RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 143,249
Posts: 5,602,684
Members: 25,414
Currently online: 364
Newest member: scotty5884

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Thread Tools
Old October 12 2012, 04:12 AM   #1
ngc7293's Avatar
Location: Michigan
Cold Fusion Reactors

In Trek, Fusion Reactors are mentioned here, there and everywhere. But I was wondering if they use Cold Fusion. I tried looking up Cold Fusion on Memory Alpha but got nothing.

Any ideas?
Judy Waxhorn: "Lighbulb is shot can't see a damn thing. Prepare to trash the ship. LaForge, disable the warp-core protection system. Troi, take the helm. All hands, prepare for DRAMA."
ngc7293 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 12 2012, 08:07 AM   #2
Re: Cold Fusion Reactors

Backstage sources suggest that the compression necessary for fusing the positively charged nuclei in starship reactors is achieved by "fusion initiators" (TNG Tech Manual pp.76-77), resulting in a "conventional P-P fusion reaction". This creates a "standing pulsed fusion shock" which supposedly keeps up the compression.

This is all backstage talk, not evident on screen. Even then, we have no idea whether the proton-proton fusion there involves high or low temperatures, or how the initiators are supposed to work. Forcefield compression to high pressure? Phaser pulses to high temperature? Something more conventional, or more exotic? For all we know, the fusion process might be a refined and elegant one, indeed "cold" by today's standards.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2012, 06:25 PM   #3
Rear Admiral
Re: Cold Fusion Reactors

People just can't let it go:

This is most likely a chemical reaction. Some news on that front:

This is interesting
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13 2012, 10:54 PM   #4
sojourner's Avatar
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Cold Fusion Reactors

^Star Trek is a fictional future. Absolutely no reason cold fusion might not work in that setting.
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.