RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 140,223
Posts: 5,438,023
Members: 24,957
Currently online: 491
Newest member: zanejc

TrekToday headlines

Cumberbatch In Wax
By: T'Bonz on Oct 24

Trek Screenwriter Washington D.C. Appearance
By: T'Bonz on Oct 23

Two Official Starships Collection Ships
By: T'Bonz on Oct 22

Pine In New Skit
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

Stewart In Holiday Film
By: T'Bonz on Oct 21

The Red Shirt Diaries #8
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

IDW Publishing January Comics
By: T'Bonz on Oct 20

Retro Review: Chrysalis
By: Michelle on Oct 18

The Next Generation Season Seven Blu-ray Details
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17

CBS Launches Streaming Service
By: T'Bonz on Oct 17


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How would you grade Green Lantern?
A+ 5 3.52%
A 7 4.93%
A- 11 7.75%
B+ 20 14.08%
B 18 12.68%
B- 23 16.20%
C+ 10 7.04%
C 15 10.56%
C- 13 9.15%
D+ 4 2.82%
D 3 2.11%
D- 3 2.11%
F 10 7.04%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 17 2011, 11:29 PM   #46
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

That's what I thought his name was but for some reason I kept telling myself that was the name of some lame comedian who's special only airs on HBO at 2 AM.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:35 PM   #47
DarKush
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Checked out the film today. I thought it was decent. It was better than I expected, but I'm not sure that's saying much. The film wasn't as jokey as the first trailer suggested and Ryan Reynolds (while still not my favorite choice) did well enough in the role. Same with all of the actors, though some are not given much to do.

I never liked the look of the characters or designs from the trailers and other promotional work. It looks slightly better on film for me, but I still wasn't super impressed. Parallax plays better in the film, once his movie origin is explained, though I still don't care for his look. Stay after the credits, there's a tease for a potential sequel.

The film moved at a brisk pace, and it covered a lot of territory, but perhaps it breezed by so much stuff, the film didn't feel weighty enough for me. I never got that sense of dread that should've been permeating the film as Parallax steadily made his way across the galaxy. Some critics have derided the climax. I didn't think it was as much of a letdown as some other critics do, however, the CGI was shaky in spots.

If there is a sequel I would watch it, but I didn't leave the theater wishing there would be another sequel. Only Mark Strong's Sinestro left me wanting to see more of him. I don't think the film delivered on giving us enough memorable moments to make us want another sequel.


Spoilers below....

I think because they covered so much territory so quickly, perhaps I missed some things or got confused, but early on the narrator (Tomar Re I think) tells about Abin Sur stopping Parallax, but after he escapes Ryut, it seems like the Guardians or Sinestro at least don't know who he is. It confused me. I also don't get why a being as powerful as Parallax wasn't in a more secure location. I summed it up to maybe not wanting guards to be tempted by Parallax. But why not have automated systems to make sure he is imprisoned or to keep people from haplessly coming across his cell?

I also didn't get why Parallax shifted from destroying Oa to going after Earth. What's the big deal about destroying the man who succeeded the man who captured you if you've already killed the dude that captured you? Parallax stated that once he consumed Earth he would have enough power to take on the Guardians, but there was no indication that he needed Earth at all before, and it felt like they just threw that in to shore up his other justification and to center the action on Earth. Plus, previously Parallax had just cut through Sinestro's hand-picked elite squad like it wasn't nothing. It didn't appear that he needed Earth to take out Oa to me. It goes back to the tired Earth in peril plot that too many sci-fi movies rely on. It's like audiences will only care if Earth is threatened. If the film had actually spent more time on Oa and fleshed out the Corps better I think that would've made non-GL affiliated audience care enough about Oa to have that be the center of the film.

Perhaps it was for cost reasons, or to establish Hal as a badass by having him take on Parallax alone, but that didn't make sense to me either. His training is far too brief before he quits the Corps and returns to Earth; didn't make sense to me because the Guardians let him keep the ring and the lantern. Seems like they would've taken it from him or he would've given it back to them. That would've made his decision to quit actually feel real. I also didn't care for Hal going to Oa just in time to stop them from unleashing Sinestro with the yellow ring on Parallax's ass to essentially tell them that he's going to take on Parallax alone.

If you're going to take on Parallax alone, why ask for their permission or go tell them, just do it. Then again, I wonder why not just ask for their help? Why not demand it? And why wouldn't the Guardians override him? Seeing the Corps fight together to save Earth or Oa could've been an oh shit moment this film really needed.

As for Parallax overall I got mixed feelings. I sort of liked how they combined his story with Krona's IMO and I liked how he ripped the fear and people's souls right out, but I didn't care for the dirty cloud look. I don't think Parallax was the best villain to start out the franchise with. He's the type of villain you work up for. I wish they had followed Secret Origins more and had Atrocitus be the one who killed Abin Sur and have Hal and Sinestro work together to hunt him down.

As for others:
-Blake Lively did okay as the love interest Carol Ferris. I thought she and Reynolds had nice chemistry. Unfortunately I was looking at her character through the prism of what she is to become and I wished they had picked an actress with more edge. I can't see Lively being a credible villain, though she might look okay in the Star Sapphire bikini.

-Peter Sarsgaard as Hector Hammond. I thought he was creepy enough, though sometimes his delivery was weird. I didn't care for his makeup, but he turned out to be a decent villain.

-Angela Bassett as Amanda Waller. They didn't give her much to do, but her backstory does get told courtesy of Hammond's telepathy. Her fate was left unknown, but hopefully they will bring her back. And hopefully she'll get to be more villainous and calling the shots.

-Tim Robbins was okay as Hammond's disappointed father.

-The Corps: There wasn't much focus on them. Kilowog's one training scene was pretty much the long and short of his appearance in the film. Tomar Re didn't get much face time either. Sinestro got a little more. Regarding Sinestro, the after credits tease with him becoming a Yellow Lantern didn't make much sense since Parallax had already been defeated, and the reason for taking on the yellow ring was to combat him. I wish they had went more with the comics story of his fall. That could've been a good follow up film. But it appears that me might come out the gate evil in a second film.

-It was never explained why Abin Sur needed a starship. I thought I read somewhere that they would address that.

Hovering between B- and C+

Last edited by DarKush; June 17 2011 at 11:54 PM.
DarKush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:36 PM   #48
Kegg
Rear Admiral
 
Kegg's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland.
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

A pretty dire prognostication for this flick, nay, the costumed-punchy-people genre, in the Irish Times.

Tara Brady observes (from her review):
But as Hollywood rushes in to resurrect every soul who ever donned a cape or dispatched a villain mid-monologue, Supehero Fatigue Syndrome has set in. X-Men: First Class, despite excellent notices, has performed well below expectations, Thor failed to make a thunderous boom and predicted tallies for the rest of this summer's slate - Captain America: The First Avenger, etc - are hastily being revised downwards.

If the rapidly declining genre is starting to look awfully like the disaster flick at the end of the 1970s, then Green Lantern is the Airport '79 of superhero pictures.
__________________
'Spock is always right, even when he's wrong. It's the tone of voice, the supernatural reasonability; this is not a man like us; this is a god.'
- Philip K. Dick

Last edited by Kegg; June 18 2011 at 01:30 AM.
Kegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:39 PM   #49
JD
Admiral
 
JD's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

I'm sooo torn on this movie. I love the GL mythos, and I want to see the movie, but the reviews are making me really nervous. I was really hoping everyone on here would love it, but the majority of you guys seem to be saying pretty much the same things as the critics, and honestly that has a much bigger impact on me than the pro critcis.
__________________
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett, Equal Rites
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:43 PM   #50
Timby
GIVE ME YOUR FACE
 
Timby's Avatar
 
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

JD wrote: View Post
I'm sooo torn on this movie. I love the GL mythos, and I want to see the movie, but the reviews are making me really nervous. I was really hoping everyone on here would love it, but the majority of you guys seem to be saying pretty much the same things as the critics, and honestly that has a much bigger impact on me than the pro critcis.
Like I said earlier, it's not offensively awful or anything, it's just kind of ... there. I do think it's a better rental, as opposed to dumping $22 on tickets.
Timby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:47 PM   #51
JD
Admiral
 
JD's Avatar
 
Location: Arizona, USA
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Yeah, and I don't like seeing movies alone, and if I go with my mom then I have pay for her, which takes me up to $30 bucks.
__________________
They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it is not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett, Equal Rites
JD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 17 2011, 11:49 PM   #52
DarKush
Rear Admiral
 
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

JD wrote: View Post
I'm sooo torn on this movie. I love the GL mythos, and I want to see the movie, but the reviews are making me really nervous. I was really hoping everyone on here would love it, but the majority of you guys seem to be saying pretty much the same things as the critics, and honestly that has a much bigger impact on me than the pro critcis.
Though I'm inclined to agree with Timby, I say go see it to make up your own mind. I don't think it's a bad film, but I don't think it left me wanting more. Not enough gee whiz moments, though some of the constructs were pretty cool.
DarKush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 12:13 AM   #53
OdoWanKenobi
Ring Slinger
 
OdoWanKenobi's Avatar
 
Location: Ysmault
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Maybe it helped to have my expectations in the gutter, but I actually kinda enjoyed it. Oh sure, there's plenty of problems. There's not enough action, and a very thin plot with some cliches and contrivances. What is there I found fun enough, though. Reynold has charisma that manages to carry the movie. The action sequences that are there are all pretty original and look great. The only weak link in the cast is Blake Lively. It's odd that, too, since she was great in The Town. Here she's just phoning it in.

The movie does focus almost entirely on Hal, instead of the Cop. If you've seen the trailers, you've pretty much seen everything that Sinestro, Kilowog, and Tomar Re do in the film. The rest of the Corp do absolutely nothing. I actually hope this gets a sequel. Now that the origin is out of the way, perhaps we can do a less Earth-bound story focusing more on the Corp as a whole. Maybe bring John Stewart and Guy Gardner into the mix?

As for the special effects, well, sometimes they work and sometimes they don't. I had reservations about the suit. On Earth it looks just fine. On Oa, it sometimes looks like Ryan Reynolds's disembodied head is floating on a CGI background. The constructs all look great, though, and are used pretty originally. I especially enjoyed Hal's solution to an out of control helicopter.

So yeah, in finale, I enjoyed it well enough despite its obvious flaws. For movies this summer that I've seen I would rank it ahead of On Stranger Tides, and behind Thor.

Oh, and don't get up to leave as soon as the credits start rolling. There's a small scene partway through that made me happy with nerd-glee. It's probably not hard to figure it out, as it's something we all wanted to see.
__________________
"In Brightest Day, in Blackest Night, no evil shall escape my sight. Let those who worship evil's might, beware my power: Green Lantern's light!"
OdoWanKenobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 12:56 AM   #54
Sagart
Fleet Captain
 
Location: Northern Ireland
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

'Green Lantern' is a very frustrating movie. There are parts of it that are good, one or two that are very good but it's laboured with a poor script and awful editing; but, for long periods, it commits what I believe to be the cardinal sin of superhero movies - it's boring. If they make a sequel, and I hope they do, make it more sci-fi, more galactic. Leave the Earth bound stuff to Batman and Spiderman!
Here’s hoping if they get a sequel it’ll be more ‘Wrath of Khan’ than ‘Motion Picture’. Think about it – Parallax=Big, floaty thing in Space=V’Ger (hard to grasp threat to humanity). Sinestro=Intelligent, charismatic, real personal threat=Khan (mano a mano with GL). Bring It On!!
__________________
Carpenter from Nazareth, seeks joiners.
Sagart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 01:10 AM   #55
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Kegg wrote: View Post
Tara Brady observes (from her review):
But as Hollywood rushes in to resurrect every soul who ever donned a cape or dispatched a villain mid-monologue, Supehero Fatigue Syndrome has set in. X-Men: First Class, despite excellent notices, has performed well below expectations, Thor failed to make a thunderous boom and prdicted tallies for the rest of this summer's slate - Captain America: The First Avenger, etc - are hastily being revised downwards.

If the rapidly declining genre is starting to look awfully like the disaster flick at the end of the 1970s, then Green Lantern is the Airport '79 of superhero pictures.
I honestly think she misses the mark on THOR "didn't make a thunderous boom", I doubt even the studio was expecting another $300m Iron Man. They knew the property was a tougher sell. The movie's made $175m and almost $435m Worldwide, hardly a squeaker. As for X-Men, it's the 5th entry and I'm sure with Singer on board they would like $200m but if it does about like Singer's first X-men movie(which it's more on track to do) that's not all bad.
Green Lantern is not perfect but Airport '79? As a comparison I find that a bit full of hyperbole.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 01:27 AM   #56
Dream
Admiral
 
Dream's Avatar
 
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

FRIDAY 5PM UPDATE: Both Green Lantern ($24M Friday, $60+M weekend) and Mr. Popper's Penguins ($6M Friday, $18M weekend) look on target right now. Refined numbers later.
http://www.deadline.com/2011/06/gree...35m-midnights/

Looks like GL is going to make about the same as Thor for its first weekend, around 60-65 million. Very good numbers.
Dream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 01:29 AM   #57
Kegg
Rear Admiral
 
Kegg's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland.
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Captain Craig wrote: View Post
I honestly think she misses the mark on THOR "didn't make a thunderous boom", I doubt even the studio was expecting another $300m Iron Man. They knew the property was a tougher sell.
In other words... it didn't make a thunderous boom?

Green Lantern is not perfect but Airport '79? As a comparison I find that a bit full of hyperbole.
Perhaps. Though it's an interesting thought that hadn't occurred to me - that the current glut of superhero films may not be a constant for the forseeable future. Obviously, even if true that wouldn't mean an end to superhero films, just as we still get disaster movies (2012, everyone), and there was a superhero film contemporaneous with the age of the disaster film I'm sure many here are familiar with.

Food for thought, anyhow.
__________________
'Spock is always right, even when he's wrong. It's the tone of voice, the supernatural reasonability; this is not a man like us; this is a god.'
- Philip K. Dick
Kegg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 02:25 AM   #58
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Okay, I've not seen GL yet, and I've not seen Airport '79 in ages but I don't see how the two movies could ever be used as a basis for comparison on one another.

And god how is that awful-looking Mr. Popper's Penguins having such an "impressive" opening?

I'll likely go see Green Lantern tomorrow night and right now I'd look to give it a B- pushing C+ which, for me, is a fairly low grade considering a movie has to be pretty bad or dull for me to put it in the C group of grading.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 03:17 AM   #59
Admiral Buzzkill
Fleet Admiral
 
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

How can a movie review make someone "nervous?" You either like a movie when you watch it or you don't.

Deadline has the Friday box office totals at 24 million dollars now, with the movie tracking toward 60 million plus for the weekend - better than X-Men, slightly behind (if the numbers hold) Thor despite being on several hundred fewer screens and no IMAX. Some folks at Warners are breathing deep sighs of relief tonight.

My favorite moment was Carol: "I've seen you naked, you think I won't recognize you because I can't see your cheekbones?" I've always wanted to see that who-are-you-kidding-with-that-mask moment in a superhero movie, and this one finally delivered.
Admiral Buzzkill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 18 2011, 03:29 AM   #60
WalkerBait
Trekker4747
 
WalkerBait's Avatar
 
Location: Kansas City
Re: Green Lantern: Grading, Review, Discuss, Tracking, Sequel?

Dennis wrote: View Post
How can a movie review make someone "nervous?" You either like a movie when you watch it or you don't.
Movie reviews reflect the opinions of people who've seen the movie. If most reviewers/people who've seen the film are giving it negative word of mouth then there's a greater chance that the movie isn't good than if it was the other way around.

If a person has a vested interest in the movie or its character(s) it could make them nervous that movie getting a large number of negative reviews isn't doing that character/franchise justice and thus the enjoyment of the movie isn't likely.
__________________
Just because it's futuristic doesn't mean it's practical.
WalkerBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
comic books, dc comics, green lantern, movie, ryan reynolds

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.