star trek into darkness trailer release date

[Admiral Buzzkill]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

cheesy dialogue ,horrible acting, bad visual effects.
etc.

SW:Episode 1 and batman and robin had all these in their tailers.

So did the trailers for the 1977 film "Star Wars" and the 1982 film "Star Trek: The Wrath Of Khan." Your point fails.

[Jackson_Roykirk]

ralph wrote:

---

My guess trailer will be released with The Robbit, dec 14th.

"The Robbit"?
Scooby-doo, is that you?

[LOKAI of CHERON]

Jackson_Roykirk wrote:

---

"The Robbit"?
Scooby-doo, is that you?

[Procutus]

ralph wrote:

---

Abrams confirms that the Star Trek Into Darkness trailer coming at the end of the year. which the film will have a large audience in December? The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey. Children, teens, women. It is this audience that the studio wants to watch the movie, besides the trekkers, of course.

What, you mean the trailer's not going to be attached to Breaking Dawn, Part Two?

[serenitytrek1]

My Name Is Legion wrote:

---

So did the trailers for the 1977 film "Star Wars" and the 1982 film "Star Trek: The Wrath Of Khan." Your point fails.

oh dear,did you read my coments?I said some films not all films

[Dukhat]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

oh dear,did you read my coments?I said some films not all films

That makes your point even more irrelevant.

[serenitytrek1]

Dukhat wrote:

---

That makes your point even more irrelevant.

Okay let me update you to a more recent film ?

Did you ever see the first trailer for Green Lantern which was released in 2010? The movie came out the following year.

Infact here is the link...please watch it and rate the trailer.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8ZPg8uaoR0

Everybody knew the film will suck after watching that trailer. The trailer had everything I mentioned earlier. Cheesy dialogue and bad visual effect etc.

My gosh, if you can’t grasp the fact that some films will be terrible based on the trailer then maybe you should stop commenting.

[Dukhat]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

My gosh, if you can’t grasp the fact that some films will be terrible based on the trailer then maybe you should stop commenting.

I'm an avid moviegoer. I've seen plenty of movies and movie trailers to know that no one can judge a movie based on its trailer. Nor can they be a judge of someone's personal preference as to whether or not they will like or dislike the film.

Everybody knew the film will suck after watching that trailer. The trailer had everything I mentioned earlier. Cheesy dialogue and bad visual effect etc.

I didn't realize you took a poll of every person who went to see the movie to see whether they liked it or not. My apologies.

[Admiral Buzzkill]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

My gosh, if you can’t grasp the fact that some films will be terrible based on the trailer then maybe you should stop commenting.

If you can't stop being so thin skinned when people point out some of the foolish statements you make then you should definitely stop commenting.

Not everyone disliked the Green Lantern trailer - the second one was quite popular, and many of us enjoyed the movie quite a bit as well.

You really haven't made a valid point yet in this topic with all this trailer nonsense, so you might as well move on to another tack.

[serenitytrek1]

My Name Is Legion wrote:

---

If you can't stop being so thin skinned when people point out some of the foolish statements you make then you should definitely stop commenting.

Not everyone disliked the Green Lantern trailer - the second one was quite popular, and many of us enjoyed the movie quite a bit as well.

You really haven't made a valid point yet in this topic with all this trailer nonsense, so you might as well move on to another tack.

I think you’re the one been thin skinned, you’re scared to death that star trek 2013 will suck and also you call my comments foolish. You can’t handle the truth.

Thing is, I was talking of the first green lantern trailer and not the second one. The second one was much better but sill not great.

Bottom line is a lot of DC fans feared for the worst when they watched the trailers and they were right. The movie was terrible and was a failure both critically and commercially.

Now do I think Trek 2013 will suffer the same fate? NO I DONT.

[teacake]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

You can’t handle the truth.

This just doesn't read right without some capslock.

[Admiral Buzzkill]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

...you’re scared to death that star trek 2013 will suck

Nope, sorry. I'm confident that it will be great - no reason at all to think otherwise. I'm looking forward to the movie...and to the trailer, whenever it gets here.

and also you call my comments foolish. You can’t handle the truth.

I call your comments foolish because your comments are foolish. Understand something: you have no truth to impart on events that have not occurred, or on matters of taste. You can only offer an opinion.

If you can't step up your game you'll do well to cool down your overheated rhetoric.

[M'Sharak]

serenitytrek1 wrote:

---

I think you’re the one been thin skinned, you’re scared to death that star trek 2013 will suck and also you call my comments foolish. You can’t handle the truth.

serenitytrek1, knock it off.

You've been making quite a few hurried and poorly-considered posts lately, then picking squabbles with people who legitimately criticize your posts for being unclear, garbled, incoherent or simply incorrect. I would very much like not to see any more of that, beginning now.

[serenitytrek1]

My Name Is Legion wrote:

---

Nope, sorry. I'm confident that it will be great - no reason at all to think otherwise. I'm looking forward to the movie...and to the trailer, whenever it gets here.

I call your comments foolish because your comments are foolish. Understand something: you have no truth to impart on events that have not occurred, or on matters of taste. You can only offer an opinion.

If you can't step up your game you'll do well to cool down your overheated rhetoric.

I think you the one acting foolish and quite childish. My god what is with all you die hard fan males. I cant belive many of you are so deluded that you actually think there is not a good chance that star trek 2013 may be a bad film.

As a film fan, I am been realistic. Judging from your comments you seem to be one of those people that could threaten a film critic if they gave trek 2013 a bad review.

I don’t know what is so stupid about saying trek 2013 may be a bad film or may not live up to the first film.

I don’t want that happen at all ...however there is a good chance it might not be as good as the original.that is the way sequels are sometimes but not all the times.

That is the truth.You need to deal with it and stop getting all worked up.

What is rhetoric is too lash out at other people when they say something you don’t want to hear.

Tell me... what will you do if you go on rottentomatoes.com a day before the 2013 film is released and you see the score at 22% rotten out of a 100% .

Will you call the film critics and experts foolish?

[serenitytrek1]

M'Sharak wrote:

---

serenitytrek1, knock it off.

You've been making quite a few hurried and poorly-considered posts lately, then picking squabbles with people who legitimately criticize your posts for being unclear, garbled, incoherent or simply incorrect. I would very much like not to see any more of that, beginning now.

I find it sad that people call other people comment foolish because it differs from theirs. People always hate to hear the truth sp they mistake the truth for hate, incorrect, lies, incpherent, and garbled. What they like is sweet fluffy stuff where the world says yes to their reason.

star trek 2013 like any film sequel has a 50/50 chance of been good or bad. We fans don’t pray for the movie to be bad but the reality is, there is a possibility that the movie may get bad reviews. So we keep our fingers cross and hope for the best and yes a Trailer might act as a foreshadowing. Green Lantern and Batman and Robin had horrendous trailers and that is what the both movies turned out to be.

That all I am saying. what is so garbled about that.