|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| General Trek Discussion Trek TV and cinema subjects not related to any specific series or movie. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#31 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: West of Boston
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
The episode where VOY beamed over a torpedo onto the small Borg scout vessel. The said scout vessel was smaller than Voyager. They were destroyed in 1 shot. I think the main info you should take away from this is if you don't kill everything on a borg ship in 1 shot, they'll regenerate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
Last edited by T'Girl; December 21 2012 at 02:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#34 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |||||||
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
Thaloron weapons The fact that these things may/do have serious side effects would probably be reason enough to not use them during normal times. But what about serious emergencies / war? Situations where the only other probably outcome is your death anyway. I’d probably be willing to use some questionable methods in a terrible, one-sided war like the Dominion War.
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
Many were not done because the writers just wanted to get back to the status quo of the show and forget about the incredible thing that they accidentally revealed that our heroes could do in one episode that then made all future episodes much more difficult to write. [Transwarp long-distance beaming in 2009 Star Trek movie.] And some of these were probably purposely not done by our heroes in episodes because they were suppose to represent a better version of humanity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
__________________
Author of Live Like Louis: Inspirational Stories from the Life of Louis Armstrong, http://livelikelouis.com. |
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
No man is impervious to temptation. We all have our breaking point. We are but mortal men in a universe far greater than us. This is not a fault, unless you think one should be as incorruptible as a Classical figure. But remember this: my Ancient Greek ancestors were no more or less human than I or any of us are. Don't base the truth of your life on the fiction of their literature. Man's fallibility, like his mortality, may make life more difficult but like most problems, it can be dealt with. |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
I mean, Star Trek already has some incredibly powerful stuff, most notably replicators, from which you can make almost anything. Yet, the Federation society we are presented with has not collapsed in on itself by everyone abusing the power. Although the show mostly “solves” this problem by ignoring it. We are never really told why humans don’t just live inside holdecks with their replicators and ignore the real world (which would really be a natural corruption of that power). It’s just a conceit of the show that humans have the power . . . but somehow don’t get corrupted by it. So, if we already feel comfortable with the idea that humans have not been corrupted by the powers they already have, why can’t we also incorporate new “powers” into the universe without having to explain why the humans are not corrupted by those as well? Is telekinetics (TOS “Plato’s Stepchildren”) or super speed (TOS “Wink of an Eye”) really all that more powerful or corruptible than [almost-]all-powerful replicators? |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Biggest 'Why don't they...' in Trek
It's one thing to develop a device over the course of years and decades and then it slowly moves into the mainstream culture vs. having the power of god dropped into your lap overnight.
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:01 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















