|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1531 | |
|
Commander
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
-Jamman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1532 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
One thing that bothered me this episode (and in a lot of zombie fiction) is that the characters don't just drive over the herd with their cars/trucks. Even if it doesn't brain the zombies, it should at least break some limbs. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1533 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
Hopefully they'll do a better job in the third season, and not use a static location as an excuse for keeping the plot static until the last few episodes.
__________________
"Does the cold of deep space make your nipples go pointy Bowie? Do you use your pointy nipples as telescopic antennae to transmit data back to Earth? I bet you do, you freaky old bastard you" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1534 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: I'm at WKRP
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while... |
|
|
|
|
#1535 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Sac, Ca
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
It didn't help that things seemed a little TOO calm and serene there. The longer and longer they stayed, the more it strained credibility that they weren't discovered by a zombie hoard. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1536 | ||
|
Captain
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
btw, why aren't they finding cb radios and trying to contact other survivors that way now? |
||
|
|
|
|
#1537 | ||
|
Commodore
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
But anyway, the bite was clearly the reason his condition worsened to the point of death (and imminent zombification).
__________________
Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt. These are the tears of things, and the stuff of our mortality cuts us to the heart. An Informed Approximation |
||
|
|
|
|
#1538 | |
|
Commodore
Location: Lincoln, NE
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
Just look at the horrible way the whole Randall thing was handled. They wasted gas, ammo, medical supplies, and created a big internal division in the group for what? So Rick could decided to kill Randall after saving him then back off and go with the original catch-and-release scheme a second time? And do we even need to talk about all the time they wasted doing absolutely nothing on the farm? Why did they wait for Dale to die before they started trying to pro-actively protect themselves? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1539 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
So basically if you took Breaking Bad and Mad Men and added them together their total viewership would still be on average close to 2.5m/3m viewers less per episode than Walking Dead averages... yet somehow the budget gets cut before the season starts. It's like if Alabama cuts the budget on its football team(which brings in all the money) in order to give more money to the women's lacrosse team. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1540 | |
|
Commander
Location: UK
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
TWD is based on the traditional zombie lore inspired by the George Romero movies. In which anyone who dies for any reason reanimates as a zombie. Being bitten causes death... presumably due to the amount of bacteria etc... This death leads to reanimation as a zombie. Other than that simple insignificant background rule this is a character based drama. Special immunity, or zombies turning into Lickers or Rick turning into a Nemesis complete with mini gun arms will not benefit the story in any way. The show could be set in any post apocalyptic world and wouldn't be hugely different week to week, pretty easy to replace the zombies with raiders etc and your story doesn't massively change. They've decided to do this story in the Romero zombie universe, they've even gone to the extent of ensuring that no zombie moves faster than the fastest zombie in NotLD, as they love and respect this fictional universe- there is literally no incentive to start changing it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1541 |
|
Commodore
Location: to your immediate right
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
|
|
|
|
|
#1542 | |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Sac, Ca
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
Although apparently from the lastest interview in EW, the show's worldview is going to be expanded quite a bit in the third season... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1543 |
|
Commander
Location: UK
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1544 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: fresno, ca, us
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
If the zombie herd was heading out of the city, why wouldn't our group want to be BEHIND them? Staying in front of them means the herd is always chasing them; being behind the herd should give some rest. And shouldn't the herd be decomposing more and more? I can understand that there could be new zombies as people die, or evidently, the zombie-flu takes them over (a la Shane). |
|
|
|
|
#1545 |
|
Commodore
|
Re: The Walking Dead Season 2 Discussion *Spoilers*
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| frank darabont, horror, robert kirkman, the walking dead, zombies |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.



















