RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,444
Posts: 5,507,766
Members: 25,134
Currently online: 427
Newest member: xunixan

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 4 2012, 09:20 PM   #61
Lapis Exilis
Rear Admiral
 
Lapis Exilis's Avatar
 
Location: Underground
Re: Why is humor lacking in so much modern sci-fi?

RandyS wrote: View Post
Kegg wrote: View Post
Camp does not preclude taking your idea seriously. You can try to take a ridiculous idea seriously, like that casino planet.
Exactly. Camp (Which I still maintain that original Galactica was not), is not, contrary to popular belief, automatically bad.
Camp is most often quite good - if your taste runs to camp.

I think you all are having a bit of a semantical argument. For the record, camp is a style characterized by ostentatious, exaggerated, affected, and theatrical mannerisms. Often included in that definition is males acting with extreme effeminacy.

I don't actually think that the original BSG was strictly camp - though I didn't care for the show and have only ever watched a very small amount of it, so I may be wrong. For instance, I have no idea what the casino planet episode was. But, from what I recall of original BSG, it, like TOS in many ways, moved along a spectrum from fairly serious treatment of high concept story ideas to slap-you-on-the-back, wink-wink sort of jokes that were broadly telegraphed and ended with affected chortles by the actors. It was basic late 70s early 80s sitcom style humor that doesn't really include ostentatiousness or effeminacy. There's a certain affected quality to all early SF that often gets it plopped into the camp, er, camp, but it's not on the same scale as great masters of camp like Liberace.

Honestly I think the issue is that BSG's humor, like TOS's, isn't really funny. It's lame, obvious humor that makes you cringe in its rather painful effort to get a laugh. It tries too hard - but not really hard enough to be camp.

Now if Lorne Green had ever come out and given a full throated rendition of a Ethel Merman tune while wearing a pink feather boa...
__________________
Don't try to win over the haters; you're not the jackass whisperer. - Scott Straten
Lapis Exilis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.