|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Literature "...Good words. That's where ideas begin." |
| View Poll Results: Rate Plagues of Night. | |||
| Outstanding |
|
56 | 52.34% |
| Above Average |
|
34 | 31.78% |
| Average |
|
10 | 9.35% |
| Below Average |
|
5 | 4.67% |
| Poor |
|
2 | 1.87% |
| Voters: 107. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#466 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Typhon Pact: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
Yours might as well. I was not supposed to recieve RtD untill tomorrow according to estimate I got when ordering. Then, suddenly, last saterday I got an email in the morning saying it was shipped. Few hours later I was reading. ![]() Different company, but still, you never know.
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#467 |
|
Captain
Location: Stain'd-by-the-Sea
|
Re: Typhon Pact: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
I am disappointed by two things. It seems that we're getting a war with the Typhon Pact. We don't need another war story. I noticed a few times where characters' POV summed up the events of the novel up to that point. I thought that it was unnecessary. |
|
|
|
|
#468 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: MD, USA
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
"I managed to find Uno and Checkers, and also parts of Battleship and most of the pieces of Candy Land, which I figure, I can mix together to create a fabulous new game, CandyShipBattleLand. War never tasted so good." - Lorelai Gilmore |
|
|
|
|
#469 |
|
Admiral
Location: KingDaniel has fallen Into Darkness (in England)
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
Star Trek Imponderables, fun video mashups of Trek's biggest continuity errors. Episode One Episode Two |
|
|
|
|
#470 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
The opening portion does certainly provide an appropriate reconciliation of ZSG with RBoE, where the biggest surprise was that the changing of the guard in the Romulan Empire happened before the main events of ZSG. We now see that even though the RSE is whole again, there are still some rogue elements that the new praetor is unable to reel in.
__________________
Star Trek: War Aftermath -- "Omega" Star Trek: Lambda Paz -- "To the Bitter End" I look forward to your letters... |
|
|
|
|
#471 |
|
Commodore
Location: Washington, DC
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
The Almighty Star Trek Lit-Verse Reading Order Flowchart - be confused no longer about what to read next, or what to read first. 12/5/12: Now brilliantly updated by 8of5! |
|
|
|
|
#472 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Seattle
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
"Can anyone remember when we used to be explorers?" |
|
|
|
|
#473 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
The political story is more interesting. Alas the first 50 pages is recapping the previous TP books. Even if it's from different angles, it was still irritating. The phase cloak is confirmed at least. Still don't know why Starfleet isn't completely freaking out about this like the Typhon Pact is flipping out over slipstream. Seems like a warbird could just hold station in the Palais and Starfleet HQ to listen in on policy and strategy. As an aside, where are Starfleet's transphasic torpedoes nowadays? The biggest problem: lack of focus. This book jumps all over the place, seemingly at random. First half of the book doesn't feel it's going anywhere in particular. Scene after scene plays out without a sense of building towards anything. I'd be hard pressed to say who the actual main character is here. I'd probably say Romulan Praetor Gell Kamemor. Here we are with the Cardassian castellan. She plays no real role later. There we are with Ro bizarrely freaking out over her chief of security without much context that then has to be explained later. This feels like such an unreasonable assumption on Ro's part that I almost hope it turns out to be true later. Sort of like the mole in Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy. At least in the movie. I really did like the Enterprise-E finally going into the Gamma Quadrant. That was cool. So glad that Spock finally left Romulus. That's only been a subplot that's been spinning its wheels since 1991. Holy cow. Has it been that long now?! Geez. As for the book's last line. Well, I was able to move right into Raise the Dawn after reading this, so I got my answer right away. Strangely enough, I don't know how to feel about it. I guess I've become so disappointed with DS9 lately that I just don't care anymore. Sure doesn't seem like TPTB cared about the station anymore either. Even though it was a character that we watched grow over the years. I guess they've fully embraced how we're not going to see this era of Trek on screen ever again. So anything is fair game. My point of view has always been that it should have been about the station and the characters assigned to it.
__________________
Out of 4 stars: The Folded World: **1/2 The Weight of Worlds: *** Devil's Bargain: *** Last edited by Sxottlan; August 4 2012 at 03:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#474 |
|
Commodore
Location: Washington, DC
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
The Almighty Star Trek Lit-Verse Reading Order Flowchart - be confused no longer about what to read next, or what to read first. 12/5/12: Now brilliantly updated by 8of5! |
|
|
|
|
#475 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
It was much better than Plagues, but it still seemed to jump all over, like it was trying to cover too much story at once. |
|
|
|
|
|
#476 |
|
Commodore
Location: Washington, DC
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
The Almighty Star Trek Lit-Verse Reading Order Flowchart - be confused no longer about what to read next, or what to read first. 12/5/12: Now brilliantly updated by 8of5! |
|
|
|
|
#477 |
|
Commander
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
|
|
|
|
|
#478 |
|
Commodore
Location: Washington, DC
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
Actually, I find that's been true of DRG3 a few times. Serpents Among The Ruins, especially, spends a lot of time just summarizing history and laying groundwork; if the last 10% or so wasn't such an insanely perfect series of twists and surprising connections, it would be like a 7/10 at most. But that ending makes it an obvious 10. I felt the same way about Dawn, but I can see how you wouldn't.
__________________
The Almighty Star Trek Lit-Verse Reading Order Flowchart - be confused no longer about what to read next, or what to read first. 12/5/12: Now brilliantly updated by 8of5! |
|
|
|
|
#479 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
Which is why I never rated this book by itself. It's so much a two-parter, that I felt I could only grade it AFTER reading RtD, since so many parts of the plot and characterdevelopment is left for the second part. It would be like watching part one of a two part episode, then judging both episodes based on that first episode.
__________________
Niner. Lurker. Browncoat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#480 |
|
Fleet Admiral
|
Re: TP: Plagues of Night by DRGIII Review Thread (Spoilers!)
__________________
Admiral Young Chief of Operations Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011. |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:30 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.





















