RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,342
Posts: 5,502,317
Members: 25,118
Currently online: 740
Newest member: Ashanti

TrekToday headlines

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11

Frakes: Sign Me Up!
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old February 22 2012, 10:22 PM   #91
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 10:23 PM   #92
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Shazam! wrote: View Post
No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
Terminator 2.
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 10:28 PM   #93
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Shazam! wrote: View Post
No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
The Star Wars series?
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 10:45 PM   #94
JarodRussell
Vice Admiral
 
JarodRussell's Avatar
 
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post
No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
The Star Wars series?
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
JarodRussell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 11:22 PM   #95
Base_Delta_Zero
Commodore
 
Base_Delta_Zero's Avatar
 
Location: Maine
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Shazam! wrote: View Post
No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
Die Hard 1 had his kids in it, and Lucy in the 4th was great.
Base_Delta_Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 11:27 PM   #96
Shazam!
Rear Admiral
 
Shazam!'s Avatar
 
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Base_Delta_Zero wrote: View Post
Lucy in the 4th was great.
This is incorrect.
Shazam! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 11:29 PM   #97
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Shazam! wrote: View Post
Base_Delta_Zero wrote: View Post
Lucy in the 4th was great.
This is incorrect.
I have to disagree, I liked Lucy's role in the film.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 11:34 PM   #98
Temis the Vorta
Fleet Admiral
 
Temis the Vorta's Avatar
 
Location: Tatoinne
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

JarodRussell wrote: View Post
Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Shazam! wrote: View Post
No movie franchise has ever benefited from the introduction of the protagonist's offspring.
The Star Wars series?
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr...
Vader is not the protagonist. I don't care how many times Lucas says he is.
Temis the Vorta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 22 2012, 11:35 PM   #99
nvek86
Commander
 
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Base_Delta_Zero wrote: View Post
Die Hard 1 had his kids in it, and Lucy in the 4th was great.
Yeah, why don't they use her in the 5th?
__________________
The Life of Alexander T. - A Blog Novel
http://thelifeofalexandert.blogspot.com
nvek86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 12:08 AM   #100
The Cubed Ho
Fleet Captain
 
The Cubed Ho's Avatar
 
Location: Foxhot
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Mary Elizabeth Winstead was last seen in THE THING prequel from 2011, yet visually and vocally she seemed altogether different from her roles in DH4, DEATH PROOF and SKY HIGH. I'm not sure why....

If DH5 gets released on Valentine's Day, is this to indicate John McClane Jr. will try to attract viewers no longer fascinated with Bruce Willis?

I think DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE! DIE HARDEST would've been a zippier title myself.
The Cubed Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 01:08 AM   #101
Chemahkuu
Vice Admiral
 
Chemahkuu's Avatar
 
Location: United Kingdom
Send a message via Yahoo to Chemahkuu
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Die Hard V: Why Can't I Just Die?

The fourth was a nice ending to the franchise, Lucy was great. I wasn't really looking forward to the 5th as it was, every new bit of news just makes it sound worse.
Chemahkuu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 02:44 AM   #102
The Cubed Ho
Fleet Captain
 
The Cubed Ho's Avatar
 
Location: Foxhot
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Unlike the ALIEN franchise, I think DIE HARD still kept its edge despite the fourth's PG-13 rating.

But to complete the circle I want Paulina the maid to co-star with Willis in DH6.
The Cubed Ho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 09:57 AM   #103
St. William Of Levittown
Vice Admiral
 
St. William Of Levittown's Avatar
 
Location: Rush Limborg is prepping for Christmas on The EIB Network
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

Captaindemotion wrote: View Post
Oh dear.

I hate to be so negative, but the first Die Hard movie is, for my money, the best action movie ever. And I love the next two in the series, even the much maligned Die Hard 2: Die Harder.

Die Hard 4.0 had its moments, but was let down by Les Wiseman's humdrum direction (sir, you're no John McTiernan) and the fact that someone took soap and water to John McClane's previously gloriously filthy potty mouth.

Those of us hoping for a return to form are unlikely to be heartened by the fact that DH5 will apparently pair up journeyman director John Moore (who so far has given us forgettable remakes of The Omen and Flight of the Phoenix, as well as May Payne and Behind Enemy Lines) with writer Skip Woods, of Wolverine and The A-Team fame (or forgettability).

Now, maybe this will be the movie where the two of them prove the naysayers wrong... but I'm not optimistic. Anyone care to change my mind?

http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=81665

http://www.deadline.com/2011/08/john...ll-helm-red-2/

After a long search process, 20th Century Fox and Bruce Willis have just chosen John Moore to direct Die Hard 5. The film will shoot in Russia

As for Die Hard 5, Moore is in final negotiations and was in the running through the entire search as Fox tried to find a filmmaker that pleased Willis and the studio execs that have to shoot this movie in Russia and bring it in on a budget and a tight schedule. Fox has been looking for a new director since Noam Murro left the picture after he got the job [COLOR=#0568f9]helming[/COLOR] 300: Battle Of Artemisia for Warner Bros. The studio started with a wish list of directors to helm the script by Skip Woods that included Joe Cornish (who directed Attack the Block), Fast Five helmer Justin Lin, Drive director Nicolas Winding Refn, and Moore. More recently, I’d heard Fox had conversations with helmers that included Gary Fleder, Paul McGuigan and 1408 helmer Mikael Hafstrom.

Moore didn’t have to necessarily sell Fox; the studio loves the Irishman. But he did have to convince Willis, who has been very hands-on in the selection of Die Hard directors. Moore and Willis had long meetings and Willis was swayed by Moore’s love for the John McClane character, and his grasp of how to shoot practical, non-CGI-heavy action scenes that have been a hallmark of the Die Hard series.
Well, hey--to be fair, say what you will about Wolverine having a weak plot--the film was FUN. It was filled with the kind of riveting, tough-guy, witty dialogue that John McClain would revel in. The characterization was excellent, and so on.

(But then, I'm not a faithful reader of the comics...so I wasn't nitpicking the film for those kinds of errors....)
__________________
"The saying implies but does not name the effective agency of its supposed utopia.... 'Needs and abilities' are, of course, subjective. So the operative statement may be reduced to 'the State shall take, the State shall give'."
--David Mamet
St. William Of Levittown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 11:42 AM   #104
Tosk
Rear Admiral
 
Tosk's Avatar
 
Location: On the run.
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

If Argyle isn't his sidekick in the next one, I'm not interested.
Tosk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old February 23 2012, 12:42 PM   #105
Starkers
Admiral
 
Starkers's Avatar
 
Location: Behind enemy lines
Re: Die Hard V - Not Looking Good...

I'm hoping Hans had another brother...

And whatever happened to the teddy bear!
Starkers is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
die hard

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.