RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,386
Posts: 5,358,002
Members: 24,626
Currently online: 679
Newest member: suryaprabu02

TrekToday headlines

The Gene Roddenberry Project Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Moore: No Deep Space Nine Regrets
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Pegg Star Wars Rumor
By: T'Bonz on Jul 30

Borg Cube Fridge
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Free Enterprise Kickstarter
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Siddig To Join Game Of Thrones
By: T'Bonz on Jul 29

Sci-Fried To Release New Album
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek/Planet of the Apes Crossover
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Star Trek into Darkness Soundtrack
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28

Horse 1, Shatner 0
By: T'Bonz on Jul 28


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Movies > Star Trek Movies I-X

Star Trek Movies I-X Discuss the first ten big screen outings in this forum!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 4 2012, 08:28 PM   #61
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Well, living legends or not, I'm sure there were plenty in Starfleet who disapproved of Kirk and his methodology.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 4 2012, 08:37 PM   #62
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Yup. Haters exist even in the 23rd-Century...
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4 2012, 08:42 PM   #63
Ronald Held
Rear Admiral
 
Location: On the USS Sovereign
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Which is better from a public POV, giving Kirk and crew a ship of the same class, Constellation or Excelsior class?
Ronald Held is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 4 2012, 09:53 PM   #64
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Ronald Held wrote: View Post
Which is better from a public POV, giving Kirk and crew a ship of the same class, Constellation or Excelsior class?
Probably the Connie, since that's the one he's been associated with his whole career.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 4 2012, 11:14 PM   #65
tighr
Commodore
 
tighr's Avatar
 
Location: California
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

I'm on board with the Yorktown being renamed as Enterprise-A following a refit. As has been pointed out, it's happened canonically with the Sao Paulo, so I am willing to believe that it could happen off-screen with the Enterprise. It could also have been any other Constitution class ship. I simply don't think they would have given him a brand new Constitution, even if they thought he deserved a brand new ship (which he didn't).

That being said, by renaming the Yorktown to Enterprise-A, they're effectively killing the Yorktown. As we know, it later gets new ships as well. There is at least one Yorktown in 2293, because Tuvok's father serves aboard it. Other than the Enterprise and the Yamato, I don't know of any other ships that have letters after their registry (including the Defiant).

Meanwhile, I was flipping through Memory-Alpha to reacquaint myself with the time period, and I was shocked to realize that there is essentially zero time lapse after the events of ST:VI and the events of ST: Generations. Both take place in 2293, so it would stand to reason that the Enterpise-A was indeed decomissioned that year to make way for the Enterprise-B.
__________________
~Tighr™: Not helping the situation since 1983
tighr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 12:03 AM   #66
BK613
Captain
 
BK613's Avatar
 
Location: BK613
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

IMO, is a refit or new build and not the Yorktown. Makes more sense time-wise if the construction was already underway when the whale probe arrives.

Also, don't know if someone has mentioned it but it might not have been Starfleet that decided to rename the ship. Could have been the Federation Council that made the call. I like to think that the FC legislated in perpetuum the whole Enterprise is NCC-1701-x thing as part of the "punitive reward" the crew gets. And so Starfleet can never change the association.
__________________
-------------------
"The single biggest problem with communication is the illusion that it has taken place." - George Bernard Shaw
BK613 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 12:14 AM   #67
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

tighr wrote: View Post
I'm on board with the Yorktown being renamed as Enterprise-A following a refit. As has been pointed out, it's happened canonically with the Sao Paulo, so I am willing to believe that it could happen off-screen with the Enterprise. It could also have been any other Constitution class ship. I simply don't think they would have given him a brand new Constitution, even if they thought he deserved a brand new ship (which he didn't).

That being said, by renaming the Yorktown to Enterprise-A, they're effectively killing the Yorktown. As we know, it later gets new ships as well. There is at least one Yorktown in 2293, because Tuvok's father serves aboard it. Other than the Enterprise and the Yamato, I don't know of any other ships that have letters after their registry (including the Defiant).

Meanwhile, I was flipping through Memory-Alpha to reacquaint myself with the time period, and I was shocked to realize that there is essentially zero time lapse after the events of ST:VI and the events of ST: Generations. Both take place in 2293, so it would stand to reason that the Enterpise-A was indeed decomissioned that year to make way for the Enterprise-B.
That's pretty much my take on it too.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 04:26 PM   #68
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Captain Mike wrote: View Post
I just don't understand some peoples idea that Starfleet is "punishing" Kirk by giving him and his crew another Constitution refit. Hell in TVH, most everybody that was on the shuttle in Spacedock were unsure of their fate. Even McCoy stated: "The bureaucratic mentality is the only constant in the universe, we'll get a freighter.".
Also as stated in GENERATIONS, Kirk and the crew were distinguished as "living legends", and that was a short span of time between TVH and then. so why this notion of "punishment" eludes me.

I'm totally with you. Until I read posts on this thread, the idea of them being fobbed off or punished never ever dawned on me in 26 years of seeing this movie on and off.

STIV is a feelgood movie and my take on the end was that we were seeing the crew getting their reward, that we were going to see them back out having adventures in the flagship where they belong. To my mind, the idea that they're being given a hand-me-down as a PR exercise is totally at odds with the cheerful, almost triumphant ending of the movie. It's like 'here's the bad news Kirk, you're being demoted. Now here's the good news....' The 'demotion' is really a blessing in disguise, returning him to his rightful destiny.

I never got the idea that the ship he was given was a second piece of bad news. His last line is 'We've come home', for goodness' sake.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 08:36 PM   #69
ssosmcin
Rear Admiral
 
ssosmcin's Avatar
 
Location: ssosmcin
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

I also don't get this "wanted to get Kirk out of their hair" attitude. He was never that much of a pain in the ass and the only big thing he did to piss them off was in Star Trek III. Otherwise, he was a hero of the Federation, over and over. In Star Trek IV they cleared him and gave him back the life he craved with the crew he wanted (I imagine a few of them would have retired if not assigned back on the Enterprise). That's no punishment.

I think a lot of this attitude comes from the DC comics series of the time. They kinda made Kirk something of a thorn in the side of the brass, but the films didn't.

The Enterprise A was a dud because it was "funny." Or, because they slapped the ship together so fast they didn't get anything right. Was an old ship? If it was, the controls were more advanced than before, with the touch screens and stuff.
__________________
"Tranya is people!"
ssosmcin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 09:56 PM   #70
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Saint Louis (aka Defiance)
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

ssosmcin wrote: View Post
I also don't get this "wanted to get Kirk out of their hair" attitude. He was never that much of a pain in the ass and the only big thing he did to piss them off was in Star Trek III. Otherwise, he was a hero of the Federation, over and over. In Star Trek IV they cleared him and gave him back the life he craved with the crew he wanted (I imagine a few of them would have retired if not assigned back on the Enterprise). That's no punishment.

I think a lot of this attitude comes from the DC comics series of the time. They kinda made Kirk something of a thorn in the side of the brass, but the films didn't.
The DC comics were really reflecting the way Kirk was being depicted in the films. But more than anything, it seemed as if whenever there was something big going on, Kirk was involved in it somehow.
The Enterprise A was a dud because it was "funny." Or, because they slapped the ship together so fast they didn't get anything right. Was an old ship? If it was, the controls were more advanced than before, with the touch screens and stuff.
A recently refitted ship would explain that. But then some old-fashioned controls were back in place for the Enterprise-A in Star Trek VI, go fig.
__________________
"Everybody wants to rule the world..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 5 2012, 10:54 PM   #71
MacLeod
Admiral
 
Location: Great Britain
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

It was a win win situation for the Federation.

1.>From a diplomatic point of the view, they could say to the Klingons we punished Kirk for voilating orders.

2.>From a Federation PR point of view they have the person who saved Earth not once but twice in command of a starship

3.>Kirk was happy he was back where he wanted to be in the centre seat. Scotty was Chief Engineer of the Enterrpise again.

Every one was a winner, except maybe the Klingons who might not have liked the punishment. After all they had no legal leg to stand on so to speak. Their vessel did voilate the Neutral Zone (a possible act of war), their vessel did fire upon a Federation vessel (another act of war), it's crew did murder Federation citizens etc...

Though the Klingon Ambassador did have to eat his words a few years later. "There can be no peace as long as Kirk lives"
__________________
On the continent of wild endeavour in the mountains of solace and solitude there stood the citadel of the time lords, the oldest and most mighty race in the universe looking down on the galaxies below sworn never to interfere only to watch.
MacLeod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7 2012, 03:49 PM   #72
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Their vessel did voilate the Neutral Zone (a possible act of war)
One wonders how this one works. If Genesis / Mutara was neutral space, and Klingons were spotted there, and it stood to reason that in order to get there they had to take their armed vessel through the Klingon Neutral Zone and thus violate its neutrality, but nobody saw the Klingons at the KNZ... Would the Feds have a legal leg to stand on?

their vessel did fire upon a Federation vessel (another act of war)
Depending on what Maltz confessed to, the Klingons could claim that all they did was in self-defense. Kirk verifiably fired first, after all, and Saavik didn't see what happened to the Grissom.

it's crew did murder Federation citizens etc...
Saavik did see that one stabbing. Then again, Kirk killed two Klingons on the planet, and blew up plenty more in apparent violation of rules of war (using surrender as a ploy is definitely something that gives the opponent moral and arguably legal justification for forgetting about the rules, too).

Not that Klingon law would have a priori objections to killings of that sort. But we're not talking about law as a neutral entity, but specifically as a tool of politics.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 7 2012, 05:44 PM   #73
BillJ
Admiral
 
BillJ's Avatar
 
Location: Covington, Ky.
View BillJ's Twitter Profile
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

You're really overreaching Timo.
__________________
"I had no idea you were so... formidable. " - Anan 7 to James T. Kirk, A Taste of Armageddon
BillJ is online now   Reply With Quote
Old June 7 2012, 06:34 PM   #74
CoveTom
Rear Admiral
 
Location: CoveTom
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

Well, real world, I'm sure the producers intended it to be a new ship. But they went with the refit Constitution because (a) it would be instantly recognizable as the Enterprise to the moviegoing public and (b) they didn't have to spend a boatload of cash to build a new model for what was a two minute scene at the end of a movie. Therefore, since I assume that's what was intended real world, I prefer to think that in-universe it is a brand new ship as well.
CoveTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 7 2012, 11:47 PM   #75
Santaman
Rear Admiral
 
Santaman's Avatar
 
Location: A little while in the past.
Re: The operational status of NCC 1701-A...?

I think the Ent A was a prototype vessel, kinda like spaceshuttle Enterprise, they just had to fit the missing pieces to make it into a real operational starship, also might explain why its partially more modern and partially a step back from the TMP refit .
__________________
"Sword is personal, brings slicing to a man, you getta that personal feedback, nuclear weapons?.. Meh, goes off big bang and you don't get any feeling.."
Santaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.