|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#76 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
![]() I actually find Duke to be the more entertaining of the three leads. Though when Duke found out he was a "trouble slayer" I was really hoping he'd make some kind of Buffy reference (Eric Balfour had a prominent guest role in the pilot episode). I was kinda disappointed when he didn't. ![]() I found Nathan to be kinda boring in the early going, but he's gotten better. Audrey's pretty interesting, too. I hope they have an actual plan in mind for her and haven't just been making it all up as they go. Oh, and as an Uncharted fan I got a kick out of the most recent episode, with Nolan North and Emily Rose reunited.
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
The writing on this show is horrible. If it weren't for the chemistry of the three leads, I don't know if I'd watch. The superpowered city-threatening troubles are insanely stupid and over the top (Emily Rose says she has a love-hate relationship with the "trouble of the week"). There's a lot of potential intrigue in the long term mystery, but so much of it so sloppily thrown together. |
|
|
|
|
|
#78 | ||
|
Admiral
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
||
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
It's definitely all about the characters, though. I agree that the three leads are very good and have good chemistry. But I also love the newspaper guys. In fact, they are the most New England-y part of the show. And, as a New Englander myself, I really enjoy the setting. |
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Oxford, PA
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
__________________
www.gregcox-author.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
Good casting for James. He looks like his daddy. And nice casting for the younger Duke, Vince, and Dave. |
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Commodore
Location: Honolulu Hawaii
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
I hope there are answers about who Audrey is in the next season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
![]() Definitely great casting on the younger characters.
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
You forgot to mention that we saw young Dave and Vince. |
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Idealistic Cynic and Canon Champion
Location: RJDiogenes of Boston
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
|
Re: Haven: Season Three (Discussion, Spoilers)
I liked younger Vince. I like tall, broad-shouldered men.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:28 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.



















