|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you? |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#46 |
|
Commander
Location: Burton, UK
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Commander
Location: Burton, UK
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Commander
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Just for perspective, a modern day .40 S&W handgun has but a fraction of the energy of a ST phaser or energy shield power source-and yet if the gun is loaded with a defective round with too much powder, a case failure can result in some injury to a shooter's hands. If a phaser or power shield goes critical on your hip, I hope your name's Daniel Jackson .
__________________
There is a time for everything, and a season for every activity under Heaven:A time to heal, A time to break down, and a time to build up. -Ecclesiastes 3:3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
It occurs to me that the power cell on a portable shield belt or armband would probably make a fairly efficient suicide bomb.
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Those TAS belts do have a modular appearance, with the big box at the small of your back but with various subdivisions to the forward part. Yeah, it's probably supposed to look like a futuristic buckle at the front, a slim nonfunctional belt around the waist, and all the machinery in that box. But the clumsy artwork necessarily makes it look more substantial than that, especially when Kirk takes his off. It would be easy to argue that the front features include panels hiding the (otherwise unseen) controls; detachable power packs; and perhaps other functionalities as well. Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Timo Saloniemi |
|
|
|
|
|
#55 | |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Anyway, we saw Worf create a personal force field in A Fistful of Datas.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |||
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
Chicago police officers wear the vest. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE. OF. THEM. They wear it because they're REQUIRED to wear it. They wear it because this is Chicago and every braindead wannabe thug with a .22 thinks he's Alonzo Harris. Which is relevant, ultimately, to the broader point: Starfleet finds itself in hazardous situations often enough that for any organization with any amount of common sense, basic ballistic protection should be MANDATORY for away teams. We've seen officers getting killed by boomerangs, wooden spears, plant spores, and -- yes -- even bullets. If forcefields aren't up to the task, which I VERY STRONGLY doubt, the lack of some kind of protective gear for a well-defined hazardous situation is profoundly irresponsible on Starfleet's part. Basically, much like cops who don't wear their vests, they are stupid people who work for an organization that condones their stupidity.
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#57 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Lieutenant Junior Grade
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
It makes perfect sense for a computer game and would fit peoples idea of personal protection but would it look right/make sense on the show week in week out (though maybe in DS9 as they are in war time). |
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: I'm in your ___, ___ing your ___
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
__________________
It appears to be powered by some form of electricity... |
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Why the lack of personal protection?
-Eyepiece display, tied into suit systems and personal gear -Built-in passive and active scanners -EVA capability, with pressure helmet and optional thruster pack. -Built-in medical aid systems (dermal regenerators and the like) -The materials of the suit are laced with nanites that patch it up. When the suit gets jacked into a power terminal, the little guys can do their thing. -"Mutliphasic wave generators", which prevent hostile transporter lock-ons. There's also a portable transporter buffer, which is a novel way of explaining away the ability to carry eleventy billion different weapons in a universe-appropriate context, but I think it ubers transporter tech a bit much.
__________________
Fans are like space heaters. All we have to offer is hot air. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















