RSS iconTwitter iconFacebook icon

The Trek BBS title image

The Trek BBS statistics

Threads: 135,683
Posts: 5,212,954
Members: 24,205
Currently online: 883
Newest member: JMSmith97


Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions.

If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name.


Go Back   The Trek BBS > Star Trek TV Series > Star Trek - Original Series

Star Trek - Original Series The one that started it all...

View Poll Results: Which is better?
Beyond the Farthest Star 18 100.00%
Once Upon A Planet 0 0%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old April 30 2011, 02:15 PM   #1
Botany Bay
Commodore
 
Botany Bay's Avatar
 
Location: shores of Australia
View Botany Bay's Twitter Profile Send a message via Windows Live Messenger to Botany Bay
Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Another week, and time for two more TAS episodes to go head to head. Next up :

Beyond the Farthest Star
vs. Once Upon A Planet
Botany Bay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30 2011, 02:41 PM   #2
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

No contest whatsoever. I love "Beyond The Farthest Star." It's a genuine final frontier type story going where no man has gone before.

I would have loved to see this live-action, and that's one of my favourite praises for one of my favourite TAS episodes. That said TOS would have been very challenged to do anything remotely like this in the '60s. For me this is one of those ideal stories for Star Trek and something I'd like to have seen done on the big screen. I'm really tired of the "bigger explosions, bigger action" and elevation of dumbness that's become so prominent in film, and yes that certainly includes ST09 as well as other Trek films and so many other sci-fi movies.

I love to imagine seeing that enormous alien starship, regrettably wrecked, found orbiting that negative star mass and having it explored by the Enterprise crew. This really utilized the advantages of animation.

This was actually the very first TAS episode I had seen, and back then I remember thinking "Whoa!" if this is what TAS is going to be like it will be amazing!

"Once Upon A Planet" is also a good story, but if feels too much like "The Doomsday Machine" crossed with Fantastic Voyage.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991

Last edited by Warped9; April 30 2011 at 03:53 PM.
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30 2011, 06:06 PM   #3
Lieut. Arex
Fleet Captain
 
Lieut. Arex's Avatar
 
Location: Nav console
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

"Once Upon a Planet" is the "Shore Leave" sequel. You're thinking of "One of Our Planets is Missing".
Lieut. Arex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 30 2011, 06:41 PM   #4
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Lieut. Arex wrote: View Post
"Once Upon a Planet" is the "Shore Leave" sequel. You're thinking of "One of Our Planets is Missing".
Oops! you're right. Then the choice is even more obvious. "Once Upon A Planet" feels much like a retread until towards the end.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2 2011, 10:34 PM   #5
Basill
Captain
 
Basill's Avatar
 
Location: TN
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Yeah, no question- "Beyond the Farthest Star" hands down.
__________________
"As they say, life is what happens to you while you're making other plans." -Art Linkletter

Visit my Trek Art blog at: http://starstation.wordpress.com/
Basill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3 2011, 03:19 AM   #6
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

"Once Upon a Planet" is a nice sequel, and I like the fleshing out of the shore leave planet. But it's one of too great a number of TAS episodes that are derivative followups to TOS episodes. "Beyond the Farthest Star" is much more imaginative and intriguing. Gotta love that alien ship. Great Filmation art.

The main thing that bugs me about BtFS is the ubiquity of the life-support belts. It's a convenient plot point, having everyone in force-field belts so they won't be killed when the entity shoots phasers at people, but it's hard to reconcile with the rest of Trek, even the rest of TAS. And why would it be necessary for the whole crew to immediately go to the belts just because life support got shut down on their decks? It's not like the air would go anywhere in a hurry. They'd have hours before the carbon dioxide buildup became toxic or the waste heat levels grew too great. Plenty of time to evacuate to other sections.

The main thing that's bugged me about OUaP in the past is something I've always taken as a coloring error, the way the shadows of the robot thingies holding Uhura captive in the overhead shots were painted the same color as the robots themselves. But I just had an idea when rewatching the episode recently -- maybe those aren't meant to be shadows, but reflections in a shiny floor. Although the silhouetted figures of Uhura and later Kirk and Spock have neither shadows nor reflections. So it looks kind of odd either way.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 1/21/14 including non-spoiler discussion for Rise of the Federation Book 2

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3 2011, 02:11 PM   #7
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

I've always thought the life-support belts were a very sci-fi idea that I couldn't reconcile with scientific credibility. Maybe I'm wrong, but as a concept it bugs me. Sure I understand the basic idea such as using a forcefield (such as a plasma window) to keep air out (or in) but that air has to be recycled. Where's the air supply? Also I guess life support belts are easier to draw than spacesuits and easier for the viewer to recognize the characters.

As I understand it, though, the life-support belt idea was initially conceived during the production of TOS, but they decided to go with environmental suits as seen in "The Tholian Web."
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3 2011, 02:47 PM   #8
Christopher
Writer
 
Christopher's Avatar
 
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

The air supply has long been a problem for me too, but I'm becoming more forgiving. The forcefield isn't exactly skintight; there are a few centimeters of space in between. And the belts do have largish "fanny packs" on the rear. Some kind of very compact air tanks and CO2 scrubbers could be in there. I can't buy the force-field belts for long-term use, but for maybe an hour or so in vacuum, or for filtering toxins out of an atmosphere, I can buy them.
__________________
Christopher L. Bennett Homepage -- Site update 1/21/14 including non-spoiler discussion for Rise of the Federation Book 2

Written Worlds -- My blog
Christopher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6 2011, 08:13 PM   #9
TigerOfDarkness
Fleet Captain
 
TigerOfDarkness's Avatar
 
Location: UK
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

I had assumed they used them to save having to draw lots of frames of Kirk etc. in space suits, however some details of the story would have to be different without them.
__________________
If we don't get off this planet we'll all die here.
TigerOfDarkness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6 2011, 09:51 PM   #10
Tallguy
Fleet Captain
 
Tallguy's Avatar
 
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Funny, I made the same mistake confusing "One of Our Planets is Missing" with "Once Upon a Planet". OoOPiM wins that one, largely because of the life support belts.

In the actual contest "Beyond the Farthest Star" without question. Although my choice is almost entirely because of the first half. It is really the awe and majesty that TOS always wanted to do but didn't have the budget for. Then we get to the second half and it feels like an episode that TOS could have done better. An odd mix.

The life support belts just seem like an accident waiting to happen. They kind of work in the beginning, but are (to me) a distracting plot device in the end. I've thought about what this episode would look like if it were filmed with environmental suits but it's pretty tough to make the Scotty scene work with a suit. Armor I guess?

But it's still one of the four or five best episodes that TAS did.
__________________
-- Bill "Tallguy" Thomas
"All I ask is a tall ship..."
Tallguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 7 2011, 01:34 PM   #11
Warped9
Admiral
 
Warped9's Avatar
 
Location: Brockville, Ontario, Canada
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

^^ If Scotty had been wearing some form of protective gear then then I think that scene could still have worked. I, too, think the life-support belts aren't really credible and even if so I imagine it as a temporary measure. If I had to go EVA I think I'd rather have a self-contained environment around me that didn't rely on some power source that just might cut out and then leave me totally exposed...and immediately dead.
__________________
STAR TREK: 1964-1991
Warped9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8 2011, 08:13 PM   #12
Timo
Admiral
 
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

And the belts do have largish "fanny packs" on the rear. Some kind of very compact air tanks and CO2 scrubbers could be in there.
TOS already featured breathing masks packing their rebreathing gear or extra O2 in much smaller space - see "Squire of Gothos". The air supply doesn't seem to present a problem, really. Instead, the remaining bulk of the belts makes one wonder what other functionalities are hidden there!

It's a convenient plot point, having everyone in force-field belts so they won't be killed when the entity shoots phasers at people, but it's hard to reconcile with the rest of Trek, even the rest of TAS.
As you say, "Beyond" would be inconsistent with "Slaver Weapon" if we assume that the belts protect our heroes from hurt-level phasers in the former and then note that they don't even stop stun phasers in the latter. But why should we think the belts do protect Kirk from the disciplinary phasers in this episode? After putting on his belt (a necessary move because the entity has just turned off life support), he repeatedly gets hurt, by phasers that are fired so that he would obey the beast; they aren't set for kill, then. Subsequently, he surrenders to the beast; this is what makes the alien stop firing at him, not any protection offered by the belt! So there's no inconsistency there or elsewhere: portable forcefields manufactured by Starfleet are never shown to be capable of stopping kill or even stun phasers.

And why would it be necessary for the whole crew to immediately go to the belts just because life support got shut down on their decks? It's not like the air would go anywhere in a hurry.
Life support was deliberately shut down in order to hurt those people. Certainly they'd be within their rights to take exceptional, maximal protective measures!

If I had to go EVA I think I'd rather have a self-contained environment around me that didn't rely on some power source that just might cut out and then leave me totally exposed...and immediately dead.
(Such as a spacesuit?)

For all we know, forcefields are less prone to catastrophic failure than mechanical suits. It's inconceivable that a forcefield would get punctured, for example. Just install a failure-proof power pack there; Starfleet must have plenty of those in stock, or else its starships would go kaboom at random when antimatter containment hiccuped...

I sort of wish they had introduced the belts in TOS already; they are tech on par with the magical transporters and phasers, while the tinfoil suits and later rigid suits of armor look rather anachronistic in comparison.

Timo Saloniemi
Timo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8 2011, 08:35 PM   #13
Maurice
Vice Admiral
 
Maurice's Avatar
 
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Then how about a forcefield AROUND a pressure suit?
__________________
* * *
“The absence of limitations is the enemy of art.”
― Orson Welles
Maurice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 8 2011, 09:26 PM   #14
Rom's Sehlat
Fleet Captain
 
Rom's Sehlat's Avatar
 
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

How about a pressure suit around a force field?
Rom's Sehlat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 9 2011, 04:23 PM   #15
Hambone
Fleet Captain
 
Hambone's Avatar
 
Location: Land of cheese, sausage and beer
Re: Beyond the Farthest Star vs. Once Upon A Planet

Perhaps the life support belt is sort of like a stasis field. It stops the body's requirement for oxygen, temperature regulation, air pressure, gravity fields, etc.

Nah...that's a dumb idea. Skip that.
__________________
Get a haircut, hippie.
Hambone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
tas

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.