RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,602
Posts: 5,424,879
Members: 24,810
Currently online: 402
Newest member: David Ellerman

TrekToday headlines

September Loot Crate Features Trek Surprise
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

USS Enterprise Miniature Out For Refit
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Comic Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Trek 3 Shooting Next Spring?
By: T'Bonz on Sep 16

Star Trek: Alien Domain Game Announced
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Red Shirt Diaries Episode Three
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Made Out Of Mudd Photonovel
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Takei Has Growth Removed
By: T'Bonz on Sep 15

Retro Review: Tears of the Prophets
By: Michelle on Sep 12

New Wizkids Attack Wing Ships
By: T'Bonz on Sep 12


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How do you rate The Amazing Spider-Man?
Excellent 23 33.82%
Good 29 42.65%
Fair 10 14.71%
Poor 4 5.88%
Terrible 2 2.94%
Voters: 68. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old July 1 2012, 08:19 PM   #46
davejames
Vice Admiral
 
Location: Sac, Ca
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Yeah I saw that, but I don't know if I would call 80% "divided down the middle."
davejames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2012, 08:29 PM   #47
Relayer1
Commodore
 
Relayer1's Avatar
 
Location: The Black Country, England
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

the G-man wrote: View Post
From what I've read, the consensus appears to indicate that they should have just done Spidey 4, with the new cast.
I could have lived with that, even though I wasn't very impressed with the first three (although the second one had its moments).

I'm not big on reboots but this at least looks better than its predecessors. Fingers crossed...

PS - there's talk of cross licensing Spidey into Avengers universe !
__________________
Soon oh soon the light, Pass within and soothe this endless night, And wait here for you, Our reason to be here...
Relayer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2012, 09:20 PM   #48
PKerr
Rear Admiral
 
PKerr's Avatar
 
Location: Tampa Fl
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Count me as another that will eventually see the film but not overly excited.

For me one the first things I noticed was the gawd awful ugly suit and that kind of just stuck in my craw.
The second was another re-boot, why? just call it Spidey 4 and be done with it.
PKerr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1 2012, 09:31 PM   #49
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

the G-man wrote: View Post
Spidey Peters out: hardly awful but not coming close to living up to that adjective in the title either. Sometimes dull and mostly uninspired, it’s much less a satisfying reboot like “Batman Begins’’ than a pointless rehash in the mode of “Superman Returns.’’
This.
As noted they should've called this Spider-man 4 and kept the Raimi continuity in check. Enough of the main players are already in place for "Pete's sake"!!

The Deadline article praises the overseas $50m opening but states that tracking in the States is flat.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 2 2012, 04:00 AM   #50
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

This evening I popped in Spider-Man (2002) DVD and watched this after not seeing it for some years.

I loved it all over again. I even found Kirsten Dunst acceptable whereas before not so much. If I look at her portrayal of MJ in terms of how Peter sees her as opposed to how I see her then it works.

My only quibbles production wise were the same ones I had when the film was released, and they're minor. The scenes where Peter makes his first leaps across rooftops just doesn't look right. After that I don't have any problems with it. Certainly some of the acrobatic scenes still gave me a touch of vertigo. Also the Goblins suit didn't really work for me. I understand not going with the original comics' design, but I sill think something better could have been done.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 02:58 AM   #51
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gotham
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Sony wanted a clean break from Rami and his continuity, which is why they came up with the reboot and decided not to hire another director to carry on the Rami'Verse. The alleged leaked treatment for "Spider-Man 4" was horrid. Essentially it would have turned out to be basically "Spider-Man 3.5" which was what a lot of fans were calling it anyways at the time. It would have potentially turned out to be the Spider-Man equivalent of "Batman and Robin" which was something Sony wanted to avoid big time.

Marc Webb interview. He's joking about Mime

http://collider.com/amazing-spider-man-sequel/177106/
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 03:15 AM   #52
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Hmm, this is rather cutting.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991, 2013-?
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 03:41 AM   #53
JacksonArcher
Vice Admiral
 
JacksonArcher's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to JacksonArcher
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

I'm seeing it tonight. It better be amazing.

Or else.
__________________
"Please... We need you to hope again... " - Professor Charles Xavier, X-Men: Days of Future Past
JacksonArcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 03:59 AM   #54
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

JacksonArcher wrote: View Post
I'm seeing it tonight. It better be amazing.

Or else.
What if it's spectacular? Or sensational?
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 04:03 AM   #55
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gotham
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Or Ultimate!
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 04:05 AM   #56
Professor Zoom
Vice Admiral
 
Professor Zoom's Avatar
 
Location: Idealistic
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Or FRIENDLY?
__________________
Batman does not eat nachos.
Professor Zoom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 04:28 AM   #57
Admiral James Kirk
Writer
 
Admiral James Kirk's Avatar
 
Location: Tucson, AZ
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Or Web Of... ish? Damn you guys! You got all the good titles!
Admiral James Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 07:21 AM   #58
Kestra
Vice Admiral
 
Kestra's Avatar
 
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

JacksonArcher wrote: View Post
I'm seeing it tonight. It better be amazing.

Or else.
I saw it tonight but only because we had free tickets and got to laugh at the people sitting in line for hours for a midnight showing. Seriously, was it that anticipated of a film? These people were camped out for a long time.

It was okay. It made me feel old. I didn't like the Peter Parker character and I didn't like his girlfriend. She was completely ridiculous, as a person like that would clearly never exist. There was also way too much cheese for me in the movie. Is Spiderman just a really cheesy franchise though? Feels like it.

I love how they glossed over the suit making. Nice sewing and crafting skills Peter! Do you secretly lurk on the Etsy forums?

The fact that it was a reboot so close to the previous films also made for an awkward viewing experience. There were a ton of points that jogged up images and lines from the previous incarnation.

I'll end on a good note (because it really wasn't a bad movie). Normally I hate 3D and the glasses but these were comfortable and I enjoyed some of the scenes of him zipping around the city quite a bit. Especially the nighttime scenes.
__________________
"You're not my type." --Manticore
Kestra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 09:15 AM   #59
clint g
Admiral
 
Location: No where
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Well, just got finished seeing it and I loved it. Consider me pleasantly surprised, I would have bet money that it would suck. The audience seemed to have been pleased as well
__________________
It's nothing personal, just business
clint g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 3 2012, 10:48 AM   #60
Aragorn
Admiral
 
Aragorn's Avatar
 
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man Review and Discussion Thread (spoilers)

Roger Ebert gives it *** 1/2 out of **** stars. This is from his opening paragraph:

In its broad strokes, "The Amazing Spider-Man" is a remake of Sam Raimi's "Spider-Man" (2002), but it's not the broad strokes we care about. This is a more thoughtful film, and its action scenes are easier to follow in space and time. If we didn't really need to be told Spidey's origin story again, at least it's done with more detail and provides better reasons for why Peter Parker throws himself into his superhero role.
Aragorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
spider-man

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.