RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 149,551
Posts: 5,945,689
Members: 26,484
Currently online: 347
Newest member: killer6618

TrekToday headlines

STO Community Supports Chase Masterson Charity
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Greenwood To Receive Award
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Shatner In Hallmark Christmas Movie
By: T'Bonz on Nov 26

Abrams On Star Trek Into Darkness Flaws
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Star Trek Beyond In IMAX
By: T'Bonz on Nov 25

Red Shirt Diaries: The Return of The Archons
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Abrams Loves His Lens Flares
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Elba Star Trek Beyond Character Speculation
By: T'Bonz on Nov 23

Retro Review: Meld
By: Michelle Erica Green on Nov 20

Borg Cube Paper Lantern
By: T'Bonz on Nov 20

Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.

Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > TV & Media

TV & Media Non-Trek television, movies, books, music, etc.

View Poll Results: Grade the movie...
Excellent 0 0%
Above Average 1 25.00%
Average 2 50.00%
Below Average 0 0%
Poor 1 25.00%
Voters: 4. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
Old July 21 2011, 04:03 PM   #1
Agent Richard07
Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

Welcome to the grading & discussion thread for Friends With Benefits.

"A young female headhunter (Mila Kunis) in New York convinces a potential
recruit (Justin Timberlake) to leave his job in San Francisco behind and accept
a job in the big apple. Despite an attraction to each other, both realize they’re
everything they’ve been running from in a relationship and decide to become
friends….with benefits. It’s the perfect arrangement–until they realize there’s
no such thing as no strings attached." - Moviehole

Official Website | Trailer | IMDb Page | Wikipedia Entry
Box Office Mojo Page | Rotten Tomatoes Page
Metacritic Page | Roger Ebert's Review
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21 2011, 04:34 PM   #2
Locutus of Bored
My Force Isn't Awake Yet
Locutus of Bored's Avatar
Location: Huntington Beach, California
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

I thought Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher both gave weak performances and the film fell flat in the humor department.

- There are stories about what happened.
- It's true. All of it. TNZ, Hulk, ModMan. They're real.
Locutus of Bored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 21 2011, 04:42 PM   #3
Agent Richard07
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

This one looks raunchier than No Strings Attached, so I'm looking forward to it.
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 22 2011, 11:33 PM   #4
Agent Richard07
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

I just saw this and since you can probably guess where the story goes, I'll just talk about the other things needed to carry the movie and make it interesting, like good characters and good delivery. Does it have that? I'd say so. Mila Kunis and Justin Timberlake deliver as good looking 20-somethings who are getting over relationships and don't want anything serious when they first meet and hit it off. As actors, they both handle the relationship stuff, the sex talk and the action in bed quite well. It almost came off like they were ad-libbing some of their dialog. As if the director just set the camera on them and let them have at it in a lot of scenes. The two characters also make fun of romantic comedies and their various clichés, and in a number of cases, the movie actually goes with those clichés just so that it, or the two leads can poke fun at them. How does this movie compare to No Strings Attached? I'd say they're about the same, but this movie has more of that seemingly ad-libbed dialog I mentioned. And although there's nudity and more frankness in the sex talk and sex scenes, there isn't enough to make this the much raunchier movie I thought it would be. The raciest stuff is in the trailer. In the end, the movies are a lot more similar than I thought. I guess I'll say I prefer No Strings just because I'm a fan of Natalie Portman.
Agent Richard07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 23 2011, 05:26 AM   #5
Fleet Admiral
Admiral_Young's Avatar
Location: Gotham
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

I was looking forward to "Friends With Benefits" over "No Strings Attached" so I'll probably see this eventually. Not for a couple of weeks though.
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is online now   Reply With Quote
Old July 27 2011, 07:22 AM   #6
Fleet Captain
AliciaD496's Avatar
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
View AliciaD496's Twitter Profile
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

Saw it at a matinee last weekend...and while there are superficial similarities Friends with Benefits is a different movie from No Strings Attached. In fact I'd probably compare FWB more to Going the Distance. No Strings Attached they'd had a previous on-and-off again acquaintanceship for years before finding each other again...FWB they were strangers at the beginning of the movie. In FWB they chose to have their relationship more out of the fact that she was the only person he knew in NYC initially and she needed a way to cope, while in No Strings he was coping with a breakup while's hard to really tell what her motivation was honestly other than the physical pleasure. Like I said...some similarities.

Honestly? The characters in FWB were more likable and more relatable, they coped with real problems that real people have (bad break ups, ill parent, bad parent relationship) in a relatively realistic manner. No Strings Attached was a the wall in that manner. The supporting cast in both was....alright, No Strings Attached only slightly better but Woody Harrelson stood out for the most in either movie. Anyway...that's my review.
AliciaD496 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 31 2011, 02:18 AM   #7
Vice Admiral
FPAlpha's Avatar
Location: Mannheim, Germany
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

In short.. awesome first half, standard (i.e. mostly boring and formulaic) romantic comedy for the rest of the movie.

It had some awesome scenes in the beginning, especially the raunchy sex scenes with moments everyone who's got some experience in that area will recognize and laugh about. Sadly this funniness instantly evaporates when they inevitably fall for each other (come on.. that's not a spoiler.. it's a romantic comedy! ) and they go through the motions before ending up with each other.

It's much like The Proposal with Sandra Bullock and Ryan Reynolds.. Sandra Bullock is brilliant as the bitch boss and Reynolds as the assistant who hates her with a passion but once they start seeing each other as persons with qualities the movie turns dull.

FwB is ok for a video rental Sunday afternoon when you've exhausted your DVD rack and are not in the mood for some violence or other stuff.
"Chewie, we're home.."
FPAlpha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 1 2011, 07:52 AM   #8
Guy Gardener
Fleet Admiral
Guy Gardener's Avatar
Location: In the lap of squalor I assure you.
Re: Friends With Benefits - Grading & Discussion

It wasn't that bad, especially if you compare it to what Rashida and Jason were doing in the movie inside the movie.
"Glitter is the herpes of arts and craft."

Troy Yingst. My Life as Liz
Guy Gardener is offline   Reply With Quote


casual sex, justin timberlake, mila kunis, relationships, sex

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.