RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,704
Posts: 5,431,709
Members: 24,834
Currently online: 433
Newest member: kamkaran


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Deep Space Nine

Deep Space Nine What We Left Behind, we will always have here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old October 14 2012, 01:13 AM   #16
t_smitts
Commander
 
Re: What if they'd kept T'Rul?

Jon-o'-lantern wrote: View Post
Mr_Homn wrote: View Post
At the very least it would have been nice if there was some explanation as to what happened to her and why the Romulans didn't care about monitoring their cloak.
Agreed. This made no sense. Every time the defiant use their cloak, It reminds me of this and I think "Why are the romulans cool with them having a cloak unsupervised again?.. oh yeah, no explanation."

It just seems weird that they wouldn't want to keep it supervised. With the cloak in starfleet's posession they could easily just dissect the thing and figure out new weaknesses in it, and how to exploit those weaknesses to gain an advantage on the romulans. I end up rationalizing it in my head as "The romulans gave them a shitty 20 year old out of date model of their cloak, so they dont care" but i don't even really buy that.
I go with that T'Rul's debriefing by her superiors would have gone a long way towards the plan to destroy the wormhole. Why risk someone with a high level of technical skill on DS9 when it is on the "make explode" list of things to do? Plus once the wormhole was gone they can recall the cloaking device and the Federation is more than likely to comply with that. In the end they got found out and the Federation and maybe the Feds used that leverage to keep the Romulans at arms length from their cloaking device.

The type of cloaking device on the Defiant might be compromised enough to limit the Defiant's danger to the Star Empire. As we saw in "Defiant" Sisko had info on the antiproton beam the Jem'Hadar used in "The Search" and gave it to the Cardassians, so it would be reasonable to assume the Romulans also have that data, which they might have decided is enough to prevent the Defiant from being a serious risk to them.
With or without the anti-proton beam, I don't think the concern about the Federation using ONE cloaking device against them. Their real concern would be Starfleet engineers studying and possibly reverse engineering it.

SAndrews10 wrote: View Post
I had heard Martha Hackett had a choice, she could recur on DS9 as T'Rul or recur on Voyager as Seska and since everyone was Voyager crazy at that point at the studios and there was so much buzz about Voyager and the launching of UPN she chose Voyager and the DS9 character was dropped.
I'm pretty sure Martha Hackett had no say in the matter.
t_smitts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14 2012, 10:50 AM   #17
Bry_Sinclair
Commodore
 
Bry_Sinclair's Avatar
 
Location: Along the border of Talarian space
Re: What if they'd kept T'Rul?

t_smitts wrote: View Post
SAndrews10 wrote: View Post
I had heard Martha Hackett had a choice, she could recur on DS9 as T'Rul or recur on Voyager as Seska and since everyone was Voyager crazy at that point at the studios and there was so much buzz about Voyager and the launching of UPN she chose Voyager and the DS9 character was dropped.
I'm pretty sure Martha Hackett had no say in the matter.
I would have to agree. Why would any actor turn down a stable job like that? Yes, they're heavy make-up, but it was two recurring roles on two Trek shows, at the same time.
__________________
Avatar: Captain Susanna Leijten, U.S.S. Silverfin NCC-4470, Border Service Third Cutter Squadron
Manip by: FltCpt. Bossco (STPMA)
Bry_Sinclair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2012, 06:40 PM   #18
SAndrews10
Captain
 
Location: Oriskany, NY 13424
Re: What if they'd kept T'Rul?

Both sides wanted Martha on their show, they couldn't decide amongst themselves as adults and sharing wasn't an option so she was given the choice of which show to be on. Idk why they didn't just recast the other role/and/or why the character was dropped. Who knows that's just the rumor/story I've heard from several people over the years.
__________________
Xander: (to Willow) So whatcha been doin'? Doing spells? (to Oz) She does spells with Tara.
Oz: Yeah, I've heard about that.
Xander: Sometimes I think about two women doing a spell... and then I do a spell by myself.
SAndrews10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2012, 06:57 PM   #19
DonIago
Rear Admiral
 
Location: Burlington, VT, USA
View DonIago's Twitter Profile Send a message via ICQ to DonIago Send a message via AIM to DonIago Send a message via Yahoo to DonIago
Re: What if they'd kept T'Rul?

I'd like a source for this.
__________________
--DonIago
It was the best of Trek, it was the worst of Trek...
"If I lean over, I leave myself open to wedgies, wet willies, or even the dreaded Rear Admiral!"
DonIago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 16 2012, 08:43 PM   #20
Mr_Homn
Captain
 
Mr_Homn's Avatar
 
Re: What if they'd kept T'Rul?

t_smitts wrote: View Post

With or without the anti-proton beam, I don't think the concern about the Federation using ONE cloaking device against them. Their real concern would be Starfleet engineers studying and possibly reverse engineering it.
indeed, it seems like an oversight for the writers not to address what would seem to be a huge tactical/security concern for the romulans.
__________________
"Thank you.. for the drinks."
Mr_Homn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.