RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,442
Posts: 5,507,501
Members: 25,133
Currently online: 452
Newest member: jokerone

TrekToday headlines

Retro Review: The Emperor’s New Cloak
By: Michelle on Dec 20

Star Trek Opera
By: T'Bonz on Dec 19

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Thread Tools
Old September 1 2012, 03:05 PM   #16
Cookies and Cake
Location: North America
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Apologies, NrobbieC, mine was a general question. I should have said "one" instead of "you".

Really, there's no right or wrong answer to the question of whether TWOK is good or bad. I was just trying to get a handle on exactly how much lower than #1 one would have to consider it, before it would have to be called "overrated".
Cookies and Cake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 05:32 PM   #17
Vice Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

no, it's the film that pretty much saved the movie series for Trek after the poorly received TMP. There are some problems to it(Sulu and Uhura are neglected, Khan's "genius" is talked about but never displayed, how is a planet misplaced, etc.) but it is overall a very good movie.
sonak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 06:10 PM   #18
LOKAI of CHERON's Avatar
Location: Post-apocalyptic ruins of my once mighty Homeworld.
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

NrobbieC wrote: View Post
I'm just saying I can understand why some older fans consider it as good as they do despite the fact I feel it's a massive clunker.
Your opinion is as valid as the next guy of course, but, age notwithstanding, it's quite a surprise to see TWOK described as "a massive clunker"!
LOKAI of CHERON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 06:14 PM   #19
The Squire of Gothos
Rear Admiral
The Squire of Gothos's Avatar
Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

I'll echo everyone else who says it's a good film, but the adulation of fans and discussions in a Trek only context have caused it to be over rated in certain circles.

Enjoyable, but if it wasn't preserved by the US Library of Congress for future generations, I would be neither surprised nor perturbed.
The Squire of Gothos
The Squire of Gothos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 06:36 PM   #20
Vice Admiral
JarodRussell's Avatar
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

It's the best Star Trek film, but not a very good film by itself. Says a lot about Trek films as a whole.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 07:10 PM   #21
Fleet Captain
PPatters's Avatar
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Ya know, it's never personally been my favorite film. (The Voyage Home was always my favorite. Some may disagree, but it's just a personal statement )

I do recognize that it has some very positive aspects. As a villain, Khan is exceptional. The death of Spock is one of the most moving scenes in Star Trek ever. Period. (In my opinion, of course.)

I just never really got into all of the action, but that's really a personal preference. And I do think that some parts of the story seemed a bit misplaced. The whole Captain Terrell plot was just a bit awkward to me, personally.

Is it over-rated? Perhaps, a bit. But, despite it not being to my personal taste, I do think that it does some great things.
PPatters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 09:16 PM   #22
Psion's Avatar
Location: Lat: 40.1630936 Lon: -75.1183777
View Psion's Twitter Profile
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

This is the film where Nick Meyers hopped up and down calling for "more winkie-blinkies" in the background to liven up scenes. This philosophy even extended to the bosun's whistle used to pipe Admiral Kirk's party aboard. From the idiot lights, to the overwrought uniforms, to the questionable astrophysics of the Ceti Alpha system, there's plenty left wanting in Wrath of Khan.

And yet, I still kind of like it. It's hardly a clunker, but seeing younger fans characterize it as dull and slow says a lot about how much film-making has changed. This was an action-adventure popcorn flick back in its day, and maybe explains why extraordinary coincidences that help the heroes were so tolerated in the most recent movie; they served to keep the movie going at a fast pace.

So ... to wrap up: definitely over-rated, but still one of the better Star Trek movies.
Twinkies are back. I knew they couldn't stay away from me for long.
Psion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1 2012, 10:00 PM   #23
Vice Admiral
MauriceNavidad's Avatar
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View MauriceNavidad's Twitter Profile
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

I've never got the love for Khan as such a great villain. He doesn't do much of anything in the movie. He sticks mind control things in two Starfleet guys, gets control of their ship, catches Kirk off guard, then gets outsmarted for the rest of the movie and blows himself up. He has one good scene on the planet, then Montalban's wasted for the rest of the film.
* * *
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.”
― Winston S. Churchill
MauriceNavidad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 03:56 AM   #24
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Khan's considered great not because he's well-written but simply because Montalban is so much fun to watch - he's so good at doing what he's called upon to do in this movie. There's never been an actor who's played heavy in any version of Star Trek who made such an impression, never an actor as exuberant and skillful at chewing scenery not out of egoism but because the part he was reading simply demanded that he go over the top. Colicos and Carmel would be distant seconds. The rest of 'em...meh.

Look at the length and variety of Montalban's career in movies and of course countless episodes of all kinds of TV shows - and yet the two things he's probably best known for are playing the host on Fantasy Island and hissing dialogue like "THIS is Ceti Alpha V!"

(Okay, maybe something to do with leather car seats as well. Maybe.)

TWOK is Montalban, period.

As for over- or underrated...the American Film Institute just finished the latest of what seems to be a recurrent (maybe it's annual) month-long series of screenings of memorable '80s movies. These things include E.T., of course, and Bladerunner and John Hughes movies and so on, about what you'd expect...

...I don't recall them ever running a Star Trek movie, including Star Trek II. TWOK was a modest hit - cost about 11 million to make, pulled in 80 million at the box office - but was not one of the most talked-about hits of summer 1982. Non-trekkies who remember those movies now are likely to say, "I liked the one with that guy from Fantasy Island. Was that the one with the whales?" So it's vastly overrated by Trek fans relative to its real significance or success.

Last edited by Admiral Buzzkill; September 2 2012 at 04:18 AM.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 04:12 AM   #25
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

I think so, but less by trekkies than by popular culture. Of the TOS movies, perhaps of all except the 2009 reboot, TWOK is the most famous. Before Id even started watching Trek I knew that TWOK was supposed to be the best, and even if you dont, you'll recognise a lot from pop culture. This is one of the reasons the reboot used so much TWOK, it wanted a connection with the films best and most well-known franchise.

Additionally, theres no denying that most star trek movies arent particularly amazing, so I think it becomes overrated just because it stands out. I kind of feel the same about 'First Contact', I dont actually like that movie, but dismissing that I think it gets overrated in general because it stands out as the only TNG film people tend to like. Sure, some people like Nemesis and Insurrection, but Ive found those people to be in a minority.

I think TWOK is a really good film, but if its a 10/10 for Trek its probably a 7/10 in general.
TheLobes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 07:11 AM   #26
Fleet Captain
M.A.C.O.'s Avatar
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Reading through the posts I get the feeling that the fans have hyped the movie up just like Khan is hyped up. It's true Khan doesn't really do much aside from being a standard bad guy with a ship. He tortures some crew members, kills some civilians, manages to get the jump of the ENT while it's shields down and survive to the end just to lose to the heroes. In that respect Khan is comparable to the Borg in FC, Shinzon in NEM, and Nero in XI. Although no one shows the same adoration for these villains even though in a measurable sense these villains were much more successful. I get the sense Trek fans want Khan to be Trek's Darth Vader and Khan really doesn't have the star power for the role.

The story behind the Genesis project is intriguing but it's not very developed even though it was talked about a lot. Khan wants it but never states why. It's the audience and the fans who have to connect the dots for his motivations. More evidence of the fans filling in the blanks for Khan's character and actions.

TSFS has more of an adventure behind it. Stealing the ENT, assaulting Star Fleet personnel, fighting Klingons, escaping an exploding planet. However Spock's revival, and David's death I think hurt TSFS because they were so important to the story of TWOK.
M.A.C.O. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 11:23 AM   #27
lurok's Avatar
Location: Lost in the EU expanse with a nice cup of tea
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Meyer's audio commentaries are worthwhile lessons in directing. He got Montalban to dial it back (if you can believe that) and therefore make Khan more deadly, and worked out how to get a decent performance out of Shatner. The age factor thing someone quoted is bullshit. A good film is a good film no matter when it was made or when you saw it. By that reckoning I should like the TNG films more, but I don't.
"Anál nathrach, orth’ bháis’s bethad, do chél dénmha"
lurok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 11:53 AM   #28
Green Lantern
Fleet Captain
Green Lantern's Avatar
Location: The bad of whoever pays for the night.
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

AllStarEntprise wrote: View Post
Is Wrath Of Khan overrated?
Yeah, it is. It's not even the best film of the TOS films, let alone all of them. Personaly, every TNG film tops any TOS film. Generations being my favourate. The first film ever was the worst one, they all looked so camp in that. Still prefer it to Voyeger though. Voyeger sucks.
Green Lantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 12:34 PM   #29
Fleet Admiral
teacake's Avatar
Location: Google's ass cave full of the lush, lush asses they have stolen.
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

KHAN himself is fabulous. Charismatic and thrilling and believable.

The rest of it was clunky.

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 2 2012, 12:36 PM   #30
Vice Admiral
MauriceNavidad's Avatar
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
View MauriceNavidad's Twitter Profile
Re: Is Wrath of Khan Overrated

Montalban's performance is fine. The part is just very underwritten.

It's not a bad film. It's just got this reputation amongst some fans of being one of THE great movies, and it's not.
* * *
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip.”
― Winston S. Churchill
MauriceNavidad is online now   Reply With Quote


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:58 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.