|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Voyager There's coffee in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Captain
|
Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
Would the character have been better had he been Nick Lacarno instead of Tom Paris? First off I doubt anyone would have hated Nick Lacarno based on that episode. Half the crew was Maquis and Seven was a borg, and Seven briefly increased the show's ratings. And Nick Lacarno was a kid, everybody makes dumb mistakes when they're in college, if anything they would have identified more with him than a guy who'd committed vague unknown crimes in the past. I think the character might have been stronger if he'd been Nick Lacarno. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Commodore
Location: Unmarked grave, Ekos
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
"Every time you think, you weaken the nation." --Moe Howard |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Admiral
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft." Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
But I guess the Locarno/Paris idea was that Locarno was seemingly a really good guy, but deep down he was flawed. Conversely, Paris was the guy who seemed like a bad guy but really was decent and good. Take your pick. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Admiral
Location: Militant Janeway True Path Devotees Compound. With Sehlats.
|
Re: Tom Paris or Nick Lacarno?
__________________
Rider: I can't believe you'd kill me for a field of empty holes. J'onn: It's all I have. ■ ■ ■ Janeway does Melbourne |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:35 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
















