RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,234
Posts: 5,406,205
Members: 24,762
Currently online: 611
Newest member: PaulHicks

TrekToday headlines

Star Trek Online Adds More Voyager Actors
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

The Wil Wheaton Project Axed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

Kurtzman’s Production Company Signs Deal
By: T'Bonz on Sep 2

Retro Review: Time’s Orphan
By: Michelle on Aug 30

September-October Trek Conventions And Appearances
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Lee Passes
By: T'Bonz on Aug 29

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old September 11 2012, 07:36 PM   #1
FredH
Captain
 
Smaller ships' architecture

Ever since 1975, new Starfleet ship designs for the TOS era (both fan-created and on-air canon) have tended to be based around variations of the classic components -- nacelles and the big round saucer -- and to be in a comparable size range. But TOS-R's version of the Antares, derived from the animated series, offers a nice related-but-alternate architectural platform for smaller ships that might do the majority of Starfleet's unglamorous "grunt work." I wonder if anyone's thought about other specialized ship classes using those components (small flat rectangular hull spaces, with additional hull sections or pods attached at perpendicular angles, downsized nacelles)? There could be hundreds of these (the "spaceships," per "Bread and Circuses"?) handling everyday tasks of various types throughout Federation space, while the big ships (the "Starships") are deployed for major diplomatic, exploratory and military missions, maybe?
FredH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2012, 09:28 PM   #2
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

It's the way I've always viewed it. You have frontline starships carrying out the fairly big missions with a number of rarely seen (if ever) support ships carrying out very routine logistical operations (personnel transfer, equipment and supply deliveries, etc.).

But in the more distant reaches of the Galaxy, you may see some of the frontline starships carrying out logistical support missions too (in both TOS and TNG, the Enterprise was sometimes ferrying cargo and passengers to and from various locations).
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 11 2012, 10:13 PM   #3
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

FredH wrote: View Post
"...while the big ships (the "Starships") are deployed for major diplomatic, exploratory and military missions, maybe?"
Not maybe, you essentially quoted the book (Making of Star Trek, part II, chapter 3), the way you described it is the way the series' producers envisioned it.

Bob
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12 2012, 09:08 AM   #4
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

On the other hand, what we see done by the Enterprise may also be grunt work of sorts. Nothing precludes the existence of even more glamorous and perhaps larger ship types that don't run errands in extreme deep space, but rather concentrate on winning decisive battles or representing the UFP in the best possible light on diplomatic cruises through luxury and splendor unavailable aboard the Enterprise.

As for using those Antares modules for varying tasks, "Charlie X" almost spells this out for us: Kirk wavers between considering the Antares herself a "cargo vessel" or "transport ship" and "science probe vessel". The latter role is supported by the fact that this humble freight-runner made a mysterious diversion to Thasus, where supposedly there's no freight to be picked up or delivered. Perhaps some of the modules on the Antares (say, the entire crew compartment) were UE Space Probe Agency add-ons that turned this otherwise standard automated cargo drone into a secondary survey asset?

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 12 2012, 08:25 PM   #5
Patrickivan
Fleet Captain
 
Patrickivan's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

The fact that vessels engage in multi-role assignments outside their core design intent, I would say that it's safe to assume the there are a shit load of ships of various design within the federation. Space is MASSIVE, and the federation engulfs a silly volume of space.

That said- like now, most ships have a "look" that identifies them as ships, or vessels that float. The same goes for Airplanes. There are some very specific exceptions like submarines and rotary wing aircraft. And I can see the design principals in the federation being mostly the same (the bulk of ships are very identifiable- two nacelles, engineering section, command section), with of course those exceptions like our subs and helicopters (let's say the defiant from DS9 as an example).

Opps- gotta go. Hope you get my point.
__________________
http://patrickivan.wordpress.com/page/2/

40 Years and ticking. Damn, that's too old fashioned.
40 years and still processing!
Patrickivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 15 2012, 03:52 AM   #6
Saturn0660
Rear Admiral
 
Saturn0660's Avatar
 
Location: NE Ohio
View Saturn0660's Twitter Profile
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

Anyone thats played SFB know the SSD sheets made the Fed Frigates look very box like.
__________________
How many lights do YOU see?
Saturn0660 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 21 2012, 12:18 AM   #7
Robert Comsol
Commodore
 
Robert Comsol's Avatar
 
Location: USS Berlin
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

Let's not forget the original SS Aurora before TOS-R transformed this ship into something else. In particular I like the ancient look of the warp nacelles of this ship, maybe that's the kind the Constitution Class ships had before they all got Enterprise's latest ones.
__________________
"The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the truth" Jean-Luc Picard
"We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein
Robert Comsol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 21 2012, 02:55 PM   #8
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Smaller ships' architecture

On the other hand, the Aurora in both versions of the adventure is suggested to be a tiny pleasure cruiser easily commandeered by space hippies, not the "NCC-C1200" early Starfleet cruiser that some fan sources identify her as (in a misunderstanding of what Todd Guenther and Mike Morrisette meant with their fan blueprints). Drawing a connection to actual Starfleet hardware might be a bit artificial.

Just musing. I'm personally sort of thinking that the Catullan bigwig who owned that cruiser would not have settled for an "ancient" design... Although of course it's cute to think of the Aurora as the Volkswagen Kleinbus of its time, too.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.