|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
|
TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
Thanks--Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
__________________
Fans are like space heaters. All we have to offer is hot air. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Outpost Neris
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
http://www.cygnus-x1.net/links/lcars...m/03-17-01.jpg
__________________
USS Akula, NCC-1090 Guarding the Frontier so you don't have to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
Of course, it makes sense that the shuttlecraft would be stored and repaired on the deck level below the shuttle launch bay (that's what the combination turntable/elevator is for). Strictly speaking, then, the so-called "hangar deck" is actually the FLIGHT deck, where the shuttles are launched and retrieved. The level below should be called the hangar deck. But . . . picky, picky, picky. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
I've got an idea or two regarding how to get it to work as an elevator without having that giant spindle taking up valuable space. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albu...achine_424.jpg http://tos.trekcore.com/gallery/albu..._Babel_021.JPG However, we could argue that this deck was the one below the flight deck or shuttlebay. After all, we never see any of the familiar flight deck/shuttlebay features in the same shot with the door signs that say "hangar bay" or "hanger bay". And if shuttles are prepared for launch on the hangar deck, and then raised to the flight deck for the actual launch, it makes perfect sense for those doorways to lead to this lower deck rather than to the upper... The TOS-R versions of the episodes try to add some detail to the grey backgrounds of the "hangar decks" beyond the doorways, but this detail never really matches what is shown on the flight decks - especially since TOS-R adds a bit of detail to the flight decks as well, including windows on the floor level that should be quite visible through the doorway. At least before TOS-R, we could argue that the shuttle seen beyond the doorway was positioned so that it blocked the trapezoidal alcoves from being seen, since those might in theory have been the only floor-level detail "back then"! Let's also remember that whenever we see the shuttle through the "hanger deck" doorway, it's rotated differently from what we just saw in an establishing "flight deck" scene, at least in TOS. All the more reason to assume that it was moved down to a different deck by the turntable... For all we know, the turntable-elevator features some sort of an envelope that allows for the lower deck to be pressurized while the upper one is not. In any case, it doesn't seem as if Kirk's ship carries too many auxiliaries during TOS: at most two are ever seen at a time in TOS-R - and every time we see the full-size prop in TOS, its surroundings are distinctly devoid of other craft (doh!). TAS of course shows the upper level or flight deck crammed full of auxiliaries - six in "Mudd's Passion". Then again, it wouldn't be impossible to see an aircraft carrier's flight deck jam-packed with fighters at times. Sometimes carriers do take aboard more planes than they can actually operate (they were very practical as "aircraft transports" back when aircraft couldn't be ferry-flown overseas), and sometimes they move all the planes up from the hangars to clutter up the flight deck, perhaps for parading or other PR reasons, perhaps because the hangars need a bit of cleaning... I don't have anything against Kirk's ship carrying six shuttles in TAS, as long as most of them would "normally" be stowed below decks. ...After all, it does seem as if launching a shuttle requires quite a lot of space. It's not like precisely floating this small spacecraft out of its berth on thrusters, with only centimeters to spare - in TOS-R, we see on several occasions that the shuttles wobble and drift when "taking off", especially during Decker's crazed flight in "Doomsday Machine" but also during the supposedly routine takeoff in "The Galileo Seven". Mudd must have been exceptionally careful when taking off in that TAS episode... Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
--Tim |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Admiral
Location: I said out, dammit!
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
Not unlike the way carriers operate outside a war zone.
__________________
My kitbashes: http://www.inpayne.com/models/kitbash/trekpage.html My Kitbash Wallpapers: http://www.inpayne.com/models/wallpa...allpapers.html My kitbash calendar: http://inpayne.com/calendar/kbcalendar2013.html |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Commodore
Location: Wingsley
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
And remember that cargo bay we saw in the lower vortex of the refit saucer in TMP? Why can't the saucer have room for at least one small launch bay? After all, the saucer is supposed to be able to separate, right? What good is the saucer if it separates and has no means of housing shuttelcraft, at least in a limited fashion?
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..." -- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Llandudno
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
As for the TOS saucer, there's really very little, not even an airlock! The closest we get are those 2 grey strips on the underside, both of which have the following label (from cloudster.com): ![]() Is an "inspection door" even useable as an airlock? |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Vice Admiral
|
Re: TOS Enterprise Shuttle Storage?
__________________
. The things that come to those who wait -- will be those things left behind by those who got there first. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















