RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 139,113
Posts: 5,400,449
Members: 24,744
Currently online: 516
Newest member: Ohwowmelody

TrekToday headlines

Trek Merchandise Sale
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek #39 Villain Revealed
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Trek Big Bang Figures
By: T'Bonz on Aug 28

Star Trek Seekers Cover Art
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Fan Film Axanar Kickstarter Success
By: T'Bonz on Aug 27

Two New Starship Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Actor Wins Emmy
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

Trek Retro Watches
By: T'Bonz on Aug 26

New DS9 eBook To Debut
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25

Trek Ice Cube Maker and Shot Glasses
By: T'Bonz on Aug 25


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Trek Tech

Trek Tech Pass me the quantum flux regulator, will you?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old May 22 2012, 10:09 PM   #46
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

captain crow wrote: View Post
They only would have needed the one decale sheet that came with the kit since the only the markings the ship had were the name and registry on top the saucer.
No, the registry was also on the nacelles:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdoft...7619514479789/
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22 2012, 10:20 PM   #47
Knight Templar
Commodore
 
Location: Oklahoma
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

Once again, why do we make a big deal about registry numbers of Starfleet vessels?

Even real life ship numbers for the U.S. Navy can be all over the place for various reasons both practical and political. Why should it be any different for Starfleet?
Knight Templar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 22 2012, 10:49 PM   #48
captain crow
Fleet Captain
 
captain crow's Avatar
 
Location: Onboard a sliver dog bone shaped satellite in Earth orbit
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

Dukhat wrote: View Post
captain crow wrote: View Post
They only would have needed the one decale sheet that came with the kit since the only the markings the ship had were the name and registry on top the saucer.
No, the registry was also on the nacelles:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdoft...7619514479789/
Actually yes, they could have done it with just the decal sheet that came with the kit by using the the saucer bottom "NCC-1701" decals which are similar in size to ENTERPRISE.


"C" from NCC
"O" zero from 1701
"N" "S" "T" "E" from ENTERPRISE
"L" "L" modified E's from ENTERPRISE
"A" three 1's from 1701
"T" 1 and top of 7 from 1701
"I" from ENTERPRISE
"O" zero from 1701,
"N" from NCC
__________________
"I calculated the odds of this succeeding versus the odds I was doing something incredibly stupid, and I went ahead anyway." - Crow T. Robot, Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie
captain crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23 2012, 12:38 AM   #49
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

captain crow wrote: View Post
Actually yes, they could have done it with just the decal sheet that came with the kit by using the the saucer bottom "NCC-1701" decals which are similar in size to ENTERPRISE.
I'm not saying they couldn't have done it; I was stating that the name and registry weren't the only markings on the model, as you claimed.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23 2012, 01:38 AM   #50
captain crow
Fleet Captain
 
captain crow's Avatar
 
Location: Onboard a sliver dog bone shaped satellite in Earth orbit
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

Dukhat wrote: View Post

I'm not saying they couldn't have done it; I was stating that the name and registry weren't the only markings on the model, as you claimed.
Sorry about omitting the nacelle decal. I haven't watched "The Doomsday Machine" in a while and the first picture I found of the Constellation online was at just the right angle where you can't see it.
__________________
"I calculated the odds of this succeeding versus the odds I was doing something incredibly stupid, and I went ahead anyway." - Crow T. Robot, Mystery Science Theater 3000: The Movie
captain crow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23 2012, 02:32 AM   #51
yenny
Captain
 
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

captain crow wrote: View Post
Dukhat wrote: View Post

I'm not saying they couldn't have done it; I was stating that the name and registry weren't the only markings on the model, as you claimed.
Sorry about omitting the nacelle decal. I haven't watched "The Doomsday Machine" in a while and the first picture I found of the Constellation online was at just the right angle where you can't see it.
You're right about the decal being on the Constellation nacelles. Trekcore has screencaps from the episode which show the registry on the Constellation nacelles.
Anyway, they must had use more then one model kit. If you look at the screencaps when the Constellation heading into the mouth of the planet killer. You will notion that they did little work on that model.
yenny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23 2012, 05:40 PM   #52
137th Gebirg
Rear Admiral
 
137th Gebirg's Avatar
 
Location: Who is John Galt?
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

Dukhat wrote: View Post
captain crow wrote: View Post
They only would have needed the one decale sheet that came with the kit since the only the markings the ship had were the name and registry on top the saucer.
No, the registry was also on the nacelles:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/birdoft...7619514479789/
Y'know, this picture almost makes it look like the registry might have been something else at one point. You see the area around the zero? It seems to be whiter than the surrounding area, like someone had started off doing something different and had to change it by scraping/sanding the decal off an already-painted/battle-damaged hull. The zero and the second one also appear to be lighter than the first one and the seven, like they might have been drawn in with pencil to match the font rather than a decal. This is really weird, now that I look at it more closely.

Edit: On second thought, it could also be a reflection of the direct lighting used to illuminate the model for filming. Can't tell on a still image.
__________________
Gebirgswick - Ind, Tra, Sec & Env.
137th Gebirg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 23 2012, 08:04 PM   #53
Boris Skrbic
Commander
 
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

But 1017 is canon and accepted even by "Treknical Fandom", so why would anyone want to see a different registry number? I don't understand the point of this discussion. Even if we were to find actual documentation proving that 1017 was an error, there is no point to changing it now. It's everywhere, so an alternate version would only be alternate. I'd like to see the real thing, a reconstruction of the onscreen model, preferably un-Remastered.
Boris Skrbic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2012, 12:37 AM   #54
Dukhat
Commodore
 
Dukhat's Avatar
 
Location: Baltimore, MD
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

Boris wrote: View Post
I don't understand the point of this discussion.
The OP asked if anyone had ever spoken to Jeffries about his decision to make the Constellation's registry number 1017, based on the possibly false assumption that Jeffries had anything whatsoever to do with that decision. He wants to build a replica of the model, but wants to know what the registry "should have been," the consensus of which seems to be that it should have been exactly what was on the model as seen in the episode.

Then, much to the OP's dismay, the topic segued into exactly what class the ship was, based on the (IMHO) slight differences between the AMT model kit and the large filming model, and the low registry, even though official sources state (and the intention of the producers was) that the ship was the same as the Enterprise.
__________________
“Don’t believe everything you read on the internet.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Dukhat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2012, 08:29 AM   #55
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

...Regarding the one segue not yet made in full, how come we're so convinced the Constellation had decals?

I mean, it's not as if we're seeing Microgramma Bold Extended with the fancy double borders or anything. It's just straight lines. Decals would appear to be overdoing it when a marker pen would be so much quicker and easier.

If decals weren't involved in making the pennants, then the logic of reusing the digits from NCC-1701 doesn't hold, and the number probably is an utterly random one...

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24 2012, 02:41 PM   #56
137th Gebirg
Rear Admiral
 
137th Gebirg's Avatar
 
Location: Who is John Galt?
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

I think the assumption that they used decals stems solely from the lack of imagination in the numbers used, being simply rearranged from the Enterprise's registry out of the model kit. If it was done manually, in pencil or ink or whatever, why not come up with some different numbers then? Maybe it's coincidence, but then again, as the OP said, there doesn't seem to be any first-hand information on how this thing was made, so we will likely never know.
__________________
Gebirgswick - Ind, Tra, Sec & Env.
137th Gebirg is online now   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2012, 01:49 AM   #57
Green Shirt
Commodore
 
Green Shirt's Avatar
 
Location: 21133
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

yenny wrote: View Post
It is mention on Space Seed that the Enterprise is a Constitution class starship.
Who mentioned that?
__________________
Its not easy being green.
Green Shirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2012, 01:52 AM   #58
Unicron
Continuity Spackle
 
Unicron's Avatar
 
Location: With the Dead Poets
Send a message via ICQ to Unicron
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

IIRC, the schematic that Khan studies has the words "Constitution class" on it, which implies that the Enterprise is of this class since he asked for her technical journals.
__________________

"My dream is to eat candy and poop emeralds. I'm halfway successful."


Catbert, Evil Director of Human Resources
Unicron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2012, 03:08 AM   #59
Mr. Laser Beam
Fleet Admiral
 
Mr. Laser Beam's Avatar
 
Location: The visitor's bullpen
View Mr. Laser Beam's Twitter Profile
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

^ And the other journals, the ones that Scotty is seen reading in ST VI, also say Constitution class.
__________________
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion. It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning. It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
Mr. Laser Beam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 28 2012, 03:53 AM   #60
throwback
Captain
 
Re: Matt Jefferies and NCC-1017

I don't think we ever saw the schematic that Khan was looking at in "Space Seed". The schematic was seen in "The Trouble with Tribbles". Like I said before, if we stay within the canon and within the original series, we didn't see a Constitution-class starship. The Making of Star Trek classifies the USS Enterprise as an Enterprise-type starship.

Now as for the classification of the Enterprise as a Constittution-class starship in the Star Trek Concordance, I am accepting this on faith alone as I have never seen the first edition. Now, I would like to know, what was Bjo Trimble's source for this information?
throwback is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.