|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Trek Gaming Program Complete - Enter When Ready. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2776 |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Elite STF channels have started forming level 1 private SB24 swarms that cut down those klingon ships as if they were butter. 1440 dilithium in 90 seconds tops, no cooldown. So Cryptic wanted players to have more dilithium, they've got it. ![]() ![]()
__________________
USS Sentinel, Luna Class (STO) Last edited by intrinsical; November 15 2012 at 08:24 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2777 |
|
Captain
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
TREKBBS Armada handle: Doc Lee@Rocketeer_7 (The original Korean Trill), DOFF system Jho'dig - FED Engr in Excelsior Refit / Carter - FED Tac / Kaylee - FED Engr Jasmine - KDF Sci/Doc / Joachim - KDF Engr |
|
|
|
|
#2778 |
|
Admiral
Location: Rhode Island, USA
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Again, it's not that the new required farming is hard, it's that it's mind-numbingly boring. And I have no interest in playing it... As for the New Romulus stuff? Kinda symptomatic of Cryptic's overall issue: visually, it's very nice. They've created a nice little adventure planet setting. But they didn't create any adventures to HAVE on the planet. Scan 5 of x, encourage Y number of workers to stop being lazy shits, go over there and click "f" 5 times. It's just grindy little mini-games, but no reason behind it, or much fun in it. They like to play with the systems, but have abandoned the gameplay portion, the reason to DO the things. It's just another new currency, grindfests to collect it 10 marks at a time, and then a massive sink to drop them in. Despite an obvious amount of work that went into it, I just don't see the point. Ran around for a couple hours there, and pretty much already had enough. They did the same thing with Bajor. Created a great map, beautiful scenery. And then just put a couple tiny grind games in there and abandoned it. When was the last time you were there? They spend all this time on it, and it's wasted because they can't figure out how to make them ENGAGING. Just nice scenery or 'click f 5 times' missions. They also can't seem to just TWEAK anything. They go in for wholesale changes to the entire system. If they weren't happy with DIL rates, could have tried adjusting things, more here, little less there, see what happens. Instead, they nuke the most popular ones (to the point where the backlash already has them reversing course), attach the big rewards to garbage missions that no one plays anymore (not because of the rewards, but because they are boring, awful missions), nuke several currencies (again), create whole new ones (screwing everyone yet again on the conversion rates), etc. Can't even make sense of half of what they changed. Even little stuff, like visual items like the PVE queue screen. Awful, muddled mess. What was wrong with that one? Or knowing roughly how many people were in the queue, whether it was worth signing up in the first place.
__________________
Perhaps, if I am very lucky, the feeble efforts of my lifetime will someday be noticed and maybe, in some small way, they will be acknowledged as the greatest works of genius ever created by man. ~Jack Handey STO: @JScout33 Last edited by Scout101; November 15 2012 at 01:05 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#2779 |
|
Professional Enabler
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
The most horrible suffering one can bring upon another person in dire need, is that of indifference. With love, you try to uplift their life. With hatred, you seek to end that life. With indifference, however, you seek merely to render it inconsequential. |
|
|
|
|
#2780 | |
|
Fleet Captain
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Strangely, Champs Online seem to have a much stronger and more cohesive storyline with actual adventures and such.
__________________
USS Sentinel, Luna Class (STO) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2781 |
|
Captain
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Bajor was a lost opportunity. I haven't been back since the FEs. |
|
|
|
|
#2782 |
|
Professional Enabler
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
The most horrible suffering one can bring upon another person in dire need, is that of indifference. With love, you try to uplift their life. With hatred, you seek to end that life. With indifference, however, you seek merely to render it inconsequential. |
|
|
|
|
#2783 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
There is almost no amount of tanking that will get you out of this alive. So you go boom, respawn and start picking them off from the rim again. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2784 |
|
Captain
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
On another note - I respec'd all my VA/LG characters. Previously, most of their skills were just added willy-nilly as I earned enough points to advance them. So now my engineers are better focused tanks, plus they have 3 tiers in threat so they get a little more attention. My tac is now better focused on tactical stuff and has 1 tier in threat. My sci officers are better focused on sci/med stuff and have 0 in threat. If you think that I've made any mistakes, let me know as I have respec tokens to burn. Some characters have as many as 12 respec tokens. . |
|
|
|
|
#2785 |
|
Rear Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2786 |
|
Admiral
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
"What do you hear, Starbuck?" "Nothing but the rain, sir." "Then grab your gun and bring in the cat." |
|
|
|
|
#2787 |
|
Vice Admiral
Location: Star Trekkin Across the universe.
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
Also I had a very good elite infected space run today, got the optional and as a result have enough omega marks to get a decent start on the reputation stuff. |
|
|
|
|
#2788 |
|
Professional Enabler
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
The most horrible suffering one can bring upon another person in dire need, is that of indifference. With love, you try to uplift their life. With hatred, you seek to end that life. With indifference, however, you seek merely to render it inconsequential. |
|
|
|
|
#2789 | |
|
Captain
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
__________________
TREKBBS Armada handle: Doc Lee@Rocketeer_7 (The original Korean Trill), DOFF system Jho'dig - FED Engr in Excelsior Refit / Carter - FED Tac / Kaylee - FED Engr Jasmine - KDF Sci/Doc / Joachim - KDF Engr |
|
|
|
|
|
#2790 | |
|
Captain
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
Re: Star Trek Online Discussion Thread (now free to play!)
I didn't notice that myself, but the two characters I've tested it with are tanks. I make it a priority to keep the hull healed, even to the extent of ignoring the shields. My philosophy is that it doesn't matter what happens to my ship as long as I have "hull" I'm still in the fight. I did notice a sharp decrease in dilithium reward and a cool-down on the every PVE mission I tried. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| mmorpg, onlne, star trek online, sto |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:30 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.






















