|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| The Next Generation All Good Things come to an end...but not here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Captain
|
Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century characters
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
In fact, this was the episode that turned me off ST:TNG, after watching most of the first season. I thought, "OK, this isn't going to get any better."
__________________
“All the universe or nothingness. Which shall it be, Passworthy? Which shall it be?” |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Commodore
Location: Terra 3
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Sac, Ca
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
Plus the Romulan threat kind of helps reinforce just how silly and ridiculous most of their 20th century concerns really are-- which I think was probably the point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
Another episode I like just fine the way it is. Guess I must have low standards.
__________________
J.J. Abrams didn't change Star Trek, audience expectations did. |
||
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
I just love the way the 20th century "art of the deal" businessman sized up the Romulans within seconds, while 24th century "urbane" Picard sat in his captain chair absolutely clueless.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Commodore
Location: Asheville, NC
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
This exchange really felt like one of those instances where there was supposed to be more going on, but Maurice Hurley had to rush it because he wanted more scenes with our one episode only characters who will have zero relevance as the series progressed. Sometimes I wonder if instead of three 20th century humans that were picked up it would be three Romulans who were rescued. Without the Romulans telling the crew anything about what transpired at their outposts and them being unsure if it was the Federation that did it since they were rescued by Starfleet's most advanced vessel. And for the Enterprise crew to be suspicious of them in wondering if they had anything to do with the destruction of their outposts. Also, had there been no 20th century human characters, we would have been spared those preachy "Humanity has evolved!" and insulting "It's a wonder how we even survived as a species" moments. Last edited by Jeyl; September 27 2012 at 12:57 PM. Reason: Forgot the preachy part |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
So it ends up being fundamentally uninteresting, because it starts out devoid of elements of interest. Nobody does anything relevant, nobody says anything relevant, there are no characters involved (just talking heads with or even without names)... The Z plot with the Romulans ends up being nothing but a vehicle to show off Probert's newest cool starship design. The A plot was fine and well, but did suffer from being forcibly integrated to the Z plot in the end, with Offenhouse "contributing" (and making Troi wonderfully redundant once again). How about using the Ferengi instead, to give Offenhouse a task he would be uniquely competent at? Hey, they could even have settled the "Betazoids are no good with the Ferengi - or are they?" issue there rather elegantly. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
__________________
The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer. - former US Secretary of State and unconvicted war criminal Henry Kissinger |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Commander
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
That scene was a nice little reminder that they arent better at Everything ![]() -Kytee |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Captain
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
I think giving the Romulans more screen time would have made them more threatening, rather then just confusing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Somewhere in the South Pacific
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
__________________
"There are two means of refuge from the miseries of life: music and cats." - Albert Schweitzer |
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Sac, Ca
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
Plus it wasn't exactly hard to figure out that the Romulans were fishing for information. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Would the Neutral Zone have better without the 20th century charac
Chiefly, the scene serves to show how Picard realizes the man isn't as useless and out of place in the 24th century as it first appeared... Why, he could make for a fine starship captain one day, coming up with tactical conclusions just like Picard's own! As for the idea of the Romulans choosing to cooperate with Starfleet, and then turning a cold shoulder not twenty seconds into the dialogue... I don't think this really happens. What Tebok says is that cooperation will take place once either side figures out what has been going on at the Neutral Zone. At the time of the adventure, neither side has a clue, so there is no point in cooperating. Thus, Tebok's "Only if it's convenient and appropriate at the time": the time is not now. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:26 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















