RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 148,454
Posts: 5,879,600
Members: 26,315
Currently online: 475
Newest member: Polgara73

TrekToday headlines

The Red Shirt Diaries: Balance of Terror
By: T'Bonz on Oct 5

Salmond: Not Kirk
By: T'Bonz on Oct 5

Star Trek Beyond Dubai Filming
By: T'Bonz on Oct 5

Retro Review: Tattoo
By: Michelle Erica Green on Oct 3

Evaluation Ordered For Lien
By: T'Bonz on Oct 2

Shatner To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Oct 2

New Star Trek Beyond Pictures
By: T'Bonz on Oct 1

Star Trek Beyond Dubai Press Conference
By: T'Bonz on Sep 30

October-November 2015 Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Sep 29

The Red Shirt Diaries: The Conscience Of The King
By: T'Bonz on Sep 28

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Thread Tools
Old December 6 2012, 04:38 PM   #1
Location: Omaha, NE
Do the Nebula and the Galaxy-class share the same saucers?

I had always thought so. But there are features on the Galaxy's primary hull that don't show up on the Nebula's It also looks like the Nebula's saucer might be missing a few decks as well. And I thought I had read stats that suggested a ship width of 300-odd meters instead of the Galaxy's 460-odd meters.

Additionally, have we seen any other pods for the Nebula than the triangular tactical pod and the oval AWACs-style pod?
SicOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 6 2012, 05:26 PM   #2
Mark_Nguyen's Avatar
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Re: Do the Nebula and the Galaxy-class share the same saucers?

Pretty much all your answers are here:

There are arguably more than the two pod designs seen on the Phoenix and then the Sutherland - Sisko may have served on a variant with two smaller warp nacelles instead of a pod, since he has a model of it on his desk on DS9.

Can they still be called Nebula class despite having different shapes and sizes of saucer, secondary hull and pod? Probably... There are eight (soon to be 11!) principal variants of the Boeing 737 that fall into two general "looks" of the aircraft, not counting different lengths of the main hull. They're all 737s, though. OTOH, there are quite a few variants of the Arleigh Burke class destroyer (including those operated by other countries) and they all have different class names..

Mark Nguyen - Producer
The 404s - Improv Comedy Group

Oh, I like that Trek thing too...
Mark_Nguyen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 7 2012, 08:49 AM   #3
Re: Do the Nebula and the Galaxy-class share the same saucers?

It may also well be that the "generic" Galaxy saucer is fully compatible with the Nebula, but is only installed in exceptional cases, because it's far from optimal for the application. Say, during the Dominion War, standardized mass production of Galaxy saucers might be necessary, but the Nebula class would have no use for their impulse engines for reason X. For this reason, even the mass-produced saucers would have their engines faired over, in the manner we see e.g. on USS Bonchune - unless they received truly generic saucers that would soon be transferred to Galaxies and for that reason would retain the dead weight of the impulse engines.

A dedicated peacetime Nebula would have the completely different impulse engine arrangement familiar from the earlier physical models, such as Phoenix or Farragut. Transferring such a saucer to a Galaxy would be possible, but then the saucer could not perform detached operations, and would be reduced to mere emergency separations.

Perhaps Starfleet in the Dominion War wanted the detached operations capabilities of the Galaxy class, even though we virtually never saw this in combat or demonstrating combat value? Hence the "standardization" on Bonchune style rather than Farragut style saucers for the Nebula class, too. It may or may not have given the class the detached operations capability, but it would have kept the dockyards in the business of providing such capability for the other half of the fleet.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.