing the new star wars movie theres a big chance he will not direct the 3rd star trek movie. So i was just wondering what people here think about him not being in the 3rd star trek movie i think its good news because now paromunt might actually get a director who likes star trek to fill his spot.

January 25 2013, 05:30 AM	#2
Admiral Buzzkill The Man Location: Defying Gravity	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams Abrams will probably direct the third Star Trek movie - I certainly hope that he does - but if not he'll remain as executive producer, closely supervising the making of the film. It will be made to his taste; Paramount is completely supportive of his take on Star Trek because it's succeeding. __________________ I had steak and a loaded baked potato for dinner on Sunday. As a steak I enjoyed it a lot, but as macaroni and cheese I thought it was disappointing.

January 25 2013, 10:16 AM	#3
Bry_Sinclair Commodore Location: Along the border of Talarian space	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams So does this mean that in the new Star Wars films when one of the Light Side characters appears on screen they'll be accompanied with blinding lense flares? __________________ Avatar: Captain Hilgrat Ja-Inrosh (deceased), Commanding Officer, U.S.S. Silverfin NCC-4470, Border Service Third Cutter Squadron Manip by: FltCpt. Bossco (STPMA)

January 25 2013, 06:10 PM	#4
Temis the Vorta Fleet Admiral Location: Tatoinne	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams If Abrams isnt available and willing, Paramount will get another director, sure, but they could very well get one who likes Star Trek less (if by which you mean having a slavish devotion to canon or any individual's personal definition of what Star Trek is.) Do you think all directors are in love with the subject matter before they make a movie, vs wanting to put their own stamp on it? But the bigger factor is the narrow range of what is considered acceptable anymore in a summer tentpole movie. Many of the complaints I've seen about Abrams' Star Trek movies are actually complaints about how movies are now, in general, and any director is going to be subject to those same constraints.

January 25 2013, 08:56 PM	#6
Ronald Held Rear Admiral Location: On the USS Sovereign	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams Maybe a different director would help a little? Or after the 3d movie he will bail to make more SW movies?

STAR TREK

CSI

ABOUT US

January 25 2013, 10:54 PM	#9
lurok Commodore Location: Lost In The EU Expanse	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams

January 26 2013, 12:43 AM	#10
bigdaddy Vice Admiral Location: Space Massachusetts	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams I hope JJ Abrams doesn't do another Star Trek, I have no clue how they plan on him doing a Star Wars movie in two years. Took his time making the second of his Star Trek movies after delaying and delaying and waiting until the last possible minute. I'd fire him and have a new Star Trek movie come out in 2015 too, have a new battle. __________________ "Bqhatevwr" - Former Senator Scott Brown

January 26 2013, 12:47 AM	#11
Admiral Buzzkill The Man Location: Defying Gravity	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams Yeah, so Star Wars can bury Star Trek. That's not a battle, that's a massacre. No, thank you. I hope Abrams does do another Star Trek. He's going to be in charge of it, whether he directs or not. __________________ I had steak and a loaded baked potato for dinner on Sunday. As a steak I enjoyed it a lot, but as macaroni and cheese I thought it was disappointing.

January 30 2013, 03:34 AM	#15
Admiral Buzzkill The Man Location: Defying Gravity	Re: star trek 3 without jjabrams No. __________________ I had steak and a loaded baked potato for dinner on Sunday. As a steak I enjoyed it a lot, but as macaroni and cheese I thought it was disappointing.