RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 138,250
Posts: 5,348,780
Members: 24,613
Currently online: 579
Newest member: Chairslinger

TrekToday headlines

MicroWarriors Releases Next Week
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Ships Of The Line Design Contest
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Next Weekend: Shore Leave 36!
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

True Trek History To Be Penned
By: T'Bonz on Jul 25

Insight Editions Announces Three Trek Books For 2015
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

To Be Takei Review by Spencer Blohm
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Mulgrew: Playing Red
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Hallmark 2015 Trek Ornaments
By: T'Bonz on Jul 24

Funko Mini Spock
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23

IDW Publishing Comic Preview
By: T'Bonz on Jul 23


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Entertainment & Interests > Science Fiction & Fantasy

Science Fiction & Fantasy Farscape, Babylon 5, Star Wars, Firefly, vampires, genre books and film.

View Poll Results: How Much Did You Enjoy X-MEN: FIRST CLASS?
A+ (Great Movie!) 73 35.61%
A (Entertained a lot!) 93 45.37%
B (Was okay, not bad) 30 14.63%
C (Below expectations) 6 2.93%
D (Very bad) 2 0.98%
F (Intolerable, want money back) 1 0.49%
Voters: 205. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old November 17 2011, 08:02 AM   #961
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

I'm just excited that the sequel is going forward. My one fan boy wish is that we'll see Sinister but I doubt it. I think Singer is quoted as saying that the sequel will see one or two additional mutants introduced.
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 05:07 AM   #962
DarthPipes
Rear Admiral
 
DarthPipes's Avatar
 
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Admiral_Young wrote: View Post
I'm just excited that the sequel is going forward. My one fan boy wish is that we'll see Sinister but I doubt it. I think Singer is quoted as saying that the sequel will see one or two additional mutants introduced.
The funny thing is they gave Shaw in First Class some of Sinsister's background and personality.
DarthPipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 05:30 AM   #963
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

I don't want to see Sinister in an X-Men movie without Cyclops.
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 06:35 AM   #964
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

^ Yeah...that probably won't happen now. Unless when they green light X4 a miracle happens and Scott is alive!!!
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 07:25 AM   #965
Skywalker
Admiral
 
Skywalker's Avatar
 
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Maybe Jean didn't vaporize Scott, but actually teleported him elsewhere and Sinister found him and started doing his wacky experiments on him and stuff!
Skywalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 07:28 AM   #966
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Or James Marsden will be playing En Saba Nur as a host for Apocalypse's body
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 07:52 AM   #967
Turtletrekker
Vice Admiral
 
Turtletrekker's Avatar
 
Location: Tacoma, Washington
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Skywalker wrote: View Post
Maybe Jean didn't vaporize Scott, but actually teleported him elsewhere and Sinister found him and started doing his wacky experiments on him and stuff!
This would actually retroactively improve X3 in my opinion.
__________________
I hate having thoughts on the top of my head. They usually jump off and commit suicide.
Turtletrekker is online now   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 08:16 AM   #968
captcalhoun
Admiral
 
Location: everywhere
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

the Phoenix in X3 was a clone of Jean, she's really been captured by Sinister, along with Scott. They're stuck in Sinister's lab somewhere, prisoners of the Nasty Boys and the Marauders until Cyclops and Phoenix the movie happens.
captcalhoun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 09:15 AM   #969
JacksonArcher
Vice Admiral
 
JacksonArcher's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to JacksonArcher
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Broccoli wrote: View Post
The impression I always got with TLS was that it had tons studio interference from the get go. While I don't have the irrational hate for Ratner the way the rest of the internet does, he does come off as a very "sure, whatever" kind of guy, which is probably why studios probably love to work with him (ie. he's easy to work with). Anyway, studio interference clearly had a hand in how the movie should go (in terms of story) as opposed to the previous X-Men movies. While those films (particularly the first one) had limitations in the production, the story was, from what I could tell, largely left alone.
All of the X-Men films have had considerable story interference from the studio. The writing process for X-Men is almost legendary because Fox kept on hiring different writers to continually re-write the script even during production. That's why Joss Whedon has like two lines of dialogue. The script, for the most part, was a Frankenstein mixmash of different material from various other scripts. Bryan Singer needs a lot of credit for managing to curtail some of this and get a very good movie out of the equation as a result.

For example, X2 was originally suppose to have the Danger Room, Angel and the Sentinels were going to make an appearance. Due to budget cuts and heavy studio interference, Singer was forced to cut those aspects from the story and heavily re-engineer the thematic outline for the film. Plus, he kept on having the budget slashed back, and had to contend with the given limitations and the consequences it had on the story. A big reason why the action is a lot more grandiose in X-Men: The Last Stand in comparison to Singer's movies is that Brett Ratner finally got the budget that Singer had been fighting for since the first movie. In all actuality, 20th Century Fox was a lot more agreeable with Ratner, at least when it came to budget and resources, than they ever were to Singer. That's a big reason why Bryan Singer jumped ship from 20th Century Fox to Warner Bros. - besides always wanting to make a Superman movie, Warner Bros. was giving Singer the freedom and flexibility that 20th Century Fox never gave Singer (at least until recently).

And it's not just the Internet that hates Brett Ratner. His films normally get horrible reviews and people have come to find an extreme disinterest in him because publicly he's a bit of an asshole. I think this whole recent incident with the Academy Awards is a very good example why people have such a vivid and pointed dislike in Brett Ratner so much. It would be one thing if he just made films that weren't always pedestrian Hollywood schlock, but he's an insufferable bastard for the most part to boot.

Which has nothing to do with anything. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to realize that Fox's attempts to lure Singer back was an attempt to kiss and make-up after the X3 breakdown that caused Singer to drop out of the film.
It has everything to do with the situation if you care to give it a closer look. Why do you think 20th Century Fox has never invited Ratner back to direct another X-Men movie? Probably because they realize X-Men: The Last Stand was a piece-of-crap. They realize they were idiots for letting Singer go and that his two X-Men movies were not only successful in a monetary sense but also critically acclaimed.

I'll have to find the quote, but it was an executive over at 20th Century Fox who basically said they were unhappy with the critical response of The Last Stand and X-Men Origins: Wolverine and swaying Singer back into the fold was an attempt to reclaim some of the critical acclaim. That's why 20th Century Fox heavily pursued and eventually hired Darren Aronofsky for the Wolverine sequel. I mean, why do you think 20th Century Fox would take such a huge gamble on Aronofsky when they know what kind of filmmaker he is and what kind of movies he makes? Because they wanted a critical success (as well as hopefully a box office success, of course) after the critical misfire of the last Wolverine movie.
__________________
"Please... We need you to hope again... " - Professor Charles Xavier, X-Men: Days of Future Past
JacksonArcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 10:59 AM   #970
Saga
Rear Admiral
 
Saga's Avatar
 
Location: VA
Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Saga Send a message via Yahoo to Saga
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

what? i thought everyone agreed to ignore X3.
__________________
formerly known as Praetor_Shinzon.
Saga is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 03:44 PM   #971
Captain Craig
Vice Admiral
 
Captain Craig's Avatar
 
Location: Nashville,TN
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

^^^
I guess we retconned that decision.
__________________
"Picard never hit me." Q-Less(DS9)
"Freedom is the Right of All Sentient Beings" Optimus Prime
Twitter:http://twitter.com/#!/CaptainCraig1
Captain Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 03:49 PM   #972
Admiral_Young
Fleet Admiral
 
Admiral_Young's Avatar
 
Location: Gallifrey
View Admiral_Young's Twitter Profile
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

^ No that was just Singer ignoring the Last Stand. Everyone else is free to discuss it
__________________
Admiral Young
Chief of Operations

Ignoring the The Last Stand since 2011.
Admiral_Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 04:45 PM   #973
Broccoli
Vice Admiral
 
Broccoli's Avatar
 
Location: Broccoli
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

JacksonArcher wrote: View Post
Broccoli wrote: View Post
The impression I always got with TLS was that it had tons studio interference from the get go. While I don't have the irrational hate for Ratner the way the rest of the internet does, he does come off as a very "sure, whatever" kind of guy, which is probably why studios probably love to work with him (ie. he's easy to work with). Anyway, studio interference clearly had a hand in how the movie should go (in terms of story) as opposed to the previous X-Men movies. While those films (particularly the first one) had limitations in the production, the story was, from what I could tell, largely left alone.
All of the X-Men films have had considerable story interference from the studio. The writing process for X-Men is almost legendary because Fox kept on hiring different writers to continually re-write the script even during production. That's why Joss Whedon has like two lines of dialogue. The script, for the most part, was a Frankenstein mixmash of different material from various other scripts. Bryan Singer needs a lot of credit for managing to curtail some of this and get a very good movie out of the equation as a result.

For example, X2 was originally suppose to have the Danger Room, Angel and the Sentinels were going to make an appearance. Due to budget cuts and heavy studio interference, Singer was forced to cut those aspects from the story and heavily re-engineer the thematic outline for the film. Plus, he kept on having the budget slashed back, and had to contend with the given limitations and the consequences it had on the story. A big reason why the action is a lot more grandiose in X-Men: The Last Stand in comparison to Singer's movies is that Brett Ratner finally got the budget that Singer had been fighting for since the first movie. In all actuality, 20th Century Fox was a lot more agreeable with Ratner, at least when it came to budget and resources, than they ever were to Singer. That's a big reason why Bryan Singer jumped ship from 20th Century Fox to Warner Bros. - besides always wanting to make a Superman movie, Warner Bros. was giving Singer the freedom and flexibility that 20th Century Fox never gave Singer (at least until recently).
I think that might be the reverse that Ratner was more agreeable with 20th Century Fox. If memory serves, the budget was set before Ratner came on board during pre-production after Vaughn bailed. It's very likely, unlike Singer, he was fine with what he was given and didn't push for more. I can see this given the surface-deep nature of his other films.

And it's not just the Internet that hates Brett Ratner. His films normally get horrible reviews and people have come to find an extreme disinterest in him because publicly he's a bit of an asshole.
I was referring to the hate Ratner gets as a director. While he isn't a great director, the amount of hate, I feel, is largely undeserved.

I don't think he's so much of an ass, but rather he just doesn't think before he talks in that what he thinks is funny really isn't that funny. In any event, it seems moviegoers really don't seem to care all that much considering his films, good or bad, nearly always blockbuster successful.

Most of the moviegoing public don't even know who directors are or know enough to care. After all, Roman Polanski continues to make financially successful films and, well, the less said about that, the better.

Which has nothing to do with anything. I don't think it's too much of a stretch to realize that Fox's attempts to lure Singer back was an attempt to kiss and make-up after the X3 breakdown that caused Singer to drop out of the film.
It has everything to do with the situation if you care to give it a closer look. Why do you think 20th Century Fox has never invited Ratner back to direct another X-Men movie? Probably because they realize X-Men: The Last Stand was a piece-of-crap. They realize they were idiots for letting Singer go and that his two X-Men movies were not only successful in a monetary sense but also critically acclaimed.[/quote]

Again, this has less to do with Ratner and more to do with getting back into bed with Singer. Ratner was a director for hire to complete a movie that some else already started before dropping out during pre-production. It could have been anyone in that spot and they would have been not been considered for future installments because they wanted to work with Singer.

That's why 20th Century Fox heavily pursued and eventually hired Darren Aronofsky for the Wolverine sequel. I mean, why do you think 20th Century Fox would take such a huge gamble on Aronofsky when they know what kind of filmmaker he is and what kind of movies he makes?
Because he's pals with Hugh Jackman and Jackman pushed for it, perhaps?
__________________
"That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence." -- Christopher Hitchens
Broccoli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 04:50 PM   #974
Captaindemotion
Vice Admiral
 
Captaindemotion's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

^ To play devil's advocate, they've apparently ended up with James Mangold, who is less of a hack than Ratner, but is hardly a maverick auteur like Aaronofsky.
__________________
Hodor!!!!!!!
Captaindemotion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 18 2011, 05:16 PM   #975
JacksonArcher
Vice Admiral
 
JacksonArcher's Avatar
 
Send a message via AIM to JacksonArcher
Re: X-MEN: FIRST CLASS - Grading+Discussion **SPOILERS!**

Broccoli wrote: View Post
I think that might be the reverse that Ratner was more agreeable with 20th Century Fox. If memory serves, the budget was set before Ratner came on board during pre-production after Vaughn bailed. It's very likely, unlike Singer, he was fine with what he was given and didn't push for more. I can see this given the surface-deep nature of his other films.
The budget actually ballooned when Ratner came on-board. I believe the budget was around $175-$200 million when Matthew Vaughn was slated to direct but after Ratner came on-board the budget apparently skyrocketed to over $225 million. At least that's what Empire reported.

According to Box Office Mojo, the purported production budget was $210 million. Comparatively speaking, the budget for X-Men was $75 million and the budget for X2 was $110 million. Ratner essentially had another $100 million more to work with than Singer had on X2.

Singer wanted the Danger Room, he wanted Sentinels, and he wanted bigger action sequences (as well as more breathing room for other characters like Angel). 20th Century Fox repeatedly denied him those things. Brett Ratner wanted the Danger Room, he wanted Sentinels (they weren't in the script before he came on-board; he reveals this in the commentary) and he wanted big action sequences and he got them. In my view, there's some faulty logic there. It seems 20th Century Fox should have been more flexible with Singer and had that happened he wouldn't have been enticed to jump ship. They were perfectly willing to accommodate Ratner and his needs but not Singer's.

I was referring to the hate Ratner gets as a director. While he isn't a great director, the amount of hate, I feel, is largely undeserved.
He makes bad films. At least, that's the general consensus. I can see why he gets that reputation, and unlike you, I think it's very well-deserved.

I don't think he's so much of an ass, but rather he just doesn't think before he talks in that what he thinks is funny really isn't that funny. In any event, it seems moviegoers really don't seem to care all that much considering his films, good or bad, nearly always blockbuster successful.
I guess referring to homosexuals as "fags" doesn't make him an asshole in your book. Okay, I'll accept that. I guess being racist and making fun of someone's ethnicity, and then repeatedly lying about someone's sex life in public is morally acceptable, or at least not "asshole" like behavior. We'll have to agree to disagree on that. Regarding the success of Brett Ratner's films, people will mostly accept and enjoy anything. Michael Bay's movies are somehow successful, the Twilight movies are hugely popular, and the list goes on. Ratner's films are definitely successful in a mainstream capacity, but then again I don't put much stock into the mainstream mentality because often the mainstream has very poor taste.

Most of the moviegoing public don't even know who directors are or know enough to care. After all, Roman Polanski continues to make financially successful films and, well, the less said about that, the better.
Are you sure about that? Look him up on Box Office Mojo. Polanski's last film, The Ghost Writer, made $15 million on a budget of $45 million. His film before that, Oliver Twist, earned a paltry $2 million on an estimated $60 million budget. Polanski's most successful film to date has been The Pianist, earning a little over $30 million, on a budget of $35 million, barely breaking even. I think Polanski is a great filmmaker and I'm a big fan of his movies, but to call them "financially successful" is overstating it.

Again, this has less to do with Ratner and more to do with getting back into bed with Singer. Ratner was a director for hire to complete a movie that some else already started before dropping out during pre-production. It could have been anyone in that spot and they would have been not been considered for future installments because they wanted to work with Singer.
Gavin Hood wasn't invited back for The Wolverine, either. Why? Because he made a crappy film. 20th Century Fox has acknowledged the poor quality of X-Men: The Last Stand and I think a big reason why Ratner hasn't been invited back is because they recognize that. We are belaboring the issue, though.

Because he's pals with Hugh Jackman and Jackman pushed for it, perhaps?
20th Century Fox equally wanted Aronofsky. They tried to get him for the first movie (and apparently for The Last Stand as well). Jackman doesn't have that much clout.
__________________
"Please... We need you to hope again... " - Professor Charles Xavier, X-Men: Days of Future Past
JacksonArcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
marvel, x-men

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.