RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 145,295
Posts: 5,720,418
Members: 25,764
Currently online: 431
Newest member: RedShirtGuy797

TrekToday headlines

Where No Garden Gnome Has Gone Before
By: T'Bonz on May 22

Scotland Yard Trekkie Fear
By: T'Bonz on May 22

Koenig Joins Captain Pike Project
By: T'Bonz on May 22

Retro Review: Ex Post Facto
By: Michelle on May 22

Smallwood: Creating The Xindi
By: T'Bonz on May 21

Greenwood Joins O.J. Simpson Series
By: T'Bonz on May 21

The USS Enterprise Building
By: T'Bonz on May 20

Wheaton Guests On Mission Log Podcast
By: T'Bonz on May 20

Pegg: Star Trek 3 Less Trek-Y
By: T'Bonz on May 20

Two Trek Book Covers Unveiled
By: T'Bonz on May 19


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Misc. Star Trek > Future of Trek

Future of Trek Discussion of future Trek projects.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 11 2011, 06:03 PM   #31
C.E. Evans
Vice Admiral
 
C.E. Evans's Avatar
 
Location: Ferguson, Missouri, USA
Re: Embrace or Reject?: "Space as treated like an ocean.

Kegg wrote: View Post
C.E. Evans wrote: View Post
No, you've missed the point because I'm talking more about starships than I am about submarines.
You're using an analogy that makes no sense, however. If two starships can detect each other, they cannot have a fight in any way comparable to a submarine engagement.

It's that simple.
Hardly, because I don't even think we're talking about the same subject.
__________________
"Don't sweat the small stuff--it makes you small-minded..."
C.E. Evans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 12 2011, 08:23 PM   #32
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: Embrace or Reject?: "Space as treated like an ocean.

Time for someone to restate the point.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 13 2011, 06:48 PM   #33
The Dominion
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Gamma Quadrant
Re: Embrace or Reject?: "Space as treated like an ocean.

Well I can see the analogy, but I would like to see a new modern Trek taking a more realistic approach to space where it could. In accordance to what we know about it currently.
__________________
A witty saying proves nothing. ~ Voltaire
The Dominion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 16 2011, 11:46 PM   #34
Herkimer Jitty
Rear Admiral
 
Herkimer Jitty's Avatar
 
Location: Dayglow, New California Republic
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Herkimer Jitty
Re: Embrace or Reject?: "Space as treated like an ocean.

No, we shouldn't treat space as an ocean.

We should treat it as a sea.

There is a difference.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1965½, 1966-1969, Jan. 21-23 1972, 1979-2001, 2003-2005, 2009-?
Herkimer Jitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 23 2011, 09:13 AM   #35
The Castellan
Commodore
 
The Castellan's Avatar
 
Location: The Plains of Cydonia
Send a message via Yahoo to The Castellan
Re: Embrace or Reject?: "Space as treated like an ocean.

I just see space as a big, wide sky.
The Castellan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
enterprise, ocean, science., space, starship

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.