RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 141,367
Posts: 5,503,768
Members: 25,124
Currently online: 563
Newest member: traedoril

TrekToday headlines

New Abrams Project
By: T'Bonz on Dec 18

IDW Publishing March 2015 Comics
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Paramount Star Trek 3 Expectations
By: T'Bonz on Dec 17

Star Trek #39 Sneak Peek
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Star Trek 3 Potential Director Shortlist
By: T'Bonz on Dec 16

Official Starships Collection Update
By: T'Bonz on Dec 15

Retro Review: Prodigal Daughter
By: Michelle on Dec 13

Sindicate Lager To Debut In The US Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

Rumor Mill: Saldana Gives Birth
By: T'Bonz on Dec 12

New Line of Anovos Enterprise Uniforms
By: T'Bonz on Dec 11


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek Fandom > Fan Art

Fan Art Post your Trek fan art here, including hobby models and collectibles.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old June 12 2011, 06:06 PM   #1
blssdwlf
Commodore
 
TOS Destroyer Concept

Hi All,

Getting more discretionary time back to do more lightwave stuff A while back I saw a great physical model of the USS Grissom modified to have a photon torpedo pod slung underneath instead of it's regular pod and decided to mock up my own TOS version...

blssdwlf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 07:49 PM   #2
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Neat, but the intersection of the saucer and pylons looks "wrong" somehow.
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 08:21 PM   #3
Albertese
Commodore
 
Albertese's Avatar
 
Location: Portland, OR
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

I agree with sojourner except that I would add that I'd like to see more differences to the nacelles too. They just look like scaled down Connie engine, I think you can do better than that. Apply yourself!

Otherwise I'm loving it!

--Alex
__________________
Check out my website: www.goldtoothstudio.squarespace.com
Albertese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 08:36 PM   #4
Psion
Commodore
 
Psion's Avatar
 
Location: Lat: 40.1630936 Lon: -75.1183777
View Psion's Twitter Profile
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

It's a great start, but like Sojourner says, the nacelle pylons look like they occupy the same space as part of the saucer. And why do they hook under the secondary hull like that? Wouldn't it make more sense for them to take a more direct route to their power supply?

BUT ...

It's your vision, blssdwlf, pick only the criticisms you agree with and ignore the rest. Make it a ship that you love, because you'll never please all of us.
__________________
Twinkies are back. I knew they couldn't stay away from me for long.
Psion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 09:11 PM   #5
Captain Robert April
Vice Admiral
 
Location: In selfless service to fandom, on the road to becoming a Star Trek trivia god...
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

First off, great job breaking away from the FJ Lollipop design that has plagued us for so long. This is what a destroyer should be, a small, fast attack ship.

We can certainly quibble about the details, but I like the direction this is going. Keep it up!
Captain Robert April is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 10:19 PM   #6
Wingsley
Commodore
 
Wingsley's Avatar
 
Location: Wingsley
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

You might also want to borrow a cue from Forbin's Minmus project, shown here in another thread in this forum. Forbin took a saucer and shorter, full-diameter nacelles and combined them in a proto-Miranda-type arrangement. Maybe your concept could benefit from shorter, full-diameter nacelles as well.
__________________
"The way that you wander is the way that you choose. / The day that you tarry is the day that you lose. / Sunshine or thunder, a man will always wonder / Where the fair wind blows ..."
-- Lyrics, Jeremiah Johnson's theme.
Wingsley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 12 2011, 10:37 PM   #7
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

I like it, I like it!
I wasn't going to invade the thread with my own ship, but I WAS going to suggest the short nacelles.
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 12:28 AM   #8
Patrickivan
Fleet Captain
 
Patrickivan's Avatar
 
Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

I like it as well- With the exception of the pylons intersecting the saucer. I would have them go directly into the "secondary" hull- but it's your baby. I like the scaled down nacelles. I don't see why they wouldn't have a standard design, big or small.

I dig it!
__________________
http://patrickivan.wordpress.com/page/2/

40 Years and ticking. Damn, that's too old fashioned.
40 years and still processing!
Patrickivan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 02:30 AM   #9
sojourner
Admiral
 
sojourner's Avatar
 
Location: I'm at WKRP
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Maybe go for nacelle proportions more like the Capella class has, as taken from Vance's toolkit:
__________________
Baby, you and me were never meant to be, just maybe think of me once in a while...
sojourner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 03:58 AM   #10
blssdwlf
Commodore
 
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Thanks guys for the feedback

@All - I tweaked the connection on the pylons and the primary hull a little and really dig the "short" nacelles on Forbin's ships. I also made the modular connection to the torpedo pod more clear. I hope y'all can tell it's a pretty small ship but I'm leaving enough volume to fill it with the interiors I'm building for the Enterprise.

@Psion - The warp nacelle pylons connect to the primary hull to feed power into the engineering section and the pylons below the primary hull serve as a structural support/additional connections to the modular base. I have a vertical pylon for crew access that connect down into the modular section. The USS Grissom/Jester which I base off of doesn't have an obvious way to get to the lower section, but I assumed that by then it's rather automated. In the TOS era it would still be manned and thus the additional path into the modular torpedo pod.

@Forbin - Thanks! It was seeing the Jester-class assembled by you ? that got me inspired in the first place!

@CRA - I was really tempted to do a single nacelle

blssdwlf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 03:23 PM   #11
Forbin
Admiral
 
Forbin's Avatar
 
Location: I said out, dammit!
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Dynamite!
Forbin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 07:31 PM   #12
publiusr
Commodore
 
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Another good pre-Oberth type vessel.
publiusr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 13 2011, 08:11 PM   #13
Kaiser
Rear Admiral
 
Kaiser's Avatar
 
Location: Boyertown, PA as of July 2011
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Kaiser Send a message via Yahoo to Kaiser
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

looks very awesome to me
__________________
https://www.facebook.com/groups/112860258811333/ For all your Sci-fi ship model and mini goodness 3DS Friend code: 0731-4800-6817
Kaiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14 2011, 12:23 AM   #14
TheLoneRedshirt
Commodore
 
TheLoneRedshirt's Avatar
 
Location: The void between my ears
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Very nice work!
__________________
"You are beginning to damage my calm." - Jayne Cobb
TheLoneRedshirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14 2011, 01:18 AM   #15
LibraryComputer
Ensign
 
Location: London, United Kingdom
Re: TOS Destroyer Concept

Very nice work indeed!
LibraryComputer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
concept, tos

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.