|
Welcome! The Trek BBS is the number one place to chat about Star Trek with like-minded fans. Please login to see our full range of forums as well as the ability to send and receive private messages, track your favourite topics and of course join in the discussions. If you are a new visitor, join us for free. If you are an existing member please login below. Note: for members who joined under our old messageboard system, please login with your display name not your login name. |
|
|||||||
| Fan Productions Creating our own Trek canon! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
I've been checking youtube vids of the Avatar Scorpion Gunship and I've seen the ads for the Star Wars Falcon copter. Has anyone thought of using physical R/C flying or wheeling miniatures instead of cgi puppets? So much of what had to be fully cgi puppets does not have to that way anymore. (The Thing Prequel, Underworld series.) Heck, I've just seen a Large Flying RC Paper Airplane. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
![]() I don't entirely understand the original post though. Miniatures (which I presume the OP is talking about) work much better shot stationary against a green screen. I would think it would be a massive hassle to try and composite in an actual RC plane or helicopter.
__________________
You have eight Earth minutes left. No Further Communication Will Be Accepted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
as far as the idea of using the camera on the rc helicopter came from watching a commercial where the little remote heli was carrying a minicam -- I think it may well be a phone cam, but as you said, it's an idea worth considering. But it still would require a financial investment for the copter and cam, as well as learning curve (i.e. time) and the right story. |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
You may want to try a video search for helicams. When coupled with DSLR video the results are pretty spectacular. Great for scenic establishing shots.. but as I said, I'd never trust one enough to put $1000+ dollars worth (camera body and a suitable lens) of camera equipment in an RC helicopter.
__________________
You have eight Earth minutes left. No Further Communication Will Be Accepted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
Probably wouldn't cost more than $100 total, but I'm not sure how much lifting power a remote controlled blimp actually has relative to a real helicam rig
__________________
You have eight Earth minutes left. No Further Communication Will Be Accepted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
__________________
You have eight Earth minutes left. No Further Communication Will Be Accepted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Rear Admiral
Location: Maurice in San Francisco
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
Flying RC ships around in the air to do space battles seems silly and expensive, especially because you'd have to matte in the background anyway and most tiny cameras are going to give you video compressed up the wazoo that's notoriously hard to pull good mattes off. I notice the OP hasn't replied to anything in this thread, so I suspect this was a drive-by post.
__________________
* * *
"Star Trek…at times sparkled with true ingenuity, and pure science fiction approaches, and at other times was more carnival like, and very much more the creature of television than the creature of a legitimate literary form." |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Lieutenant Commander
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
Hello there. Fighting starships, tanks, etc. That's my idea. Stripping cameras on them is a great idea. the models don't have to be large. I wanted to get the old brain juices flowing. Thank you for the feedback.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Captain
Location: Cubicle Hell
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
__________________
"The beatings will continue until morale improves!" "Question: How many Imagineers does it take to change a light bulb? Imagineer's Answer: Does it have to have a light bulb?" |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Fleet Captain
Location: Southwest Georgia
|
Re: Is it time to use physical R/C flying models?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:02 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FireFox 2+ or Internet Explorer 7+ highly recommended.

















