|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Voyager There's coffee in this forum! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Captain
|
Did Voyager have bad continuity?
http://blip.tv/sf-debris-opinionated...review-6141673 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Sacramento, CA
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
__________________
One Day I hope to be the Man my Cat thinks I am Where are we going? And why are we in this Handbasket?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: in a figment of a mediocre mind's imagination
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Commodore
Location: Kentucky
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
There were various name drops to prior episodes. My one complaint, though, is how frigging huge the Delta Quadrant is. Just of the top of my head, they jumped 10,000 light years in both Dark Frontier and The Gift, 20,000 or so in Timeless not to mention the other jumps they made, factoring in the five years, they'd traveled almost 45,000 light years and were STILL in the Delta Quadrant. They should've at least been in the Beta Quadrant by that point. BTW, I'm ignoring such inconsistencies as the shuttle count and photon torpedo compliment
__________________
"Divine intervention is unlikely." - The Doctor |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Admiral
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
Turned out to be closer to 80 chapters. After 5 weeks, I just decided never to go back to that store ever again. Some buggers job was to make us think that the details of this universe were worth obsessing over and that every thing was important and connected, but I doubt that the people in charge of highlighting these importances were anywhere near the pit where they make Star Trek. I leant what I had to a friend. 3 years later I found that they had accidentally spilled an entire milkshake on the binder, and that all the pages were glued together, and it was easier to say that they would get around to finding it than replacing the frivolous investment.
__________________
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft." Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Captain
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Great Britain
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Commander
Location: A distant corner of the Zeta Quadrant...
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
Two things that always baffle me: 1. In "Dark Frontier" Chakotay tells Janeway that she fiddles with her combadge every time she's about to drop a bombshell. She never does this at any other time, before or after this episode. ![]() 2. At the end of "Unimatrix Zero" we see Janeway in sickbay after being de-borgified, and she seems perfectly fine. It's all "oh just these damn spinal clamps" and nothing more. Picard was haunted for years after his assimilation and yet Janeway's all fine and dandy?!That is what bothers me about Voyager's continuity; they address something once (mostly in the later seasons) and then never go back to it.
__________________
"It's never easy, but if we turn our backs on our principles we stop being human." - Kathryn Janeway, "Equinox Part 1". |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: North America
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
Picard lead the BORG in destroying Starfleet's armada at Wolf 359 (?). Janeway just punked the Queen. IMO she didn't have anything to feel guilty over. My biggest complaint re: dropped ideas/"continuity" was that Axum was left on a BORG ship in a remote section Beta Quadrant. They made it sound "impossible" for him to return as a plot point, and yet he's on a BORG ship that can traverse vast distances in a blink of an eye.
__________________
"But life is a battle: may we all be enabled to fight it well!" Charlotte Bronte |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Commander
Location: A distant corner of the Zeta Quadrant...
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
2. I was referring the horrific physical transformation she went through in being turned into a drone. I think that would leave her a little shaken to say the least. You don't just recover from something like that without a little trauma. 3. Ah yes, Axum. I had forgotten about him. It really doesn't make sense that he cannot be retrieved. I would much rather have had him and Seven as a pairing rather than C/7.
__________________
"It's never easy, but if we turn our backs on our principles we stop being human." - Kathryn Janeway, "Equinox Part 1". |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: The Digital Garden
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
Nobody seems to remember, notice or care about the canon facts about Trills mentioned in TNG that are all but forgotten by DS9 or the inconsistency in the Cardassian uniforms in flashback episodes of DS9 and how those weren't the same style uniforms worn in TNG when they're introduced. However, I think LOST, Law & Order and Voyager have shown you can still do a show that's fairly inconsistent and still grab a mass audience. Besides, isn't the common stereotype about Trek/sci-fi fans is that we nitpick issues that don't matter to anybody else? I very much doubt the casual viewer that watched Voyager was counting the shuttles or the torpedos and TPTB were very much aware of this and most likely found our complaints about it unimportant or unavoidable due to last minute script changes.
__________________
Life's a bitch.........until you have a orgasm. Last edited by exodus; May 18 2012 at 03:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: The Digital Garden
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
Picard wasn't prepared for it, the Borg took him against his will. Janeway gave herself to them willingly. She was already mentally prepared for the assimilation and de-assimilation process. The Borg bent Picard to their will, Janeways mind was never fully connected to the collective. So Janeway her will was still her own. Unlike Picard or Sisko, Janeway didn't fear the Borg. Thanks to Picard and other captains that faced the Borg, it gave her enough insight to know how to circumvent them.
__________________
Life's a bitch.........until you have a orgasm. Last edited by exodus; May 18 2012 at 03:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
Commander
Location: A distant corner of the Zeta Quadrant...
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
__________________
"It's never easy, but if we turn our backs on our principles we stop being human." - Kathryn Janeway, "Equinox Part 1". |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
Fleet Admiral
Location: The Digital Garden
|
Re: Did Voyager have bad continuity?
We've seen Picard have major heart surgery and walk out the door right after it was done like nothing happened. We've seen Harry Kim walk away from an 8472 infection with no lasting trauma. The only time I can recall seeing physical trauma in Trek is when someone looses a limb or spinal surgery.
__________________
Life's a bitch.........until you have a orgasm. |
|||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| continuity, voyager |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.


















