RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,229
Posts: 5,438,262
Members: 24,957
Currently online: 612
Newest member: zanejc

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Enterprise

Enterprise The final frontier has a new beginning in this forum!

View Poll Results: Should ENT have used the EM pistol more?
Yes 15 93.75%
No 1 6.25%
Voters: 16. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old December 20 2012, 10:57 PM   #1
davidant32
Commodore
 
davidant32's Avatar
 
Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

In the first episode, we see the crew firing energy bursts instead of the familiar energy stream. IIRC, these weapons are phased () out of the show during the pilot episode, or soon thereafter. Why not keep the EM pistol rather than immediately switch to the familiar phase pistol?

Personally, I thought the idea of firing energy bursts was cool and helped distinguish the show from the other Treks. I wish they had continued as such for the rest of the series.

Thoughts?
__________________
Space, time, and thought are not the separate things they appear to be.
davidant32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:03 PM   #2
Jar Jar Binks
Admiral
 
Jar Jar Binks's Avatar
 
Location: Skywalker
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Yes, I think it should have remained their primary sidearm throughout the whole show. I liked that it was a pulse weapon instead of a beam weapon, but that's not why I prefer it over the phase pistol. The EM-33 had no stun setting. ENT was supposed to be a bit more contemporary than other Treks, due to its relative closeness to our own timeframe, and it was also supposed to be a bit grittier. Having the crew use a sidearm that could only wound or kill, with no easy option like a stun setting, would have fit that idea perfectly.
Jar Jar Binks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:18 PM   #3
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Hanukkah Solo wrote: View Post
Yes, I think it should have remained their primary sidearm throughout the whole show. I liked that it was a pulse weapon instead of a beam weapon, but that's not why I prefer it over the phase pistol. The EM-33 had no stun setting. ENT was supposed to be a bit more contemporary than other Treks, due to its relative closeness to our own timeframe, and it was also supposed to be a bit grittier. Having the crew use a sidearm that could only wound or kill, with no easy option like a stun setting, would have fit that idea perfectly.
Nothing more I could add to this.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:21 PM   #4
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Maybe that was the producers' original intent, for all we know. Berman & Braga originally wanted the show to be truer to its prequel roots -- no transporters, no time travelers from the future -- but the network was wary of the prequel approach and insisted on including more familiar Trek elements. Maybe that happened with the weaponry as well.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 4/8/14 including annotations for Rise of the Federation: Tower of Babel

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:25 PM   #5
ChristopherPike
Rear Admiral
 
ChristopherPike's Avatar
 
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

They managed to fix that slightly in Season 3, when the MACOs came onboard. They had rifles which I assume wouldn't have been Starfleet issue. The front of the barrel resembled the EM-33 but were longer, and held from under the shoulder.

That moment in the pilot with Archer giving covering fire, a pistol in each hand, was a particularly cool moment. Nothing screams sci-fi prequel better than a lack of beams, and projectile like bolt weaponary that ricochets, recoils and occasionally misses.

Of course, once we were shown aliens with more more advanced tech were accustomed from Voyager backwards...

It was a shame they lost that original away team jacket too. Those vivid blue ones in a quilted leather.

They reappeared, worn by the crew during "Oasis" and then gone... in favour of the dull grey canvas-looking ones.
__________________
STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE Season 5 on Netflix Facebook page

Last edited by ChristopherPike; December 20 2012 at 11:39 PM.
ChristopherPike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 20 2012, 11:31 PM   #6
R. Star
Rear Admiral
 
R. Star's Avatar
 
Location: Shangri-La
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Doesn't really matter. Enterprise called a lot of the familiar techs something else to sound "primitive" across the board rather uniformly, even though they did the exact same thing. One less instance of it really wouldn't have mattered.
__________________
"I was never a Star Trek fan." J.J. Abrams
R. Star is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 12:53 AM   #7
Gaith
Rear Admiral
 
Gaith's Avatar
 
Location: Washington, DC
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Maybe it was a cost/practicality issue? Small numbers of beams being easier to direct on set/animate later than large numbers of bursts?
Gaith is online now   Reply With Quote
Old December 21 2012, 07:10 AM   #8
teacock
Admiral
 
teacock's Avatar
 
Location: teacake
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

ChristopherPike wrote: View Post
It was a shame they lost that original away team jacket too. Those vivid blue ones in a quilted leather.

They reappeared, worn by the crew during "Oasis" and then gone... in favour of the dull grey canvas-looking ones.
I loved those quilted leather jackets. Extremely attractive.
__________________

"Damnit Spock. God damnit!" Kirk ST:V
■ ■ ■
Janeway does Melbourne
teacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 25 2012, 02:20 AM   #9
The Wormhole
Admiral
 
The Wormhole's Avatar
 
Re: Should ENT have used the "EM pistol" longer in the show?

Those EM Pistols looked really cool, like actual guns as opposed to the bulky "ray gun" like phase pistols. I always thought it a shame we never saw more of them. Hell, Borken Bow was the only time we saw one fired, I think. The MACOs left them holstered most of the time.

Hell, I wouldn't have minded the use of "phase pistols" if they had used that design for them.
__________________
"Internet message boards aren't as funny today as they were ten years ago. I've stopped reading new posts." -The Simpsons 20th anniversary special.
The Wormhole is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.